Michael K Magill1, David Ehrenberger2, Debra L Scammon3, Julie Day4, Tatiana Allen5, Andreu J Reall6, Rhonda W Sides7, Jaewhan Kim5. 1. University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah Michael.Magill@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Integrated Physician Network, Louisville, Colorado. 3. University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business, Department of Marketing, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. University of Utah Medical Group, Salt Lake City, Utah. 5. University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. 6. University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business, Department of Marketing, Salt Lake City, Utah. 7. Crosslin and Associates, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As medical practices transform to patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), it is important to identify the ongoing costs of maintaining these "advanced primary care" functions. A key required input is personnel effort. This study's objective was to assess direct personnel costs to practices associated with the staffing necessary to deliver PCMH functions as outlined in the National Committee for Quality Assurance Standards. METHODS: We developed a PCMH cost dimensions tool to assess costs associated with activities uniquely required to maintain PCMH functions. We interviewed practice managers, nurse supervisors, and medical directors in 20 varied primary care practices in 2 states, guided by the tool. Outcome measures included categories of staff used to perform various PCMH functions, time and personnel costs, and whether practices were delivering PCMH functions. RESULTS: Costs per full-time equivalent primary care clinician associated with PCMH functions varied across practices with an average of $7,691 per month in Utah practices and $9,658 in Colorado practices. PCMH incremental costs per encounter were $32.71 in Utah and $36.68 in Colorado. The average estimated cost per member per month for an assumed panel of 2,000 patients was $3.85 in Utah and $4.83 in Colorado. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying costs of maintaining PCMH functions will contribute to effective payment reform and to sustainability of transformation. Maintenance and ongoing support of PCMH functions require additional time and new skills, which may be provided by existing staff, additional staff, or both. Adequate compensation for ongoing and substantial incremental costs is critical for practices to sustain PCMH functions.
PURPOSE: As medical practices transform to patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), it is important to identify the ongoing costs of maintaining these "advanced primary care" functions. A key required input is personnel effort. This study's objective was to assess direct personnel costs to practices associated with the staffing necessary to deliver PCMH functions as outlined in the National Committee for Quality Assurance Standards. METHODS: We developed a PCMH cost dimensions tool to assess costs associated with activities uniquely required to maintain PCMH functions. We interviewed practice managers, nurse supervisors, and medical directors in 20 varied primary care practices in 2 states, guided by the tool. Outcome measures included categories of staff used to perform various PCMH functions, time and personnel costs, and whether practices were delivering PCMH functions. RESULTS: Costs per full-time equivalent primary care clinician associated with PCMH functions varied across practices with an average of $7,691 per month in Utah practices and $9,658 in Colorado practices. PCMH incremental costs per encounter were $32.71 in Utah and $36.68 in Colorado. The average estimated cost per member per month for an assumed panel of 2,000 patients was $3.85 in Utah and $4.83 in Colorado. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying costs of maintaining PCMH functions will contribute to effective payment reform and to sustainability of transformation. Maintenance and ongoing support of PCMH functions require additional time and new skills, which may be provided by existing staff, additional staff, or both. Adequate compensation for ongoing and substantial incremental costs is critical for practices to sustain PCMH functions.
Authors: Robert S Nocon; Ravi Sharma; Jonathan M Birnberg; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Sang Mee Lee; Marshall H Chin Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julie Day; Debra L Scammon; Jaewhan Kim; Annie Sheets-Mervis; Rachel Day; Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Norman J Waitzman; Michael K Magill Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Robert J Reid; Katie Coleman; Eric A Johnson; Paul A Fishman; Clarissa Hsu; Michael P Soman; Claire E Trescott; Michael Erikson; Eric B Larson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mitesh S Patel; Martin J Arron; Thomas A Sinsky; Eric H Green; David W Baker; Judith L Bowen; Susan Day Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Neil S Fleming; Briget da Graca; Gerald O Ogola; Steven D Culler; Jessica Austin; Patrice McConnell; Russell McCorkle; Phil Aponte; Michael Massey; Cliff Fullerton Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2017 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Douglas H Fernald; Rebecca Mullen; Tristen Hall; Andrew Bienstock; Stephanie Kirchner; Kyle Knierim; Dionisia de la Cerda; Danelle Callan; Robert L Rhyne; L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alison Cuellar; Lorens A Helmchen; Gilbert Gimm; Jay Want; Sriteja Burla; Bradley J Kells; Iwona Kicinger; Len M Nichols Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Grant R Martsolf; Ryan Kandrack; Mark W Friedberg; Brian Briscombe; Peter S Hussey; Christiane LaBonte Journal: Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-30
Authors: Clark A Veet; Thomas R Radomski; Christopher D'Avella; Inmaculada Hernandez; Charles Wessel; Elizabeth C S Swart; William H Shrank; Natasha Parekh Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 5.128