Literature DB >> 26366550

A Longitudinal Assessment of Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Comparing Implant- and Autologous-based Breast Reconstruction.

John P Fischer1, Justin P Fox, Jonas A Nelson, Stephen J Kovach, Joseph M Serletti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy for cancer has increased in recent years, yet long-term, modality-specific comparative data are lacking. We performed this study to compare short- and long-term outcomes after expander, autologous (AT), and direct-to-implant (DI) breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Using four state-level inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult women who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2009. Our primary outcomes were complications within 90 days of surgery, rate of secondary breast surgery within 3 years, and cumulative healthcare charges.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 15,154 women who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander (TE: 70.5%), autologous (AT: 18.1%), or direct to implant (DI: 11.3%) reconstruction. Ninety-day complications were lowest after expander and highest after AT breast reconstruction (TE = 6.5% [reference] vs AT = 13.1% [2.09, 1.82-2.41] vs DI = 6.6% [1.03, 0.84-1.27], P < 0.001). However, adjusted rates of secondary breast procedures were most frequent after expander (2021/1000 discharges) and least frequent after AT (949.0/1000 discharges) reconstruction (P < 0.001). Specifically, unplanned revisions were highest among the tissue expander cohort (TE = 59.2% vs AT = 34.4% vs DI = 45.9%, P < 0.001). The cumulative, adjusted healthcare charges for secondary breast procedures differed slightly across groups (TE = $63,806 vs AT = $66,882 vs DI = $64,145, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications and secondary breast procedures, including unplanned revisions, after breast reconstruction are common and vary by reconstructive modality. The frequency of these secondary procedures adds substantial healthcare charges to the care of the breast reconstruction patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366550     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Sophocles H Voineskos; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Conceptual Considerations for Payment Bundling in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Clifford C Sheckter; Shantanu N Razdan; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The Influence of Physician Payments on the Method of Breast Reconstruction: A National Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Clifford C Sheckter; Hina J Panchal; Shantanu N Razdan; David Rubin; Day Yi; Joseph J Disa; Babak Mehrara; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.

Authors:  R E Pataky; C R Baliski
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Perceived financial decline related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy in a diverse population-based cohort.

Authors:  Nicholas L Berlin; Paul Abrahamse; Adeyiza O Momoh; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Jing Jiang; Ya-ChenTina Shih; Sharon H Giordano; Jinhai Huo; Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Simona F Shaitelman; Thomas A Buchholz; Shervin M Shirvani
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Does the weight of an external breast prosthesis play an important role for women who undergone mastectomy?

Authors:  Katarzyna Hojan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-05-05

8.  Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Isabel Martinez Leal; Vijay Nitturi; Chisom N Iwundu; Valentina Maza; Stacey Reyes; Chiara Acquati; Lorraine R Reitzel
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2021-03-01

9.  Perspectives of Women Who Forgo Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Tanvee Singh; Lakshmi Goparaju; Aviram M Giladi; Oluseyi Aliu; David H Song; Kenneth L Fan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-02-22

10.  A Nationwide Analysis of Cost Variation for Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Yiwen Lu; Adeyiza O Momoh; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.