Literature DB >> 26372185

Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases.

H Giorgi1, R Prébet2, M Delhaye2, N Aurouer3, P Mangione3, B Blondel1, P Tropiano1, S Fuentes4, H-F Parent2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interbody fusion is the gold standard treatment for the management of numerous diseases of the spine. Minimally invasive techniques may be more beneficial than conventional techniques. The main goal of this study was to report the one-year postoperative results of a series of posterior lumbar interbody fusions by a minimally invasive technique in relation to improvement in functional outcome, interbody fusion and morbidity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and May 2013, 182 patients treated by minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) were included in this prospective multicenter study. Clinical assessment was based on a comparison of the preoperative and one-year postoperative Oswestry (ODI), SF-12 and Quebec Scores and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Surgical and postoperative follow-up data were evaluated. Radiological assessment was based preoperative and one-year postoperative full spine teleradiographs. Interbody fusion at one-year was systematically evaluated by CT scan.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-two patients were included, mean age 58.9 years old. Surgery lasted a mean 101 minutes, mean preoperative bleeding was 143 mL, and mean radiation exposure was 247.4 cGy/cm(2). The rate of postoperative complications was 7.7%. The ODI, the Quebec Score, the SF-12 and the VAS were all significantly improved at one-year (P<0.0001). The rate of fusion was 72.6% at the final follow-up. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients with and without fusion. DISCUSSION: The one-year postoperative radiological results and functional outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion are satisfactory. The benefits of this minimally invasive approach are mainly found in the first 6 postoperative months. Successful radiological interbody fusion was not correlated to functional outcome at the final follow-up.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Morbidity; Posterior lumbar fusion; Prospective study; Transforaminal interbody fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372185     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  8 in total

1.  Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.

Authors:  Philipp Poppenborg; Ulf Liljenqvist; Georg Gosheger; Albert Schulze Boevingloh; Lukas Lampe; Sebastian Schmeil; Tobias L Schulte; Tobias Lange
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age.

Authors:  M Kamenova; E Li; J Soleman; O Fiebig; A Mehrkens; S Schaeren
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Women Do Not Have Poorer Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Winston Shang Rong Lim; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham S. Goh; William Yeo; Zhixing Marcus Ling; Wai-Mun Yue; Chang Ming Guo; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin-Fei Zhang; Chao-Yuan Ge; Bo-Long Zheng; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Lower complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy rather than MI TLIF/other fusions for degenerative lumbar disease/spondylolisthesis: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-03-07

7.  Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.

Authors:  Sara Lener; Christoph Wipplinger; R Nick Hernandez; Ibrahim Hussain; Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jinqiu Zhao; Shujun Zhang; Xiaosong Li; Bin He; Yunsheng Ou; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.