| Literature DB >> 26379032 |
Helena Kellett-Clarke1, Monika Stegmann1, A Neil Barclay1, Clive Metcalfe1.
Abstract
CD44 is the primary leukocyte cell surface receptor forEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26379032 PMCID: PMC4574955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A) Crystal structure of the HABD of murine CD44 in complex with an HA 8-mer (adapted from PDB ID:2JCQ).
The protein backbone is represented as a blue cartoon. The HA 8-mer is shown as pink sticks. Disulfide bonds are shown as yellow sticks and the cysteine residues from which they are formed are numbered according to their position in the mouse CD44 sequence (human numbering is shown in parenthesis). (B) For each disulfide bond dark grey bars show solvent accessibility and light grey bars show bond strain energy calculated from the PDB coordinates (PDB ID:2JCQ for mouse and 1UUH for human, the coordinates for HA were removed from 2JCQ prior to analysis) using (http://powcs.med.unsw.edu.au/research/adult-cancer-program/services-resources/disulfide-bond-analysis-tool/disulfide-bond).
Fig 2Aligned 3D total ion current chromatograms using Progenesis QI in the area of chromatographic space where MPB labelled GFETCR elutes for (A) control 2B4 cells and (B) TCEP-HCl reduced 2B4 cells.
The peak corresponding to MPB labelled GFETCR is outlined in black and is visibly larger in the TCEP-HCl reduced cells. Other peptides are seen in both the control and TCEP-HCl reduced samples, ones with increased area after TCEP-HCl treatment suggests they are from proteins containing labile disulfide bonds.
Cell types and treatments for which the allosteric disulfide has been observed.
| Species | Cell Type | Treatment | HA peptide | Labile? | Globular peptide | Labile? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | 2B4 | Control | GFETCR | No | TEAADLCQAFNSTLPTMDQMK | No |
| TCEP-HCl | Yes | No | ||||
| Trx1 | Yes | No | ||||
| GILT | Yes | No | ||||
| Human | Platelets | Control | ALSIGFETCR | No | TEAADLCK | - |
| TCEP-HCl | Yes | - | ||||
| DTT | Yes | - | ||||
| Human | MEG-01 | Control | ALSIGFETCR | No | TEAADLCK | - |
| TCEP-HCl | Yes | No | ||||
| Human | Namalwa | Control | ALSIGFETCR | No | TEAADLCK | - |
| TCEP-HCl | Yes | - | ||||
| Human | PBMC | Control | ALSIGFETCR | Yes | TEAADLCK | No |
| TCEP-HCl | Yes | No | ||||
| SEA+IL-2 | Yes | No |
a gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase.
b MLR supplemented with staphylococcal enterotoxin A super antigen.
c–is not detected in the mass spectrometry run.
Fig 3The Cys77-Cys97 disulfide bond is the most reactive in hCD44-Fc chimera after treatment with TCEP-HCl and Trx1 followed by kinetic trapping with NEM.
(A) Extracted ion chromatograms for NEM and D5-NEM labelled ALSIGFETCR in non reduced control and TCEP reduced hCD44-Fc. In the control the NEM labelled peptide has a much smaller area than the D5-labelled peptide showing that the Cys77-Cys97 disulfide bond is predominantly oxidised. After reduction with TCEP the area of NEM labelled peptide is increased relative to D5-NEM labelled peptide indicating that the disulfide bond has been significantly reduced. Peak integration boundaries are shown as dotted lines and the times of any MS/MS switching events are indicated. (B) Summary of the ratio of the extracted ion chromatograms for NEM labelled to D5-NEM labelled peptides. Peptide ALSIGFETCR contains Cys77 is from the disulfide bond in the HA binding groove. TEAADLCK contains Cys53 and is from the disulfide buried in the core of the link domain. PEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVK and NQVSLTCLVK are from the Fc region of the chimera. Columns represent the fold change of the NEM/D5-NEM ratio of each peptide for TCEP-HCl reduced chimera (medium grey), Trx1 reduced chimera (light grey) relative to non-reduced control chimera (dark grey). Mean and SEM of ratios from two reductions are shown.
Summary of NEM/D5-NEM peptide ratios and fold changes relative to controls determined from the summed extracted ion chromatogram areas of the indicated peptides calculated in S1 Table.
| NEM/D5-NEM ratio | NEM/D5 NEM ratio change relative to control | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peptide | Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | ||||||||
| Control | TCEP | Trx1 | Control | TCEP | Trx1 | Control | TCEP | Trx1 | Control | TCEP | Trx1 | |
| ALSIGFETCR | 0.05 | 1.21 | 1.89 | 0.15 | 2.81 | 1.88 | 1.00 | 22.83 | 35.66 | 1.00 | 18.45 | 12.37 |
| TEAADLCK | 0.06 | 0.47 | 1.31 | 0.24 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 7.88 | 22.19 | 1.00 | 4.07 | 4.05 |
| NQVSLTCLVK | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 2.37 | 5.85 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 2.32 |
| TPEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVK | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 2.66 | 1.00 | 1.48 | 0.66 |
Fig 4TCEP-HCl reduction of CD44 inhibits binding to HA.
(A) hCD44-Fc and (B) mCD44-Fc binding to plates coated with 50 μg/ml HA. Columns represent non reduced control CD44-Fc (dark grey) and TCEP-HCl reduced CD44-Fc (light grey). Mean and SEM of peptide chromatographic areas from three experiments are shown, the differences between non reduced and TCEP-HCl reduced chimera: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Titrations of Trx1 reduced (C) human CD44-Fc and (D) mouse CD44-Fc binding to plates coated with 50 μg/ml HA. For both mouse and human CD44-Fc titrations the binding curves represent non reduced control CD44-Fc (black circles) and Trx1 reduced CD44-Fc (black squares). Binding curves are constructed from data of three independent experiments and equilibrium dissociation constants were determined by fitting to a single binding site model.
Fig 5Levels of CD44 determined by flow cytometry analysis of (A) untransfected CHO K1 cells and (B) hCD44 transfected CHO cells.
Light grey trace is isotype control, black trace is anti-CD44. (C) Non reduced SDS-PAGE gel showing reduced proteins on the surface of hCD44 transfected CHO cells after reduction (green bands) overlaid with a western blot of CD44 (red). (D) non reduced SDS-PAGE gel of eluted proteins which contain reduced disulfide bonds (green bands) from a CD44 immunoprecipitation of hCD44 transfected CHO cells that had been reduced with either TCEP-HCl or Trx1.
Fig 6Cell adhesion assay showing the effect of TCEP-HCl and Trx1 reduction of untransfected and hCD44 transfected CHO cells binding to HA coated plates.
Binding data are compositions of three independent experiments all normalised assuming non reduced CHO-hCD44 binding to HA coated wells as 100% response. Mean and SEM of total fluorescence are shown. The differences from control: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001