Literature DB >> 21883131

Performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy.

T Piepho1, K Fortmueller, F M Heid, I Schmidtmann, C Werner, R R Noppens.   

Abstract

We applied the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in 52 consecutive patients who were found to have an unexpected Cormack and Lehane grade-3 (n = 49) and grade-4 (n = 3) laryngeal view with the Macintosh laryngoscope. The glottic view improved in 49 (94%) patients using the C-MAC. Tracheal intubation was successful in 49 of 52 patients (94%). In one patient, tracheal intubation failed using the C-MAC despite the presence of a Cormack and Lehane grade-2. These results suggest that the C-MAC videolaryngoscope has a role as a rescue device in cases of an initially difficult laryngeal view.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21883131     DOI： 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06872.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN： 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  30 in total

1.  Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Gamze Sarkılar; Mehmet Sargın; Tuba Berra Sarıtaş; Hale Borazan; Funda Gök; Alper Kılıçaslan; Şeref Otelcioğlu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 2.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Rapid sequence induction and intubation in patients with risk of aspiration : Recommendations for action for practical management of anesthesia].

Authors:  C Eichelsbacher; H Ilper; R Noppens; J Hinkelbein; T Loop
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].

Authors:  K Ruetzler; S Imach; M Weiss; T Haas; A R Schmidt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Airway management in intensive care units in Rhineland-Palatinate : Evolution over five years].

Authors:  T Piepho; T Härer; L Ellermann; R R Noppens
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Emergency Neurological Life Support: Airway, Ventilation, and Sedation.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Becky Riggs; David B Seder
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  [Out-of-hospital airway management in trauma patients : Experiences with the C-MAC® video laryngoscope].

Authors:  B Hossfeld; A Jongebloed; L Lampl; M Helm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Asad E Patanwala; John C Sakles
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.

Authors:  Alper Kılıçaslan; Ahmet Topal; Atilla Erol; Sema Tuncer Uzun
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.