Literature DB >> 9721887

Site-specific de-N-glycosylation of CD44 can activate hyaluronan binding, and CD44 activation states show distinct threshold densities for hyaluronan binding.

N M English1, J F Lesley, R Hyman.   

Abstract

CD44 is a cell surface receptor for the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan (HA). Not all CD44-positive cells bind HA, and binding ability is strictly regulated. Three different HA binding states have been defined: inactive, inducible (by certain CD44-specific monoclonal antibodies), and constitutively active. The observation that sets of genetically related cell lines representing different HA binding states showed correlated differences in N-glycosylation of CD44, and that inhibition of N-glycosylation enhanced HA binding (Lesley et al., J. Exp. Med., 182: 431-437, 1995) led us to examine directly whether specific N-glycosylation site modifications were involved in regulating the HA binding function. CD44-negative, -active, and inducible cell lines were stably transfected with mutant constructs in which each of the five N-glycosylation sites of murine CD44 had been separately inactivated. Ability to bind soluble HA was examined over a range of CD44 expression levels. For the active cell line, AKR1, transfectants for all N-glycosylation mutants bound HA as well as did transfectants for wild type CD44. No inhibitory effects of inactivating specific N-glycosylation sites were observed. HA binding was activated when two of the mutant constructs were transfected into a novel CD44-negative inducible cell line. Inactivation of N-glycosylation sites at residues 25 or 120 converted the inducible cell line to constitutively active, whereas inactivation of other sites had little or no effect. Fusion proteins secreted from inactive, inducible, or active cell lines were purified, bound to beads, and assayed for HA binding activity by flow cytometric analysis. Fusion proteins derived from inactive, inducible, and constitutively active cells exhibited three distinguishable "threshold" densities required for HA binding ability. The results imply that the CD44 molecules produced in cells in these three activation states have intrinsic differences in HA binding function. Treatment of the fusion proteins with neuraminidase altered the HA binding state, and glycosylation mutations that affected the phenotype of the inducible cell line lowered the threshold required for HA binding of CD44-immunoglobulin fusion proteins derived from the inducible cell line. Thus, alterations of glycosylation of CD44 itself can affect HA binding ability as manifested by a change in HA binding state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9721887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  37 in total

1.  Significance of VLA-4-VCAM-1 interaction and CD44 for transendothelial invasion in a bone marrow metastatic myeloma model.

Authors:  T Okada; R G Hawley; M Kodaka; H Okuno
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Inhibition of CD44 N- and O-linked glycosylation decreases endometrial cell lines attachment to peritoneal mesothelial cells.

Authors:  Allison K Rodgers; Anitha Nair; Peter A Binkley; Rajeshwar Tekmal; Robert S Schenken
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  CD44 receptor unfolding enhances binding by freeing basic amino acids to contact carbohydrate ligand.

Authors:  Amanda J Favreau; Christina E Faller; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Distinctive properties of the hyaluronan-binding domain in the lymphatic endothelial receptor Lyve-1 and their implications for receptor function.

Authors:  Suneale Banerji; Branwen R S Hide; John R James; Martin E M Noble; David G Jackson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The Gardos effect drives erythrocyte senescence and leads to Lu/BCAM and CD44 adhesion molecule activation.

Authors:  Thomas R L Klei; Jill J Dalimot; Boukje M Beuger; Martijn Veldthuis; Fatima Ait Ichou; Paul J J H Verkuijlen; Iris M Seignette; Peter C Ligthart; Taco W Kuijpers; Rob van Zwieten; Robin van Bruggen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 6.  Cancer stem cell marker glycosylation: Nature, function and significance.

Authors:  Brody W Mallard; Joe Tiralongo
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  Terminal sialic acids on CD44 N-glycans can block hyaluronan binding by forming competing intramolecular contacts with arginine sidechains.

Authors:  Christina E Faller; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-09-29

Review 8.  CD44 and HCELL: preventing hematogenous metastasis at step 1.

Authors:  Pieter P Jacobs; Robert Sackstein
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 9.  Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Salomé S Pinho; Celso A Reis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Menstrual endometrial cells from women with endometriosis demonstrate increased adherence to peritoneal cells and increased expression of CD44 splice variants.

Authors:  Jason S Griffith; Ya-Guang Liu; Rajeshwar R Tekmal; Peter A Binkley; Alan E C Holden; Robert S Schenken
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.