Literature DB >> 30864867

Is natural variability in gait sufficient to initiate spontaneous energy optimization in human walking?

Jeremy D Wong1, Jessica C Selinger1,2, J Maxwell Donelan1.   

Abstract

In new walking contexts, the nervous system can adapt preferred gaits to minimize energetic cost. During treadmill walking, this optimization is not usually spontaneous but instead requires experience with the new energetic cost landscape. Experimenters can provide subjects with the needed experience by prescribing new gaits or instructing them to explore new gaits. Yet in familiar walking contexts, people naturally prefer energetically optimal gaits: the nervous system can optimize cost without an experimenter's guidance. Here we test the hypothesis that the natural gait variability of overground walking provides the nervous system with sufficient experience with new cost landscapes to initiate spontaneous minimization of energetic cost. We had subjects walk over paths of varying terrain while wearing knee exoskeletons that penalized walking as a function of step frequency. The exoskeletons created cost landscapes with minima that were, on average, 8% lower than the energetic cost at the initially preferred gaits and achieved at walking speeds and step frequencies that were 4% lower than the initially preferred values. We found that our overground walking trials amplified gait variability by 3.7-fold compared with treadmill walking, resulting in subjects gaining greater experience with new cost landscapes, including frequent experience with gaits at the new energetic minima. However, after 20 min and 2.0 km of walking in the new cost landscapes, we observed no consistent optimization of gait, suggesting that natural gait variability during overground walking is not always sufficient to initiate energetic optimization over the time periods and distances tested in this study. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While the nervous system can continuously optimize gait to minimize energetic cost, what initiates this optimization process during every day walking is unknown. Here we tested the hypothesis that the nervous system leverages the natural variability in gait experienced during overground walking to converge on new energetically optimal gaits created using exoskeletons. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that participants did not adapt toward optimal gaits: natural variability is not always sufficient to initiate spontaneous energy optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy optimization; gait; locomotion; motor learning; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30864867      PMCID: PMC6589705          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00417.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  The central nervous system does not minimize energy cost in arm movements.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Jeremy D Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Energetic cost and preferred speed of walking in obese vs. normal weight women.

Authors:  Raymond C Browning; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-05

3.  Intentional on-line control of propulsive forces in human gait.

Authors:  F Danion; M Bonnard; J Pailhous
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons.

Authors:  Rachel W Jackson; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-09

5.  Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.

Authors:  J M Brockway
Journal:  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-11

6.  Graphic representation of the relationship between oxygen-consumption and characteristics of normal gait of the human male.

Authors:  N H Molen; R H Rozendal; W Boon
Journal:  Proc K Ned Akad Wet C       Date:  1972

7.  The cost of walking downhill: is the preferred gait energetically optimal?

Authors:  L C Hunter; E C Hendrix; J C Dean
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Fast and slow processes underlie the selection of both step frequency and walking speed.

Authors:  Renato Pagliara; Mark Snaterse; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking.

Authors:  Jessica C Selinger; Shawn M O'Connor; Jeremy D Wong; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Mechanical work as an indirect measure of subjective costs influencing human movement.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Energy expenditure does not solely explain step length-width choices during walking.

Authors:  Stephen A Antos; Konrad P Kording; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Competing Models of Work in Quadrupedal Walking: Center of Mass Work is Insufficient to Explain Stereotypical Gait.

Authors:  Delyle T Polet; John E A Bertram
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Multi-objective control in human walking: insight gained through simultaneous degradation of energetic and motor regulation systems.

Authors:  Kirsty A McDonald; Joseph P Cusumano; Peter Peeling; Jonas Rubenson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Neuromechanics and Energetics of Walking With an Ankle Exoskeleton Using Neuromuscular-Model Based Control: A Parameter Study.

Authors:  Benjamin A Shafer; Sasha A Philius; Richard W Nuckols; James McCall; Aaron J Young; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  Shortcomings of human-in-the-loop optimization of an ankle-foot prosthesis emulator: a case series.

Authors:  Cara Gonzalez Welker; Alexandra S Voloshina; Vincent L Chiu; Steven H Collins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Humans use minimum cost movements in a whole-body task.

Authors:  Lijia Liu; Dana Ballard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Can humans perceive the metabolic benefit provided by augmentative exoskeletons?

Authors:  Roberto Leo Medrano; Gray Cortright Thomas; Elliott J Rouse
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Is there a trade-off between economy and task goal variability in transfemoral amputee gait?

Authors:  I-Chieh Lee; Bretta L Fylstra; Ming Liu; Tommaso Lenzi; He Huang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Evaluating the energetics of entrainment in a human-machine coupled oscillator system.

Authors:  Ryan T Schroeder; James L Croft; John E A Bertram
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.