Literature DB >> 26379891

Can the peak E2/follicle ratio be a quantitative indicator of pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive cycles? A retrospective study.

Dan Hu1, Xiyuan Dong1, Min Xiong1, Ting Xiong1, Bo Huang1, Dan Zeng1, Jihui Ai1, Hanwang Zhang1.   

Abstract

As one of the limited reference parameters for the appropriate timing of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) priming and embryo transfer (ET), peak serum estradiol (E2) level and related parameters have been considered to be a possible marker of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. To our knowledge, few reports have investigated the correlation between the ratio of peak serum E2 to the number of follicles ≥ 14 mm on the day of hCG administration (i.e., the E2/fol. ratio) and the miscarriage rate (MR) in assisted reproductive cycles. In this study, a total of 1376 cycles were examined and grouped into quartiles by E2/fol. ratio. The patient characteristics, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) performance, and IVF/ICSI results were compared between the four groups. Patients were further categorized as younger than 35 years of age or 35 years of age and older. The association between the E2/fol. ratio and the implantation rate (IR) or MR was examined using the Mantel-Haenszel test for each group. We found that the E2/fol. ratio correlated with the IR and MR for women younger than 35 years of age. There was a statistically significant increase in the IR with E2/fol. ratio between 279.83 and 552.28 pg/ml, and women with an E2/fol. ratio > 552.28 pg/ml were more likely to suffer miscarriages. Our data support a role for cryopreservation of all embryos when E2/fol. ratio exceeds 552.28 pg/ml for women younger than 35 years of age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART; E2/fol. ratio; implantation rate; miscarriage rate

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379891      PMCID: PMC4565274     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of the role of serum luteinizing hormone and estradiol response to follicle-stimulating hormone on in vitro fertilization treatment outcome.

Authors:  E Loumaye; P Engrand; C M Howles; L O'Dea
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Cumulative impact of adding frozen-thawed cycles to single versus double fresh embryo transfers.

Authors:  Kersti Lundin; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1999 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Osamu Kato; Nami Kawasaki; Daniel Bodri; Tomoko Kuroda; Satoshi Kawachiya; Keiichi Kato; Yuji Takehara
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Pierre Jouannet; Céline Davy; Juliette Guibert; Vivian Viallon; Sylvie Epelboin; Jean-Marie Kunstmann; Catherine Patrat
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos.

Authors:  F Ubaldi; L Rienzi; E Baroni; S Ferrero; M Iacobelli; M G Minasi; F Sapienza; F Martinez; R Anniballo; L Cobellis; J Tesarik; E Greco
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data.

Authors:  U-B Wennerholm; V Söderström-Anttila; C Bergh; K Aittomäki; J Hazekamp; K-G Nygren; A Selbing; A Loft
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Theodoros Kalampokas; Jill Davidson; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Chih Chi Chuang; Chin-Der Chen; Kuang-Han Chao; Shee-Uan Chen; Hong-Nerng Ho; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  More is not always better-lower estradiol to mature oocyte ratio improved IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Nardin Aslih; Mediea Michaeli; Diana Mashenko; Adrian Ellenbogen; Oshrit Lebovitz; Yuval Atzmon; Einat Shalom-Paz
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.335

2.  Analysis of the Number of Euploid Embryos in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles With Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol.

Authors:  Gang Li; Yifang Wu; Wenbin Niu; Jiawei Xu; Linli Hu; Hao Shi; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Relationship between a low ratio of serum estradiol to follicle number and fertility treatment outcomes: A retrospective cohort study of 516 cases.

Authors:  Qiaoyao Huang; Yanru Niu; Lihua Xu; Bi Chen; Yunshan Zhang; Li Jun Song; Xia Jing; Bing Wei; Tianzhong Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.