Literature DB >> 26371493

Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious.

Jonathan A Susser1, Andy Jin1, Neil W Mulligan1.   

Abstract

Perceptual fluency manipulations influence metamemory judgments, with more fluently perceived information judged as more memorable. However, it is not always clear whether this influence is driven by actual experienced processing fluency or by beliefs about memory. The current study used an identity-priming paradigm-in which words are preceded by either matched (identical) or mismatched primes-to examine the 2 influences. Participants named and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for critical words and then completed a memory test. In Experiment 1, we briefly presented the primes and found a priming effect on naming latencies but not on JOLs. In Experiment 2, we presented the primes for longer durations and, again, found an effect on naming in addition to an effect on JOLs. A mediation analysis revealed that naming latencies did not account for the prime-JOL relationship. This pattern of results demonstrated a manipulation of perceptual fluency that influenced JOLs only when belief-based information was readily available. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371493     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.

Authors:  Miri Besken; Elif Cemre Solmaz; Meltem Karaca; Nilsu Atılgan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

2.  How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Gongxiang Chen; Chunliang Yang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-05

3.  Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.

Authors:  Zehra F Peynircioğlu; Joshua R Tatz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

4.  The limited use of the fluency heuristic: Converging evidence across different procedures.

Authors:  Rüdiger F Pohl; Edgar Erdfelder; Martha Michalkiewicz; Marta Castela; Benjamin E Hilbig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

5.  The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.

Authors:  Amber E Witherby; Sarah K Tauber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

6.  The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.

Authors:  Chunliang Yang; Bukuan Sun; David R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

7.  Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.

Authors:  Sarah K Tauber; Amber E Witherby; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

8.  The effects of emotion on younger and older adults' monitoring of learning.

Authors:  Sarah K Tauber; John Dunlosky; Heather L Urry; Philipp C Opitz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2016-09-27

9.  How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory.

Authors:  Ningxin Su; Tongtong Li; Jun Zheng; Xiao Hu; Tian Fan; Liang Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.