| Literature DB >> 26366731 |
Diana Nicoleta Raba1, Mariana-Atena Poiana1, Aurica Breica Borozan2, Marius Stef3, Florina Radu1, Mirela-Viorica Popa1.
Abstract
The coffee oil has a promising potential to be used in food industry, but an efficient use, especially in products that required high-temperature heating, depends on its chemical composition and the changes induced by processing. Since there is little information on this topic, the aim of our study was to investigate the crude green and roasted coffee oil (GCO, RCO) and heated (HGCO, HRCO) for 1 h at 200°C, by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and in terms of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. The results of FTIR spectroscopy revealed that no statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA, p>0.05) in the oxidative status of GCO and RCO were found. The coffee oils heating induced significant spectral changes in the regions 3100-3600 cm(-1), 2800-3050 cm(-1) and 1680-1780 cm(-1) proved by the differences in the absorbance ratios A 3009 cm(-1)/A 2922 cm(-1), A 3009 cm(-1)/A 2853 cm(-1), A 3009 cm(-1)/A 1744 cm(-1), A 1744 cm(-1)/A 2922 cm(-1). These alterations were related to the reduction of the unsaturation degree due to primary and secondary oxidation processes of the lipid fraction. The radical scavenging ability of oils investigated by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay revealed that the IC50 value of GCO was significantly lower than of RCO (p<0.05). The IC50 values of crude coffee oils were lower than those of heated samples. The antioxidant activity of oils was attributed to both antioxidant compounds with free-radical scavenging capacity and to lipids oxidation products generated by heating. In the first 6 h of incubation, the inhibitory activity of crude oils against E. coli and E. faecalis was not significantly different to the control (p>0.05). Also, HGCO and HRCO showed significantly different inhibitory potential related to the control (p<0.05). The heating induced statistically significant decreases in the effectiveness of coffee oils against the tested bacteria. GCO proved to be the most effective among investigated coffee oils against the tested bacteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26366731 PMCID: PMC4569078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Analytical constants of coffee oil.
| Analitical constants | GCO | HGCO | RCO | HRCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsaponifiables (%) | 8.09±0.39 a | 6.97±0.35 b | 6.34±0.29b | 5.53±0.25c |
| Free fatty acids (%, as oleic acid) | 1.91±0.085a | 3.32±0.15c | 2.64±0.11b | 4.08±0.18d |
| Iodine value (g I2/100 g) | 88.91±2.47a | 80.75±1.73b | 86.24±1.88a | 79.04±1.52b |
| Perodixe value (meq O2/kg) | 3.20±0.15a | 8.17±0.37 c | 5.14±0.22b | 14.81±0.65d |
| Saponification value (mg KOH/g) | 185.86±3.1a | 193.21±4.08b | 179.29±3.63a | 184.32±3.99a |
Values within the same row sharing different superscripts (a-d) are significantly different from each other (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).
Fig 1Comparative ATR-FTIR spectra of coffee oil.
Analytical evaluation of infrared spectra of coffee oil.
| Wavenumbers | Responsible functional groups |
|---|---|
| 3470 cm–1 | Overtone of the glyceride ester carbonyl absorption (C = O) [ |
| 3444 cm–1 | O-H stretching vibration of hydroperoxides [ |
| 3009 cm–1 | C–H stretching symmetric vibration of the |
| (HC = CH) [ | |
| 2922 and 2853 cm–1 | Asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of C–H bonds of |
| aliphatic CH2 group of the fatty acid backbone [ | |
| shoulders at 2956 | Symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration of C–H bonds of |
| and 2871 cm–1 | aliphatic CH3 group [ |
| 1744 cm–1 | Stretching vibration of ester carbonyl functional groups of |
| triglycerides (O-C = O) [ | |
| weak shoulder at | Stretching vibration of free fatty acid carbonyl group (C = O) [ |
| 1711 cm–1 | |
| 1654 cm–1 | C = C stretching vibration |
| 1463 and 1458 cm–1 | Bending vibration of C–H of CH2 and CH3 aliphatic group [ |
| 1418 cm–1 | Rocking vibration of C–H bonds of |
| 1397 cm–1 | Bending in plane vibrations of C-H bonds of |
| [ | |
| 1378 cm–1 | Bending symmetric vibration of C–H bonds of CH2 group [ |
| 1237 and 1160 cm–1 | Stretching and rocking vibration of C–O ester group, CH2 [ |
| 1118 and 1099 cm–1 | Stretching vibration of C–O ester group [ |
| 966 cm−1 | Out-of-plane bending vibration of |
| disubstituted olefins [ | |
| 914 cm–1 | Out-of-plane bending vibration of |
| 722 cm–1 | Overlapping of aliphatic CH2 rocking vibration and the out of plane |
| vibration of |
Fig 2The region of hydrogen’s stretching vibrations of coffee oil infrared spectra.
Fig 3The region of carbonyl stretching vibrations of coffee oil infrared spectra.
The absorbance ratios RI-IV of coffee oil.
| Ratio | GCO | HGCO | RCO | HRCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.1076±0.005a | 0.1051±0.003a | 0.1102±0.004a | 0.1169±0.004b |
|
| 0.1654±0.007a | 0.1495±0.005b | 0.1654±0.006a | 0.1574±0.005a |
|
| 0.1333±0.008a | 0.1051±0.005c | 0.1235±0.007a | 0.1152±0.006b |
|
| 0.8072±0.031a | 1.0000±0.036b | 0.8924±0.037a | 1.0147±0.051b |
Values within the same row sharing different superscripts (a-c) are significantly different from each other (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).
Fig 4DPPH inhibition (%) versus concentration of GCO and HGCO.
Fig 5DPPH inhibition (%) versus concentration of RCO and HRCO.
Fig 6DPPH inhibition (%) versus concentration of BHT.
The IC50 values of BHT and coffee oils.
| Sample | IC50 |
|---|---|
| BHT | 219.67±10.43a μg/ml |
| GCO | 10.25±0.30b mg/ml |
| HGCO | 15.38±0.72d mg/ml |
| RCO | 11.99±0.51c mg/ml |
| HRCO | 12.86±0.79c mg/ml |
IC50 values sharing different superscripts (a-d) are significantly different from each other (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).
Antimicrobial activity of coffee oil and standard antibiotics.
| Microorganisms | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||||
| Cefotaxime | 17±0.62a (I) | – | – | – | – |
| Ampicillin | – | 17±0.70a (I) | – | – | 25±1.05a (S) |
| GCO | 17±0.66a (I) | 16±0.60a (I) | – | – | 13±0.60b (R) |
| HGCO | 16±0.56a (I) | 8.5±0.36b (R) | – | – | 8±0.36d (R) |
| RCO | 8.5±0.30c (R) | 16±0.70a (I) | – | – | 10±0.46c (R) |
| HRCO | 10±0.46b (R) | 10±0.40b (R) | – | – | 8±0.40d (R) |
|
|
| ||||
| Cefotaxime | 0 (R) | – | – | – | – |
| Ampicillin | – | 0 (R) | 25±1.01a (S) | 24±0.90a (S) | 25±1.05a (S) |
| GCO | 0 (R) | 0 (R) | 12±0.50b (R) | 8±0.30b (R) | 10±0.46b (R) |
| HGCO | 0 (R) | 0 (R) | 10±0.40c (R) | 0c (R) | 8±0.36c (R) |
| RCO | 0 (R) | 0 (R) | 0d (R) | 0c (R) | 8±0.30c (R) |
| HRCO | 0 (R) | 0 (R) | 0d (R) | 0c (R) | 8±0.40c (R) |
S: sensitive–exhibited antimicrobial activity (D>16 mm to Ampicillin); I: intermediate antimicrobial activity (D = 14–16 mm to Ampicillin; D = 15–22 mm to Cefotaxime); R: resistant—absent antimicrobial activity (D≤14 mm to Cefotaxime; D≤13 mm to Ampicillin); (–): bacterial culture shows no growth.
Values within the same column sharing different superscripts (a-d) are significantly different from each other (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).