Artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and therapeutic response using individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate antimalarial drug exposure is essential for curing malaria. Day 7 blood or plasma lumefantrine concentrations provide a simple measure of drug exposure that correlates well with artemether-lumefantrine efficacy. However, the 'therapeutic' day 7 lumefantrine concentration threshold needs to be defined better, particularly for important patient and parasite sub-populations.
METHODS: The WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) conducted a large pooled analysis of individual pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data from patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, to define therapeutic day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and identify patient factors that substantially alter these concentrations. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and conference proceedings identified all relevant studies. Risk of bias in individual studies was evaluated based on study design, methodology and missing data.
RESULTS: Of 31 studies identified through a systematic review, 26 studies were shared with WWARN and 21 studies with 2,787 patients were included. Recrudescence was associated with low day 7 lumefantrine concentrations (HR 1.59 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.85) per halving of day 7 concentrations) and high baseline parasitemia (HR 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.87) per 10-fold increase). Adjusted for mg/kg dose, day 7 concentrations were lowest in very young children (<3 years), among whom underweight-for-age children had 23% (95% CI -1 to 41%) lower concentrations than adequately nourished children of the same age and 53% (95% CI 37 to 65%) lower concentrations than adults. Day 7 lumefantrine concentrations were 44% (95% CI 38 to 49%) lower following unsupervised treatment. The highest risk of recrudescence was observed in areas of emerging artemisinin resistance and very low transmission intensity. For all other populations studied, day 7 concentrations ≥200 ng/ml were associated with >98% cure rates (if parasitemia <135,000/μL).
CONCLUSIONS: Current artemether-lumefantrine dosing recommendations achieve day 7 lumefantrine concentrations ≥200 ng/ml and high cure rates in most uncomplicated malaria patients. Three groups are at increased risk of treatment failure: very young children (particularly those underweight-for-age); patients with high parasitemias; and patients in very low transmission intensity areas with emerging parasite resistance. In these groups, adherence and treatment response should be monitored closely. Higher, more frequent, or prolonged dosage regimens should now be evaluated in very young children, particularly if malnourished, and in patients with hyperparasitemia.

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria [1]. In order to prolong their useful therapeutic life until effective novel antimalarials become available, optimal use and dosing of widely used ACTs is essential. This can only be achieved by accurately defining the therapeutic drug exposure thresholds, which enables identification of vulnerable populations in whom current dosing recommendations do not consistently achieve effective drug exposure. Therapeutic responses are mainly determined by density and susceptibility of the infecting malaria parasites and drug exposure, although acquired host immunity can compensate for failing treatments. For combination therapies, the early parasitological response is determined largely by the artemisinin component. To prevent recrudescence, the malaria parasites that remain after exposure to the artemisinin component for two 48-hr asexual cycles must be cleared by the slowly eliminated partner drug [2]. The precise pharmacokinetic (PK) determinants of treatment outcome in uncomplicated malaria remain uncertain, but the area under the blood or plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the concentration on day 7 of slowly eliminated antimalarials are considered important predictors [2, 3].

Artemether-lumefantrine accounted for 73 % of ACTs procured in 2013 [4]. Lumefantrine has variable bioavailability, largely due to fat-dependent absorption, with high plasma protein binding (mainly to high-density lipoproteins) and is extensively metabolized in the liver, primarily by the CYP3A4 enzymes [1]. Lumefantrine concentration on day 7 has been shown to be the most important single concentration measure, in terms of its correlation with the area under the concentration time curve and its association with treatment response [3, 5, 6]. The ‘therapeutic’ day 7 lumefantrine concentrations published to date range from 170 ng/ml to 500 ng/ml [6-12], and were defined mostly from individual studies with small numbers of treatment failures. Lower lumefantrine exposure has been described in young children [9], pregnant women [13-17], smokers [15], or when artemether-lumefantrine is taken unsupervised [9], without fat [18] or with concurrent efavirenz [19-21], rifampicin [22] or mefloquine [23]. However, the extent to which this compromises efficacy is poorly defined, and no dose optimization studies have been published in any of these important target populations.

While there are more studies published on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine than any other antimalarial, the individual studies published to date are not sufficient to develop optimal evidence-based dosage recommendations for all major target population groups. The objective of this analysis was to define therapeutic day 7 blood or plasma lumefantrine concentrations for artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria and to identify patient factors that cause substantial changes to these lumefantrine concentrations. For a drug with an overall high efficacy, this requires a very large sample set, which is most efficiently achieved by pooling available data. In addition to increasing power, using individual patient data allows for standardization of data curation and analysis.

Methods

Data acquisition

Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and conference proceedings using the key words ‘lumefantrine pharmacokinetics’ or ‘lumefantrine concentrations’ and ‘clinical study’. Participating authors agreed to the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) terms of submission [24], which ensure that all data uploaded were anonymized and obtained with informed consent, and in accordance with any laws and ethical approvals applicable in the country of origin. The WWARN automated data management, curation and analysis tools converted submitted data into a set of defined data variables in a standard format, following the WWARN clinical and pharmacology data management and statistical analysis plans [25, 26]. Study reports generated from the formatted datasets were sent back to investigators for validation or clarification.

For the analyses reported here, any study of non-pregnant patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria (including mixed infections) treated with a 2- or 3-day artemether-lumefantrine regimen, and with a blood or plasma lumefantrine concentration measurement available on day 7, was eligible for inclusion. Pregnant women were not included as all nine recrudescences in pregnant women were observed in one study in Thailand [16], the only study where lumefantrine concentrations were measured in capillary plasma – precluding disaggregation of the effects of pregnancy and sample matrix on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship. The effects of pregnancy on artemether-lumefantrine exposure have been published previously [8, 13–16].

Patients with a quantifiable pre-dose lumefantrine concentration were excluded from the analysis of determinants of day 7 lumefantrine concentration. Studies on re-treatment of treatment failures, or a protocol follow-up period of less than 28 days, or Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results unavailable/indeterminate, were excluded from the outcome analysis (Fig. 1). For the full list of studies [5, 7, 11, 12, 27–44] and assay methods [7, 45–51] used, see Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fig. 1

Study profile. PK, pharmacokinetic; LLOQ, Lower limit of quantification

Ethical approval

All data included in this analysis were obtained after ethical approvals from the countries of origin. Ethical approval to conduct individual participant data meta-analyses was granted by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC), and OxTREC ruled that appropriate informed consent had been met by each study.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were carried out according to the a priori statistical analysis plan [52].

Total dose was calculated from the recorded number of tablets administered per dose for each patient, if this information was available. If no individual patient dosing data was available, dose was estimated using the protocol dosing schedule. All studies in children used weight-based dosing. Treatment was classified as: supervised if all doses had been directly observed; partially supervised if at least the three morning doses had been observed; and not supervised if fewer doses were observed.

A lumefantrine concentration was considered as taken on day 7 if the sample time was recorded as between 144 and 196 hours, inclusive, or as day 6, 7 or 8 after starting artemether-lumefantrine treatment. If multiple concentrations were available within this time interval, the measurement closest to 168 hours was selected. Day 7 concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were replaced by values half of the limit of quantification [53] (for individual study limits of quantification, see Additional file 1: Table S1). Factors affecting log-transformed lumefantrine concentration on day 7 were investigated using normal regression with random effects for study site in patients treated with the standard artemether-lumefantrine regimen of six doses; those with lumefantrine concentrations > LLOQ before treatment were excluded from this analysis. As treatment supervision is a study-level variable and does not correspond to individual patient compliance with treatment it can mask the effects of other variables, so two multivariable models were fitted: one on all patients, adjusting for whether treatment administration was supervised or not; and another only on patients who received supervised treatment.

Age was analyzed as a categorical variable using <1, 1–4, 5–11 and 12+ years as categories, since pharmacokinetic parameters change with age in children but generally not in adults, and as treatment response improves as premunition is acquired with age in areas of moderate to high malaria transmission intensity. Further categorization in children younger than 5 years of age (1–2 and 3–4 years) was based on heterogeneity of the results; adjusted for dose and other factors, day 7 concentrations were different in these two groups (see Results, Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Table 2).

Table 2

Determinants of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations in non-pregnant patients treated with the six-dose artemether-lumefantrine regimen

	N (n)a	Change (%) (95 % CI)	P value
Univariable model
Dose (mg/kg)	2,551	0.3 (0.1 to 0.6)	0.010
Co-administration with fat	2,574 (2,185)	−1.0 (−28.2 to 26.2)	0.943
Unsupervised administrationb	2,574 (816)	−45.4 (−50.6 to −39.6)	<0.001
Age
< 1 year	82	−37.7 (−50.5 to −21.6)	<0.001
1–2 years	562	−46.5 (−53.5 to −38.5)	<0.001
3–4 years	597	−26.1(−35.7 to −15.1)	<0.001
5–11 years	534	−3.4 (−12.6 to 6.9)	0.507
12+ years	799	Reference
Sample matrix
Capillary bloodc	848	−38.2 (−54.0 to −22.4)	<0.001
Venous bloodc	544	18.5 (−34.7 to 71.8)	0.458
Venous plasma	1,182	Reference
Day of samplingd	2,574	−36.8 (−56.6 to −17.0)	0.004
Fevere	2,426 (1,054)	−17.4 (−24.0 to −10.8)	<0.001
Hemoglobinf	2,200	1.0 (−0.8 to 2.8)	0.272
Baseline parasitemia (log10)	2,554	−8.8 (−13.3 to −4.1)	<0.001
WAZg	1,240	3.2 (−1.7 to 8.0)	0.191
UWAh	1,240 (215)	−4.5 (−19.1 to 10.2)	0.559
Multivariable modeli
Dose (mg/kg)	2,422	0.5 (0.2 to 0.7)	0.001
Unsupervised administrationb	2,422 (795)	−43.8 (−49.1 to −38.0)	<0.001
Day of samplingd	2,422	−36.4 (−53.6 to −12.9)	0.005
Fevere	2,422 (1,052)	−13.5 (−20.1 to −6.4)	<0.001
Baseline parasitemia (log10)	2,422	−5.1 (−9.8 to −0.1)	0.045
Age
< 1 year	82	−38.1 (−51.1 to −21.7)	<0.001
1–2 years	555	−41.4 (−48.9 to −32.7)	<0.001
3–4 years	594	−20.9 (−30.9 to −9.4)	0.001
5–11 years	508	−6.6 (−16.1 to 4.0)	0.215
12+ years	683	Reference
Multivariable model – supervised administration onlyj
Dose (mg/kg)	1,562	0.4 (0.1 to 0.7)	0.007
Day of samplingd	1,562	−43.0 (−60.1 to −18.6)	0.001
Sample matrixk
Capillary bloodc	366	−15.2 (−31.0 to 4.3)	0.119
Venous bloodc	541	1.4 (−23.2 to 34.0)	0.921
Venous plasma	655	Reference
Hemoglobin
Capillary bloodc	366	−5.4 (−9.0 to −1.7)	0.005
Venous bloodc	541	2.4 (−1.5 to 6.4)	0.229
Venous plasma	655	−1.8 (−4.2 to 0.7)	0.163
Fevere	1,562 (590)	−12.2 (−19.3 to −4.4)	0.003
Baseline parasitemia (log10)	1,562	−6.1 (−10.7 to −1.4)	0.012
Age
< 3 years old UWAh	28	−52.8 (−65.0 to −36.5)	<0.001
Not UWA	262	−38.6 (−47.5 to −28.2)	<0.001
3–4 years old UWAh	48	−19.5 (−35.8 to 1.0)	0.061
Not UWA	229	−17.5 (−29.4 to −3.6)	0.015
5–11 years old	399	−2.0 (−11.5 to 8.5)	0.881
≥ 12 years old	596	Reference

aN, total number of patients with non-missing data; n, number of patients with this characteristic; bunsupervised administration includes five studies with no supervised doses and two studies with the three morning doses supervised; ccollected on filtered paper; dper day, evaluated between days 6 and 8; edefined as axillary temperature >37.5 °C on enrolment; fno statistically significant association was found when stratified by sample matrix; P for interaction = 0.435; gWorld Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) in children <5 years of age; hdefined using a WAZ < −2 in children <5 years of age; i151 out of 2,574 patients were excluded from this model due to missing information on dose (23) and fever (148); j131 out of 1,758 patients with supervised treatment were excluded from this model due to missing information on dose (3), fever (127), UWA status (1) or hemoglobin (65); kcomparison at mean value of hemoglobin of 11 g/dL

The hemoglobin cut-offs for moderate anemia were <10 g/dL in children under 5 years of age and <11 g/dL in older patients, and for severe anemia were <7 and <8 g/dL, respectively [54]. The following conversion from hematocrit was used: hemoglobin = (hematocrit-5.62)/2.60 [55].

The nutritional status of children under 5 years of age was calculated as a weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ), using the ‘igrowup’ package developed by WHO [56]. Those with WAZ under −2 (below the 3rd centile) were classified as underweight-for-age (termed ‘underweight’).

Transmission intensity was classified as very low, low, moderate or high, based on triangulation of information given in the original publication(s), observed PCR-confirmed reinfection rates, and the malaria endemicity estimates obtained for study sites and year from the Malaria Atlas Project [57] (Additional file 4: Table S2). Slow early parasitological response was defined as the loge parasite reduction rate at 48 hours (PRR48) <5 (provided a positive count was recorded on day 2), based on the distribution of PRR48 in all patients, or as parasite positivity by microscopy on day 3 [58]. Parasitological response in patients with a negative, or no count, on day 2 and a negative, or no count, on day 3 were classified as unknown.

WHO definitions of therapeutic efficacy outcome [59] were used. Risk factors for PCR-confirmed P. falciparum recrudescence and re-infection were examined in two separate analyses. In each analysis, patients with recurrence of P. falciparum parasitemia but PCR-confirmed outcome other than the one of interest (for example re-infection in the recrudescence analysis) and patients with a P. vivax infection were censored at the time of recurrence. Patients without a PCR genotyping result were excluded to avoid informative censoring. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the relationship between treatment outcome and lumefantrine concentration on day 7 and other pre-defined covariates. Random effects in the form of frailty parameters were used to adjust for study site effects [60]. The proportional hazard assumption was tested based on Schoenfeld residuals [61] and, in the case of non-proportionality, interactions with the categorized time variable were used to account for changing effects over time. Fractional polynomials [62] were used to explore possible non-linear forms of continuous variables; the best transformation was linear logarithmic for both lumefantrine concentration and parasitemia.

Pre-defined variables specified in the statistical analysis plan [52] were examined for inclusion in the final models in a stepwise forward fashion. Inclusion of covariates in the final model was based on whether they improved the overall model (likelihood ratio test), changed the coefficient estimates for other factors and examination of the residuals.

Risk of bias within studies was assessed based on: 1) study design (randomization, sequence generation, blinding); 2) methodology for outcome classification (assay methodology and limit of quantification for measurement of lumefantrine concentration on day 7, and PCR methodology for assessing treatment outcome); and 3) the number and proportion of patients with (a) missing outcomes (missing concentration on day 7, incomplete follow-up (<28 days), missing PCR results) and (b) missing baseline covariates (age, weight, parasitemia, temperature, hemoglobin/hematocrit, treatment supervision, dose administration with fat). For the final recrudescence model, two sets of sensitivity analyses were performed. Firstly a model was refitted with each study’s data excluded, one at a time, and a coefficient of variation around the parameter estimates calculated. This would identify any influential studies, that is, studies with unusual results (due to variations in methodology, patient population, and so on) that affect the overall pooled analysis findings. Secondly, to assess the impact of missing PCR data, an unknown outcome was imputed 20 times assuming the same proportion of recrudescent to new infections as observed in patients with known outcome; the model was refitted each time and imputation estimates and their 95 % CI were calculated [63].

Results

Data summary

WWARN received and curated data from 26 artemether-lumefantrine pharmacokinetic studies of 6,229 malaria patients in 12 countries in Africa and Asia (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). In the initial search carried out in December 2012, a further four studies were identified [10, 64–66] and investigators invited to participate, but their data was not deposited in the WWARN repository so could not be included (one study was contributed after the analysis was completed). The last bibliographic search carried out in December 2014 identified another recent relevant study [13], when it was too late to include in the analysis.

Five studies were excluded as they were studies of pregnant women, did not collect day 7 pharmacokinetic samples or evaluated a five-day artemether-lumefantrine regimen (Fig. 1). Among the 21 artemether-lumefantrine therapeutic efficacy studies included in this analysis, lumefantrine concentrations on day 7 were available for 2,787 patients (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1), comprising: 82 infants (median 8 months); 1,188 children aged 1–4 years (median 3 years); 564 children aged 5–11 years (median 8 years); and 953 non-pregnant patients aged ≥12 years termed ‘adults’ (range = 12–87 years, IQR = 16 to 30, with 99 % <60 years of age). Among the children aged <5 years, 220/1,269 (17 %) were underweight-for-age (termed ‘underweight’), with a median WAZ of −2.6 (range = −5.3 to −2.0; IQR = −3.1 to −2.27). There were no important clinical differences in baseline characteristics between patients with pharmacokinetic data (from 3 % to 100 % across studies) and the patients in these studies in whom day 7 lumefantrine concentrations were not measured (Table 1). Almost all patients had been treated with Novartis Coartem® tablets (2,756/2,787; 99 %), with very few (31/2,787; 1 %) given Novartis Coartem® Dispersible tablets; none had been treated with a generic artemether-lumefantrine formulation.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patientsa with and without day 7 lumefantrine concentrations

Parameter	Patients with day 7 lumefantrine concentration		Patients without day 7 lumefantrine concentration		P valueb
	N	Median (range) or N (%)	N	Median (range) or N (%)
Age (years)	2,786	6.2 (0.3 to 86.7)	2,805	5.5 (0.2 to 80.0)	0.028
Age category					<0.001
< 1 year		82 (3.0)		107 (3.8)
1–2 years		573 (20.6)		590 (21.0)
3–4 years		615 (22.1)		604 (21.5)
5–11 years		564 (20.2)		852 (30.4)
≥ 12 years		953 (34.2)		652 (23.2)
Weight (kg)	2,786	18.5 (5.0 to 150.0)	2,797	17.0 (5.0 to 97.0)	0.104
Underweightc	1,269	220 (17.3)	1,299	218 (16.8)	0.211
Total dose (mg/kg)	2,764	65.5 (19.2 to 144.0)	2,786	65.5 (20.9 to 144)	0.092
Treatment supervision	2,787		2,788		<0.001
Fully		1,971 (70.7)		1,644 (59.0)
Partially		115 (4.1)		602 (21.6)
Unsupervised		701 (25.2)		542 (19.4)
Co-administration with fat	2,787		2,809		0.147
Yes/advised		2,204 (79.1)		1,752 (62.4)
Not stated		583 (20.9)		1,057 (37.6)
Parasitemia (/μl)	2,767	17,140 (16 to 524,414)	2,799	18,120 (10 to 862,400)	0.021
Temperature (°C)	2,662	37.7 (34.3 to 41.9)	1,967	37.5 (35.0 to 41.5)	<0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL)	2,068	10.6 (4.8 to 25)	1,484	11.3 (4.2 to 17.9)	0.428
Sex (female)	2,787	1,281 (46.0)	2,805	1,278 (45.6)	0.857
Gametocytes present	2,418	112 (4.9)	1,654	92 (5.6)	0.797
Moderate anemia	2,507	1,132 (45.1)	1,484	516 (34.8)	0.016
Severe anemia	2,507	155 (6.2)	1,484	57 (3.8)	0.056

aPatients enrolled in the 21 studies included in the pooled analysis; badjusted for study site in a random effects model; cdefined using a weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) < −2 in children <5 years of age

Dosage regimen

The majority of patients (2,641/2,787; 95 %) were treated with the current WHO recommended six-dose artemether-lumefantrine regimen administered over 3 days (60 hours). The median (range) of the total body weight-adjusted dose received was: 90 (45–144) mg/kg for infants; 65 (38–111) mg/kg for children aged 1–4 years; 72 (48–111) mg/kg for children aged 5–11 years; and 58 (19–108) mg/kg for patients aged 12 years or older (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Underweight children aged 1 to 2 years received higher mg/kg doses than better nourished children of the same age (80 (38–111) mg/kg compared to 65 (38–97) mg/kg; P <0.001). However, the opposite was seen in 4-year-old children (60 (45–90) mg/kg compared to 82 (48–111) mg/kg; P <0.001), as the better nourished 4-year-olds usually received the two-tablet dose recommended for the weight band 15–24 kg, while underweight 4-year-olds only received the one-tablet dose recommended for the 5–14 kg weight band, as all underweight children weighed <14 kg (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Two alternative regimens (termed ‘non-standard treatment’) were also investigated in adults; in these studies the total recommended dose was given as single daily doses for 3 days (n = 19) or 2/3 of the recommended dose was given as four doses over 2 days (n = 127).

Day 7 lumefantrine concentrations

Day 7 lumefantrine concentrations were measured either in venous plasma (n = 1,395 (50 %); 16 studies), capillary whole blood dried on filter paper (n = 848 (29 %); 5 studies) or venous whole blood dried on filter paper (n = 544 (19 %); 2 studies) (Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2, Additional file 5: Figure S3). The coefficient of variation of the day 7 lumefantrine concentration (on log scale) by study, after adjusting for mg/kg dose administered, was highest in capillary blood on filter paper ranging between 43–240 %, compared to 24–27 % in venous blood on filter paper and 23–70 % in venous plasma. Hemoglobin was only associated independently with lumefantrine concentrations measured in capillary whole blood samples. For blood collected on filter paper, most assays (97 %) had LLOQ ≥25 ng/ml, while measurements in venous plasma were more sensitive (LLOQ ≤5 ng/ml for 56 % of samples). For lumefantrine concentrations measured in capillary blood on filter paper, 8 % were below the limit of quantification (BLQ), while only 1 % of those in venous plasma or in venous blood on filter paper were BLQ. The majority of children under 5 years of age (59 %) had lumefantrine concentrations measured in capillary blood, while these were measured in venous plasma for the majority of older patients (60 %). Additional file 5: Figure S3 shows the distribution of measured concentrations by study.

The exact time of the lumefantrine concentration sample collection was available in 384 (14 %) patients, with a median of 166 (IQR = 164 to 168) hours. The protocol time in hours was known in 33 (1 %) patients, while in the remaining patients only the day of measurement was recorded. Pre-dose lumefantrine concentrations were measured in 676/2,787 (24.3 %) patients in five studies; these were assumed to be BLQ in studies without pre-dose concentrations measured. After excluding patients with quantifiable lumefantrine concentrations before the first dose (n = 67/676; 9.9 %), the lowest day 7 dose-adjusted lumefantrine concentrations were measured in capillary blood (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Determinants of day 7 lumefantrine concentration

In patients treated with the standard six-dose regimen and without quantifiable lumefantrine concentrations before the first dose (Fig. 1), the independent factors associated with lower day 7 lumefantrine concentrations (Table 2) were: unsupervised (including partially supervised) treatment (43.8 % (95 % CI 38.0 to 49.1 %) lower than supervised treatment); age (infants had 38.1 % (95 % CI 21.7 to 51.1 %), children aged 1–2 years had 41.4 % (95 % CI 32.7 to 48.9 %) and children aged 3–4 years had 20.9 % (95 % CI 9.4 to 30.9 %) lower concentrations than adults); and fever on admission (13.5 % (95 % CI 6.4 to 20.1 %) lower than patients with only a history of fever). As fat was co-administered with artemether-lumefantrine doses in the majority of patients (n = 2,185, 85 %), no fat effect was detected (P = 0.943). Within the time window studied (days 6 to 8), the lumefantrine concentration declined by 36.6 % (95 % CI 13.1 to 53.7 %) per day, which corresponds to a terminal half-life of 37 (95 % CI 22 to 118) hours. The effect of body weight-adjusted (mg/kg) dose was relatively small, increasing the day 7 lumefantrine concentration by 9.8 % (95 % CI 4.0 to 15.9 %) for each 20 mg/kg increase in total lumefantrine dose. After adjusting for these factors in a multivariable model (Table 2), assay matrix sampled (venous plasma or capillary or venous blood on filter paper) did not significantly alter the day 7 lumefantrine concentrations.

Among patients given supervised treatment with a standard six-dose regimen (Table 2), after adjusting for the other covariates, including body weight-adjusted (mg/kg) dose, adequately nourished children aged 3–4 years had 17.5 % (95 % CI 3.6 to 29.4 %) lower concentrations than adults, while those aged <3 years had 38.6 % (95 % CI 28.2 to 47.5 %) lower concentrations. The effect of nutritional status was apparent in children <3 years of age; those who were underweight had a 23.2 % (95 % CI −0.7 to 41.4 %) lower concentration than adequately nourished children in the same age group (P = 0.057) and a 52.8 % (95 % CI 36.5 to 65.0 %) lower concentration than all adults (P <0.001). However, this association of lumefantrine concentration with nutritional status was not observed in children aged 3 or 4 years old (P = 0.881). Very young children, particularly those who were underweight, not only had lower lumefantrine concentrations compared to older patients for a given total mg/kg dose (Fig. 2, Table 2), but these lower concentrations occurred despite their actual mg/kg dose administered being higher (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Among the 318 children under 3 years of age with supervised treatment administration, 91 (29 %) had day 7 concentrations below 200 ng/ml compared to 129/1,440 (9 %) older children and adults. This risk was highest among the underweight children under 3 years of age, of whom 13/31 (42 %) had day 7 concentrations below 200 ng/ml. The lower concentrations measured in this age group were consistent across regions and assay matrices.

Fig. 2

Measured day 7 lumefantrine concentrations in patients given supervised treatment with the recommended six-dose artemether-lumefantrine regimen, by age and nutrition status. Concentrations are dose-adjusted and scaled for a total dose of 72 mg/kg (after excluding patients with quantifiable lumefantrine concentrations pre-treatment). Outside values are not shown

Day 7 lumefantrine concentration and clinical outcome

After excluding one study on artemether-lumefantrine retreatment of treatment failures and patients without a defined treatment outcome, the association between day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and treatment response was evaluated in 2,528 patients in 20 studies (Fig. 1). Protocol follow-up time varied between 28 and 63 days; 101 patients (3.9 %) were lost to follow-up before day 28. During the follow-up period, 564 recurrent parasitemias were recorded: 321 within 28 days of follow-up; 221 between days 29 and 42; and 62 between days 43 and 63. Among these, there were: 73 P. falciparum recrudescences; 376 new P. falciparum infections (196 after day 28); 112 P. vivax infections; and three infections with another Plasmodium species. Forest plots showing individual study estimates of the risks of recrudescence and reinfection by day 28 and day 42 are presented in Additional file 6: Figure S4 and Additional file 7: Figure S5, respectively.

P. falciparum recrudescence

The main predictors of recrudescence were high baseline parasitemia and low lumefantrine concentration on day 7 (Fig. 3, Table 3). The estimates of the hazard ratios (HRs) for lumefantrine concentration and parasitemia were very robust; the HR coefficient of variation, after exclusion of one study at a time, was 1.9 % and 5.9 %, respectively.

Fig. 3

Predicted day 7 lumefantrine concentrations needed to achieve a 95 % cure rate by day 42. Results are derived from multivariable Cox regression model (Table 3) for key patient populations. A zero study site effect was assumed. TIA, transmission intensity area

Table 3

Cox regression analysis of risk of recrudescence by day 42

Parameter	Patientsa	Eventsa	HR (95 % CI)	P value
Univariable model
Day 7 lumefantrine concentration (log2)
Allb	2,528	70	0.64 (0.55 to 0.74)	<0.001
Venous plasma	1,336	46	0.56 (0.46 to 0.69)	<0.001
Capillary bloodb	663	21	0.68 (0.54 to 0.84)	0.001
Venous bloodb	529	3	0.84 (0.16 to 4.34)	0.559
Age (years)	2,528	70	1.01 (0.99 to 1.04)	0.22
Age categoryb
< 1 year	73	2	0.32 (0.06 to 1.59)	0.162
1–4 years	1,004	29	0.55 (0.23 to 1.31)	0.177
5–11 years	540	4	0.39 (0.13 to 1.21)	0.103
12+ years	911	32	Reference
Sex (female)	2,528 (1,157)	70 (32)	1.33 (0.82 to 2.16)	0.254
Baseline parasitemia (log10)	2,527	70	1.85 (1.33 to 2.76)	0.003
Baseline temperature (°C)	2,384	56	1.17 (0.93 to 1.46)	0.181
Baseline feverc	2,384 (1,049)	56 (36)	1.49 (0.84 to 2.64)	0.177
Baseline gametocytemia	2,197 (109)	53 (4)	1.69 (0.58 to 4.94)	0.335
Hemoglobinb	2,189	57	1.01 (0.90 to 1.14)	0.857
Moderate anemia	2,279 (1,022)	58 (25)	0.78 (0.44 to 1.39)	0.402
Severe anemia	2,279 (138)	58 (6)	1.23 (0.51 to 2.99)	0.642
WAZ	1,076	34	0.92 (0.70 to 1.21)	0.538
Underweight d	1,076	34	1.36 (0.61 to 3.03)	0.457
Palpable spleen	1,732 (272)	35 (8)	1.25 (0.56 to 2.78)	0.581
Palpable liver	1,732 (102)	35 (5)	1.19 (0.43 to 3.29)	0.732
<Six-dose artemether-lumefantrine regimen	2,528 (142)	70 (15)	5.32 (1.97 to 14.39)	<0.001
D2 Parasite positive count	1,901 (179)	47 (17)	3.12 (1.55 to 6.25)	0.001
D3 Parasite positive count	2,153 (23)	51 (5)	5.29 (1.78 to 15.76)	0.003
Log of PRR48e	1,897	47	0.86 (0.76 to 0.97)	0.011
Early parasitological responsef
Fast	1,193	36	Reference
Slow	65	8	2.98 (1.25 to 7.07)	0.014
Unknown	1,270	26	1.05 (0.54 to 2.06)	0.879
Transmission intensity areas (TIA)b
Very low	66	9	6.52 (1.28 to 33.23)	0.024
Low	500	23	1.74 (0.59 to 5.09)	0.314
Moderate	738	12	0.83 (0.23 to 2.94)	0.769
High	1,224	26	Reference
Multivariable modelg
Day 7 lumefantrine concentration (log2)	2,527	70	0.63 (0.54 to 0.73)	<0.001
Baseline parasitemia (log10)	2,527	70	1.87 (1.22 to 2.87)	0.004
Location/transmission intensity area (TIA)
Cambodia	77	10	13.44 (2.51 to 72.02)	0.002
Very low TIA	66	9	5.63 (1.10 to 28.92)	0.039
Low TIA	423	13	1.32 (0.34 to 5.07)	0.69
High/moderate TIA
< 1 year	71	2	0.80 (0.14 to 4.73)	0.807
1–4 years	973	31	1.37 (0.46 to 4.11)	0.578
5+ years	917	5	Reference
<Six-dose artemether-lumefantrine regimen	2,527	70	4.38 (1.54 to 12.49)	0.006
Early parasitological response
Fast	1,193	36	Reference
Slow	65	8	2.72 (1.04 to 7.16)	0.042
Unknown	1,269	26	1.02 (0.51 to 2.04)	0.964

aNumbers in brackets refer to patients with the symptom/characteristic present; b P value for testing the proportional hazards assumption <0.05; cfever defined as axillary temperature >37.5 °C; donly evaluated in children <5 years of age and defined as weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) < −2; ePRR48, parasite reduction rate at 48 hours; fslow early parasitological response was defined as parasite positivity on day 3 or loge of PRR48 < 5 (provided positive count was recorded on day 2); g1 out of 2,528 patients with outcome were excluded from this model due to missing information on baseline parasitemia. TIA, transmission intensity area

In the multivariable model (Table 3), the highest risk of recrudescence (HR 13.44; 95 % CI 2.51 to 72.02; P = 0.002) was observed in one study in a low transmission setting in Cambodia (2003–2004; n = 79), where delayed early parasitological response was observed and artemisinin resistance subsequently confirmed. An increased risk of recrudescence (HR 5.63; 95 % CI 1.10 to 28.92; P = 0.039) was also observed in the very low transmission areas studied (n = 66, two studies, both in Thailand). The increased risk of recrudescence in these areas was still observed after adjusting for slow early parasitological responses in 65 of 2,527 patients, who had an almost 3-fold higher risk of recrudescence (HR 2.72; 95 % CI 1.04 to 7.16; P = 0.014) compared to those with faster parasite clearance.

Within the low transmission areas, the small number of recrudescences precluded any meaningful comparisons between age categories. In the moderate/high transmission areas, the increased risk of recrudescence in children aged 1–4 years old was not statistically significant (HR 1.37; 95 % CI 0.46 to 4.11). However, after adjusting for their day 7 lumefantrine concentrations, the risk of recrudescence appeared to increase with a decrease in the weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ), but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.26; 95 % CI 0.94 to 1.69; P = 0.12 per unit decrease, which corresponds to a doubling of the recrudescence risk (HR 2.01; 95 % CI 0.83 to 4.83) for a young child with a WAZ of −3, when compared to an adequately nourished child with a WAZ of 0).

This multivariable model (Table 3) predicts that a day 7 lumefantrine concentration of at least 200 ng/ml was sufficient to achieve 95 % cure rates in all patients, including infants, in low, moderate and high transmission intensity areas, provided the baseline parasitemia was below 135,000 parasites/μl. However, in Cambodia and the areas of very low transmission intensity studied, concentrations ≥1,000 ng/ml (depending on baseline parasitemia) were required (Fig. 3).

P. falciparum re-infection

A 2-fold increase in (or doubling of) day 7 lumefantrine concentrations was associated with a 30 % reduction in the risk of reinfection (Table 4); however, this was not constant over the follow-up period. The effect of day 7 lumefantrine concentration remained apparent for longer when measured in plasma than if measured in capillary or venous blood collected on filter paper (28 versus 21 days), which is consistent with the lower sensitivity of the filter paper assays (Additional file 1: Table S1). Not surprisingly given lumefantrine’s elimination half-life, no association between day 7 concentration and the risk of reinfection was observed after day 28 (HR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.90 to 1.16; P = 0.735). These results were confirmed by the sensitivity analyses, when each study was excluded in turn.

Table 4

Cox regression analysis of risk of new Plasmodium falciparum infection by day 28

Parameter	Patientsa	Eventsa	HR (95 % CI)	P value
Univariable model
Day 7 lumefantrine concentration (log2)
Allb	2,528	180	0.79 (0.72 to 0.87)	<0.001
Venous plasma	1,336	40	0.65 (0.56 to 0.76)	<0.001
Capillary bloodb	663	130	0.87 (0.78 to 0.98)	0.002
Venous blood	529	10	0.82 (0.33 to 2.07)	0.619
Age (years)	2,528	180	0.95 (0.92 to 0.99)	0.009
Age category
< 1 year	73	9	3.51 (1.16 to 10.59)	0.026
1–4 years	1,004	148	5.01 (2.06 to 12.21)	<0.001
5–11 years	540	14	2.95 (1.17 to 7.39)	0.021
12+ years	911	9	Reference
Sex (female)	2,528 (1,157)	180 (93)	1.13 (0.84 to 1.51)	0.428
WAZ	1,076	157	0.86 (0.76 to 0.97)	0.015
Underweightc	1,076 (192)	157 (37)	1.22 (0.84 to 1.79)	0.299
Transmission intensity areas (TIAs)
Very low/lowd	557	9	0.17 (0.05 to 0.51)	0.002
Moderate	721	17	0.16 (0.05 to 0.56)	0.004
High	1,070	154	Reference
Multivariable model
Day 7 lumefantrine concentration (log2)e	2,528	180	0.70 (0.63 to 0.78)	<0.001
Location/transmission intensity area (TIA)
Very low/low/moderate TIA	1,304	26	0.22 (0.06 to 0.82)	0.024
High TIA
< 1 year	57	9	0.91 (0.27 to 3.05)	0.882
1–4 years	703	138	1.35 (0.49 to 3.74)	0.565
5+ years	464	7	Reference

aNumber in brackets refers to patients with presence of the symptom/characteristic; b P value for testing proportional hazards assumption <0.05; conly evaluated in children <5 years of age and defined as weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) < −2; dvery low and low TIAs were combined as no new infections were observed in very low TIA; efor concentrations measured on filter paper, the association with risk of new infection diminished after 21 days, hazard ratio = 1.062 (0.887–1.270), while for venous plasma this remained the same over the whole period. TIA, transmission intensity area

As expected, patients in high transmission areas had a higher risk of reinfection overall than patients in other areas (HR 5.76; 95 % CI 2.29 to 14.49; P <0.001), after adjusting for the day 7 lumefantrine concentration. Among children 1–4 years of age in high transmission areas, the risk of reinfection increased with a decrease in WAZ (HR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.35 per unit change; P = 0.017). This corresponds to a HR of 1.63 (95 % CI 1.09 to 2.44) for a child with WAZ of −3 compared to an adequately nourished child (WAZ = 0). In high transmission intensity areas, the estimated reinfection rates in young children with a day 7 plasma lumefantrine concentration of 200 ng/ml varied from 14 % for children with WAZ of 0 to 17, 19, 22 and 26 % for children with WAZ of −1, −2, −3 and −4, respectively (Fig. 4). In this group of young children, age was not associated with the risk of reinfection (P = 0.341).

Fig. 4

Predicted reinfection rates by day 28 for a day 7 venous plasma lumefantrine concentration of 200 ng/ml. Results are shown for children 1–4 years of age in high transmission intensity areas, depending on their nutrition status (weight-for-age Z-score, WAZ). A zero study site effect was assumed.

Assessment of risk of bias

The risk of bias in individual studies was classified as low (Additional file 8: Table S3). Non-randomized or unblinded studies were included in this analysis as this is not considered a significant risk of bias in PK-PD studies which explore the relationship between drug concentrations and treatment response within a single treatment arm. For these study designs, baseline characteristics across the studies and the process of participant selection, as well as the details of the intervention (drug, dose and duration) are more relevant in considering the potential impact of bias on the results. In terms of assessment of the drug concentrations, the blinding of all three independent outcome laboratory assessments (namely the pharmacokinetic assays that measure the day 7 lumefantrine concentrations, as well as the microscopy and PCR laboratories that classify treatment outcome) further reduce the risk of bias.

Sensitivity analyses showed that exclusion of any of the studies (including those that are non-randomized or unblinded, or used different lumefantrine assay methods) did not change the main conclusions of the analysis (coefficient of variation was 1.9 % and 5.9 % for lumefantrine concentration and parasitemia, respectively). Similarly, the results were not affected by the exclusion of patients with missing or indeterminate PCR data (multiple imputation estimates of HR were 0.65 (95 % CI 0.56 to 0.76) and 1.76 (95 % CI 1.17 to 2.67) for log2 concentration and log10 parasitemia, respectively).

Five studies (Additional file 9: Table S4) that were not included in the pooled analysis represent 447 patients with day 7 concentrations measured and 14 of the recrudescent infections observed during follow-up. These represent only 14 % and 16 % of the sample numbers in all 31 studies identified, respectively. It is unlikely that inclusion of these would have affected the results significantly, as the aggregate data reported on their baseline characteristics, day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and risks of treatment failure were similar to those included in our meta-analysis.

Discussion

In this study, the largest pooled analysis of individual patient PK-PD data for any antimalarial to date, artemether-lumefantrine was generally highly effective with only 73 (3 %) P. falciparum recrudescences among the 2,528 patients included in the treatment outcome analysis. The most important determinants of therapeutic response were baseline parasite density and day 7 blood or plasma lumefantrine concentrations. Current artemether-lumefantrine dosing recommendations achieve day 7 lumefantrine concentrations ≥200 ng/ml and >98 % cure rates in most uncomplicated malaria patients. However, three groups were at increased risk of treatment failure: very young children, particularly those that are underweight-for-age; patients with high parasitemias; and patients in areas with very low transmission intensity and slow early parasitological responses (reflecting artemisinin resistance).

Young children had 17.5–52.8 % lower day 7 lumefantrine concentrations following supervised treatment despite their actual mg/kg dose being higher, as they have higher body weight normalized apparent clearance after oral administration [35]. Optimal dosing of artemether-lumefantrine in young children requires urgent investigation. Children under 5 years of age are at particular risk as they account for 78 % of all malaria-related deaths [4]. Although this large pharmacokinetic data set did not have sufficient recrudescences to confirm the trend towards a higher risk of recrudescence among underweight young children, this was confirmed in the larger WWARN artemether-lumefantrine dose impact analysis. Underweight African children between 1 and 3 years old had an increased risk of recrudescence when compared with those of the same age who were not underweight (adjusted HR 1.66; 95 % CI 1.05 to 2.63; P = 0.028) and a 4-fold higher risk than patients aged ≥12 years (adjusted HR 4.05; 95 % CI 1.78 to 9.18; P = 0.001) [67].

Malaria and malnutrition are common co-morbidities, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where 90 % of global malaria deaths occur [4] and 30–33 % of children under 5 years of age are underweight [68]. However, there have been few studies on the effect of malnutrition on malaria, and these have yielded conflicting results [69-71]. The mechanisms underlying the effects of malnutrition on antimalarial treatment response are complex and poorly understood. Malnutrition has also been shown to compromise the efficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine [72-75]. Several physiological changes can occur with malnutrition that may decrease drug concentrations, including reduced drug absorption and/or an increased volume of distribution. Malnutrition may reduce protein binding and increase clearance, but concomitant hepatic dysfunction may reduce the metabolism of some drugs. The net effect is uncertain [1, 76]. In addition, the innate and adaptive immune responses may be impaired by malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies [70, 77, 78], which could explain the increased risk of malaria recurrence observed in our underweight young children even after adjusting for their total day 7 lumefantrine concentrations (unfortunately unbound lumefantrine concentrations were not measured in any of the studies included). A limitation of this study is that we were unable to use the preferred anthropometric indices for determining nutritional status [79]. As the studies pooled for this analysis were designed to assess antimalarial efficacy, most only recorded body weight on a single occasion and height was only recorded in <5 % of young children. Thus we were unable to differentiate acute under-nutrition (low weight-for-height or BMI-for-age) from chronic under-nutrition (low height-for-age), or distinguish tall, thin children from short, well-proportioned children.

At currently recommended doses, the absorption of lumefantrine appears close to saturation [40], or constrained by limited solubility. This was confirmed by the small effect of body weight-adjusted (mg/kg) dose in our study. Thus a simple increase in the number of tablets given at each twice daily dose may not ensure adequate lumefantrine exposure. Administering the same recommended six doses of artemether-lumefantrine over 5 days, dosing at 0, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, has been shown to increase the area under the lumefantrine concentration time-curve (AUC) in Asian adults [6, 7, 30], but this may compromise adherence. Further studies of higher, more frequent, or prolonged dosage regimens are needed to determine which dosing adjustments would ensure that all young children, including those that are underweight, could safely achieve the day 7 concentrations required to achieve ≥95 % cure rates.

Achieving acceptable cure rates is particularly challenging for underweight young children with higher parasite densities (>100,000/uL), who require higher day 7 concentrations (up to 256 ng/ml). Hyperparasitemia is an important source of antimalarial drug resistance [80] and occurs commonly in patients with otherwise uncomplicated malaria. In the large WWARN pooled analysis of 14,327 patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine, 9.5 % had parasite densities above 100,000/uL [67]. This 9.5 % prevalence would be an underestimate of all uncomplicated hyperparasitemia, as the WHO recommends excluding hyperparasitemic patients from therapeutic efficacy studies [59]. To exclude uncomplicated hyperparasitemia, microscopy should be used rather than rapid diagnostic tests when feasible, particularly in very young and underweight children. The administration of at least two doses of parenteral artesunate is the preferred treatment for hyperparasitemic patients [1], and the threshold of >250,000/uL in the current WHO definition of uncomplicated malaria in areas of moderate to high transmission intensity [59] appears too high for very young children, particularly if they are underweight.

The risk of artemether-lumefantrine failure was, as expected, highest in western Cambodia, the epicenter of antimalarial drug resistance [81, 82], where day 7 lumefantrine concentrations >1,616 ng/ml appear necessary to achieve acceptable cure rates even for very low baseline parasite densities (<5,000/μL). It is of concern that patients in the very low transmission areas included in this study also required high lumefantrine concentrations (>1,000 ng/ml) to cure even low parasite densities. In these areas it seems unlikely that artemether-lumefantrine dosage regimens could be adjusted to achieve the predicted lumefantrine exposure needed to ensure acceptable cure rates for parasite densities of up to 100,000/μL (the WHO definition of uncomplicated malaria in areas of low intensity malaria transmission). The very low transmission intensity areas included in this analysis comprised only two small studies in Thailand, and data on the frequency of the pfmdr1 86 N allele and copy number in our study were insufficient for determining the extent to which these findings simply reflect high levels of lumefantrine resistance, or whether the lack of immunity in these areas of very low transmission intensity further compromises therapeutic efficacy. The WWARN pooled analysis of the relationship between lumefantrine-resistant polymorphisms in pfcrt and pfmdr1 and artemether-lumefantrine treatment response showed that presence of the pfmdr1 gene N86 (adjusted HR 4.74; 95 % CI 2.29 to 9.78) and increased pfmdr1 copy number (adjusted HR 6.52; 95 % CI 2.36 to 17.97) were significant independent risk factors for recrudescence in patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine [83].

Even after adjusting for covariates, including site effects (for Cambodia and the nearby very low intensity transmission areas included in our study) and artemether-lumefantrine (mg/kg) dose, slow early parasitological treatment response more than doubled the risk of recrudescence. Artemether pharmacokinetic data were not available for this pooled analysis, and previous publications have been inconsistent. While some reported that higher artemether or dihydroartemisinin exposure was found to decrease parasite clearance time, others have found no clinically meaningful correlation between exposure and parasite clearance times [44, 84, 85]. Whether due to artemisinin resistance and/or inadequate artemether/dihydroartemisinin exposure, a higher residual parasite biomass remains that the partner lumefantrine is less able to clear. Thus ACT treatment failure rates increase, risking the development and spread of resistance to both the artemisinin and lumefantrine components. The slow parasite clearance rates that characterize artemisinin resistance were originally documented in western Cambodia [81, 82]. Despite containment efforts, artemisinin resistance has now been confirmed in five countries across mainland Southeast Asia [86-88], where a total of 331,551 P. falciparum malaria cases were notified in 2013 [4], highlighting the urgent need for novel antimalarials.

The simplicity of collecting a single pharmacokinetic sample per patient as an accurate measure of lumefantrine exposure is very appealing, particularly in remote field study sites with minimal infrastructure. The feasibility of pharmacokinetic sampling is further enhanced by the use of capillary blood specimens dried on filter paper, although this method is more vulnerable to inter-operator variability and the effects of anemia. This pooled analysis shows that this matrix is less optimal, being 2- to 3-fold more variable, and 5-fold less sensitive. However, with the therapeutic threshold of 200 ng/ml, the filter paper limit of quantification of 25 ng/ml should be sufficient for the measurements of day 7, if not later, concentrations. Careful attention to dried blood spot sample collection methods may reduce inter-operator variability.

As the determinants of therapeutic response are multi-factorial, studies of the pharmacokinetics of antimalarial drugs often have inadequate power to define optimal dosage recommendations. Pooled individual patient PK-PD data analysis makes the best use of available data for distinguishing treatment failures resulting from inadequate drug exposure from those caused by drug-resistant parasites. The main limitation of pooling individual patient pharmacokinetic data is differences in assay methods between studies. Only two of the studies included in this pooled analysis [42, 44] used mass spectrometry to determine lumefantrine concentrations; early attempts failed due to matrix effects [40]. More recently, several tandem mass spectrometry methods reported having addressed this issue [42, 51, 89]. The risks of one study compromising the overall results of a pooled analysis decrease as the number of studies included increase; in our sensitivity analysis excluding each study one at a time, no individual study was shown to be influential and the main results were shown to be highly robust. Heterogeneity can be reduced by method standardization following the WHO/WWARN consensus document, Methods and techniques for assessing exposure to antimalarial drugs in clinical field studies [90]. The WWARN reference material program and, for more stable antimalarial medicines, external proficiency testing have further contributed to reducing inconsistency between antimalarial assays [91].

Dose optimization is best informed when the pharmacokinetic parameters that drive artemether-lumefantrine exposure, particularly bioavailability (including doses above which absorption becomes saturated), volume of distribution and clearance, are characterized adequately in patients with uncomplicated malaria, including high-risk populations. Thus all available drug concentration-over-time data, and not just day 7 concentrations, need to be analyzed using a population PK-PD model. In collaboration with researchers worldwide, WWARN has obtained data from 4,122 malaria patients with a total of 9,258 lumefantrine concentrations (Fig. 1). This WWARN study group will continue to explore this expanded data set to answer key questions more fully, such as: ‘can Day 7 lumefantrine concentrations serve as a convenient surrogate for AUCs in all key target populations?’; ‘what proportion of treatment failures are explained by inadequate drug exposure?’; and ‘which modified dosage regimens should be investigated for important target populations, such as pregnant women, underweight young children or patients with co-morbid conditions (such as HIV/AIDS), or those who are taking drugs that reduce antimalarial exposure (such as efavirenz or rifampicin)?’.

Conclusions

This study provides a day 7 blood or plasma concentration threshold for evaluating whether individual treatment failures reflect inadequate drug exposure or parasite resistance, comparing artemether-lumefantrine formulations, and informing optimal artemether-lumefantrine dosing regimens. Although current dosing recommendations are adequate for most patients with acute P. falciparum malaria, three patient groups are at increased risk of treatment failure: very young children, particularly those that are underweight-for-age; patients with high parasitemias; and patients in very low transmission intensity areas with emerging parasite resistance. Treatment adherence and response should be monitored more closely, and higher, more frequent, or prolonged dosage regimens need to be evaluated in very young children, particularly if malnourished, and in patients with hyperparasitemia. Novel antimalarials are needed for very low transmission intensity areas with emerging artemisinin resistance.