Literature DB >> 19446806

Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers.

Patricia Fauque1, Pierre Jouannet, Céline Davy, Juliette Guibert, Vivian Viallon, Sylvie Epelboin, Jean-Marie Kunstmann, Catherine Patrat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of elective single embryo transfer (e-SET) compared to a double embryo transfer (DET) in a selected population including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles.
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized study.
SETTING: Department of reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Elective single embryo transfer was proposed to women < 36 years with adequate ovarian function, in their first or second IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempt with ejaculated sperm, with at least 4 mature oocytes and 2 fertilized top quality embryos. Patients who refused e-SET had two top embryos transferred (DET group). INTERVENTION(S): Medical management and IVF-ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative delivery rate, twin delivery rate, obstetrical and neonatal outcome. RESULT(S): According to patients' decision, 53 women had an e-SET and 98 a DET. The cumulative delivery rate per patient was 54.7% in the e-SET group and 49.0% in the DET group (P>0.05). Twin delivery rate was significantly different between the two groups (3.5% versus 37.5% respectively, P<0.05). Neonatal outcome in twins resulting from IVF-ICSI was found to be poorer than in singletons, considering the mean gestational age, mode of delivery, birthweight, and risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission for the infants. CONCLUSION(S): In a selected population, the elective transfer of one embryo with high implantation potential helped to avoid twin pregnancies without decreasing delivery rate. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446806     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  [Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].

Authors:  Ling Sun; Zhi-Heng Chen; Min-Na Yin; Yu Deng; Jun Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

3.  Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Matthew T Connell; Kevin S Richter; Christina I Ramirez; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; Robert J Stillman; Eric A Widra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Elective single-embryo transfer improves cumulative pregnancy outcome in young patients but not in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  Akihisa Fujimoto; Kaoru Morishima; Miyuki Harada; Tetsuya Hirata; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Can the peak E2/follicle ratio be a quantitative indicator of pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive cycles? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Xiyuan Dong; Min Xiong; Ting Xiong; Bo Huang; Dan Zeng; Jihui Ai; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Greene Donald Royster; Kavitha Krishnamoorthy; John M Csokmay; Belinda J Yauger; Rebecca J Chason; Alan H DeCherney; Erin F Wolff; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Catherine Patrat; Dominique Thépot; Nathalie Peynot; Patricia Fauque; Nathalie Daniel; Patricia Diabangouaya; Jean-Philippe Wolf; Jean-Paul Renard; Véronique Duranthon; Edith Heard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Allison S Mneimneh; Kiran M Perkins; Denise J Jamieson; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Impact on ICSI outcomes of adding 24 h of in vitro culture before testicular sperm freezing: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Laurent Desch; Céline Bruno; Charlène Herbemont; Frédéric Michel; Shaliha Bechoua; Sophie Girod; Paul Sagot; Patricia Fauque
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2015-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.