Katherine S Yang1, Debora Ciprani2, Aileen O'Shea3, Andrew S Liss2, Robert Yang1, Sarah Fletcher-Mercaldo4, Mari Mino-Kenudson5, Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo2, Ralph Weissleder6. 1. Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ralph_weissleder@hms.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advances in cross-sectional imaging have resulted in increased detection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and their management remains controversial. At present, there is no reliable noninvasive method to distinguish between indolent and high risk IPMNs. We performed extracellular vesicle (EV) analysis to identify markers of malignancy in an attempt to better stratify these lesions. METHODS: Using a novel ultrasensitive digital extracellular vesicle screening technique (DEST), we measured putative biomarkers of malignancy (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, Das-1, STMN1, TSP1, TSP2, EGFR, EpCAM, GPC1, WNT-2, EphA2, S100A4, PSCA, MUC13, ZEB1, PLEC1, HOOK1, PTPN6, and FBN1) in EV from patient-derived cell lines and then on circulating EV obtained from peripheral blood drawn from patients with IPMNs. We enrolled a total of 133 patients in two separate cohorts: a clinical discovery cohort (n = 86) and a validation cohort (n = 47). RESULTS: From 16 validated EV proteins in plasma samples collected from the discovery cohort, only MUC5AC showed significantly higher levels in high-grade lesions. Of the 11 patients with invasive IPMN (inv/HG), 9 had high MUC5AC expression in plasma EV of the 11 patients with high-grade dysplasia alone, only 1 had high MUC5AC expression (sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%). These findings were corroborated in a separate validation cohort. The addition of MUC5AC as a biomarker to imaging and high-riskstigmata allowed detection of all cases requiring surgery, whereas imaging and high-risk stigmata alone would have missed 5 of 14 cases (36%). CONCLUSIONS: MUC5AC in circulating EV can predict the presence of invasive carcinoma within IPMN. This approach has the potential to improve the management and follow-up of patients with IPMN including avoiding unnecessary surgery.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advances in cross-sectional imaging have resulted in increased detection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and their management remains controversial. At present, there is no reliable noninvasive method to distinguish between indolent and high risk IPMNs. We performed extracellular vesicle (EV) analysis to identify markers of malignancy in an attempt to better stratify these lesions. METHODS: Using a novel ultrasensitive digital extracellular vesicle screening technique (DEST), we measured putative biomarkers of malignancy (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, Das-1, STMN1, TSP1, TSP2, EGFR, EpCAM, GPC1, WNT-2, EphA2, S100A4, PSCA, MUC13, ZEB1, PLEC1, HOOK1, PTPN6, and FBN1) in EV from patient-derived cell lines and then on circulating EV obtained from peripheral blood drawn from patients with IPMNs. We enrolled a total of 133 patients in two separate cohorts: a clinical discovery cohort (n = 86) and a validation cohort (n = 47). RESULTS: From 16 validated EV proteins in plasma samples collected from the discovery cohort, only MUC5AC showed significantly higher levels in high-grade lesions. Of the 11 patients with invasive IPMN (inv/HG), 9 had high MUC5AC expression in plasma EV of the 11 patients with high-grade dysplasia alone, only 1 had high MUC5AC expression (sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%). These findings were corroborated in a separate validation cohort. The addition of MUC5AC as a biomarker to imaging and high-riskstigmata allowed detection of all cases requiring surgery, whereas imaging and high-risk stigmata alone would have missed 5 of 14 cases (36%). CONCLUSIONS: MUC5AC in circulating EV can predict the presence of invasive carcinoma within IPMN. This approach has the potential to improve the management and follow-up of patients with IPMN including avoiding unnecessary surgery.
Authors: Masao Tanaka; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Terumi Kamisawa; Jin Young Jang; Philippe Levy; Takao Ohtsuka; Roberto Salvia; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Minoru Tada; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Marc A Attiyeh; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Mohammad Al Efishat; Anne A Eaton; Mithat Gönen; Ruqayyah Batts; Ilaria Pergolini; Neda Rezaee; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Ralph H Hruban; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Christopher L Wolfgang; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sheng Pan; Ru Chen; David A Crispin; Damon May; Tyler Stevens; Martin W McIntosh; Mary P Bronner; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Bindhu Madhavan; Shijing Yue; Uwe Galli; Sanyukta Rana; Wolfgang Gross; Miryam Müller; Nathalia A Giese; Holger Kalthoff; Thomas Becker; Markus W Büchler; Margot Zöller Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sébastien Gaujoux; Murray F Brennan; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Mark Schattner; Christopher DiMaio; Maria Janakos; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Ru Chen; Eugene C Yi; Samuel Donohoe; Sheng Pan; Jimmy Eng; Kelly Cooke; David A Crispin; Zhaoli Lane; David R Goodlett; Mary P Bronner; Ruedi Aebersold; Teresa A Brentnall Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Simeon Springer; Yuxuan Wang; Marco Dal Molin; David L Masica; Yuchen Jiao; Isaac Kinde; Amanda Blackford; Siva P Raman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Tyler Tomita; Noushin Niknafs; Christopher Douville; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra; Mark A Schattner; C Max Schmidt; Michele Yip-Schneider; Oscar W Cummings; Randall E Brand; Herbert J Zeh; Aatur D Singhi; Aldo Scarpa; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Giuseppe Zamboni; Massimo Falconi; Jin-Young Jang; Sun-Whe Kim; Wooil Kwon; Seung-Mo Hong; Ki-Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Niall Swan; Jean Murphy; Justin Geoghegan; William Brugge; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Richard Schulick; Barish H Edil; Volkan Adsay; Jorge Paulino; Jeanin van Hooft; Shinichi Yachida; Satoshi Nara; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Kenji Yamao; Susuma Hijioka; Schalk van der Merwe; Michael Goggins; Marcia Irene Canto; Nita Ahuja; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Matthew J Weiss; John Cameron; Meredith Pittman; James R Eshleman; Luis A Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Rachel Karchin; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein; Anne Marie Lennon Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Leonel Pekarek; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Cielo Garcia-Montero; Miguel A Saez; Ines Barquero-Pozanco; Laura Del Hierro-Marlasca; Patricia de Castro Martinez; Adoración Romero-Bazán; Miguel A Alvarez-Mon; Jorge Monserrat; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Julia Buján; Melchor Alvarez-Mon; Luis G Guijarro; Miguel A Ortega Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Scott Ferguson; Katherine S Yang; Piotr Zelga; Andrew S Liss; Jonathan C T Carlson; Carlos Fernandez Del Castillo; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 14.957