Yimin Zhang1, Jun Yang2, Hongjuan Li3, Yihua Wu4, Honghe Zhang4, Wenhu Chen1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Hangzhou 310022, China. 2. School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou 310016, China ; School of Medicine, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310058, China. 3. School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou 310016, China. 4. School of Medicine, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310058, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis and early detection is crucial for improving patient prognosis. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of single test of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA, as well as combination test in pancreatic cancer detection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Wanfang databases for studies that evaluated the diagnostic validity of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA between January 1990 and September 2014. Data were analyzed by Meta-Disc and STATA software. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies including 3497 participants, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were considered for analysis. The pooled sensitivities for CA19-9, CA242, and CEA were 75.4 (95% CI: 73.4-77.4), 67.8 (95% CI: 65.5-70), and 39.5 (95% CI: 37.3-41.7), respectively. The pooled specificities of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA were 77.6 (95% CI: 75.4-79.7), 83 (95% CI: 81-85), and 81.3 (95% CI: 79.3-83.2), respectively. Parallel combination of CA19-9+CA242 has a higher sensitivity (89, 95% CI: 80-95) without impairing the specificity (75, 95% CI: 67-82). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that CA242 and CA19-9 have better performance in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer than CEA. Furthermore, parallel combination test of CA19-9+CA242 could be of better diagnostic value than individual CA242 or CA19-9 test.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis and early detection is crucial for improving patient prognosis. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of single test of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA, as well as combination test in pancreatic cancer detection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Wanfang databases for studies that evaluated the diagnostic validity of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA between January 1990 and September 2014. Data were analyzed by Meta-Disc and STATA software. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies including 3497 participants, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were considered for analysis. The pooled sensitivities for CA19-9, CA242, and CEA were 75.4 (95% CI: 73.4-77.4), 67.8 (95% CI: 65.5-70), and 39.5 (95% CI: 37.3-41.7), respectively. The pooled specificities of CA19-9, CA242, and CEA were 77.6 (95% CI: 75.4-79.7), 83 (95% CI: 81-85), and 81.3 (95% CI: 79.3-83.2), respectively. Parallel combination of CA19-9+CA242 has a higher sensitivity (89, 95% CI: 80-95) without impairing the specificity (75, 95% CI: 67-82). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that CA242 and CA19-9 have better performance in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer than CEA. Furthermore, parallel combination test of CA19-9+CA242 could be of better diagnostic value than individual CA242 or CA19-9 test.
Entities:
Keywords:
CA19-9; CA242; CEA; meta-analysis; pancreatic cancer
Authors: X G Ni; X F Bai; Y L Mao; Y F Shao; J X Wu; Y Shan; C F Wang; J Wang; Y T Tian; Q Liu; D K Xu; P Zhao Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: M J Duffy; C Sturgeon; R Lamerz; C Haglund; V L Holubec; R Klapdor; A Nicolini; O Topolcan; V Heinemann Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Katherine S Yang; Hyungsoon Im; Seonki Hong; Ilaria Pergolini; Andres Fernandez Del Castillo; Rui Wang; Susan Clardy; Chen-Han Huang; Craig Pille; Soldano Ferrone; Robert Yang; Cesar M Castro; Hakho Lee; Carlos Fernandez Del Castillo; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Petr Karasek; Natalia Gablo; Jan Hlavsa; Igor Kiss; Petra Vychytilova-Faltejskova; Marketa Hermanova; Zdenek Kala; Ondrej Slaby; Vladimir Prochazka Journal: Cancer Genomics Proteomics Date: 2018 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.069
Authors: Katherine S Yang; Debora Ciprani; Aileen O'Shea; Andrew S Liss; Robert Yang; Sarah Fletcher-Mercaldo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 22.682