Benjamin D Smith1, Jing Jiang1, Ya-ChenTina Shih1, Sharon H Giordano1, Jinhai Huo1, Reshma Jagsi1, Adeyiza O Momoh1, Abigail S Caudle1, Kelly K Hunt1, Simona F Shaitelman1, Thomas A Buchholz1, Shervin M Shirvani1. 1. Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (BDS, SFS, TAB, SMS), Department of Surgical Oncology (BDS, ASC, KKH), Department of Health Services Research (JJ, YCTS, SHG, JH), and Department of Breast Medical Oncology (SHG), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (RJ); Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (RJ) and Department of Plastic Survey (AOM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (SMS).
Abstract
Background: Guideline-concordant local therapy options for early breast cancer include lumpectomy plus whole breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, mastectomy alone, mastectomy plus reconstruction, and, in older women, lumpectomy alone. We performed a comparative examination of each treatment's complications and cost to assess their relative values. Methods: Using the MarketScan database of younger women with private insurance and the SEER-Medicare database of older women with public insurance, we identified 105 211 women with early breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We used diagnosis and procedural codes to identify treatment complications within 24 months of diagnosis and compared complications by treatment using two-sided logistic regression. Mean total and complication-related cost, relative to Lump+WBI, were calculated from a payer's perspective and adjusted for differences in covariables using linear regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Lump+WBI was the most commonly used treatment. Mastectomy plus reconstruction was associated with nearly twice the complication risk of Lump+WBI (Marketscan: 54.3% vs 29.6%, relative risk [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82 to 1.91, P < .001; SEER-Medicare: 66.1% vs 37.6%, RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.69 to 1.82, P < .001) and was also associated with higher adjusted total cost (Marketscan: $22 481 greater than Lump+WBI; SEER-Medicare: $1748 greater) and complication-related cost (Marketscan: $9017 greater; SEER-Medicare: $2092 greater). Brachytherapy had modestly higher total cost and complications than WBI. Lumpectomy alone entailed lower cost and complications in the SEER-Medicare cohort only. Conclusions: Mastectomy plus reconstruction results in substantially higher complications and cost than other guideline-concordant treatment options for early breast cancer. These findings are relevant to patients evaluating their local therapy options and to value-based population health management.
Background: Guideline-concordant local therapy options for early breast cancer include lumpectomy plus whole breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, mastectomy alone, mastectomy plus reconstruction, and, in older women, lumpectomy alone. We performed a comparative examination of each treatment's complications and cost to assess their relative values. Methods: Using the MarketScan database of younger women with private insurance and the SEER-Medicare database of older women with public insurance, we identified 105 211 women with early breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We used diagnosis and procedural codes to identify treatment complications within 24 months of diagnosis and compared complications by treatment using two-sided logistic regression. Mean total and complication-related cost, relative to Lump+WBI, were calculated from a payer's perspective and adjusted for differences in covariables using linear regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Lump+WBI was the most commonly used treatment. Mastectomy plus reconstruction was associated with nearly twice the complication risk of Lump+WBI (Marketscan: 54.3% vs 29.6%, relative risk [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82 to 1.91, P < .001; SEER-Medicare: 66.1% vs 37.6%, RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.69 to 1.82, P < .001) and was also associated with higher adjusted total cost (Marketscan: $22 481 greater than Lump+WBI; SEER-Medicare: $1748 greater) and complication-related cost (Marketscan: $9017 greater; SEER-Medicare: $2092 greater). Brachytherapy had modestly higher total cost and complications than WBI. Lumpectomy alone entailed lower cost and complications in the SEER-Medicare cohort only. Conclusions: Mastectomy plus reconstruction results in substantially higher complications and cost than other guideline-concordant treatment options for early breast cancer. These findings are relevant to patients evaluating their local therapy options and to value-based population health management.
Authors: Saskia Litière; Gustavo Werutsky; Ian S Fentiman; Emiel Rutgers; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Erik Van Limbergen; Margreet H A Baaijens; Jan Bogaerts; Harry Bartelink Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Grace L Smith; Ying Xu; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Jing Jiang; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joan L Warren; Martin L Brown; Michael P Fay; Nicola Schussler; Arnold L Potosky; Gerald F Riley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jinhai Huo; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; Simona F Shaitelman; Grace L Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Grace L Smith; Jing Jiang; Thomas A Buchholz; Ying Xu; Karen E Hoffman; Sharon H Giordano; Kelly K Hunt; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joanne S Haviland; J Roger Owen; John A Dewar; Rajiv K Agrawal; Jane Barrett; Peter J Barrett-Lee; H Jane Dobbs; Penelope Hopwood; Pat A Lawton; Brian J Magee; Judith Mills; Sandra Simmons; Mark A Sydenham; Karen Venables; Judith M Bliss; John R Yarnold Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Penny Fang; Weiguo He; Daniel R Gomez; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Reshma Jagsi; Grace L Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mary C Schroeder; Yu-Yu Tien; Lillian M Erdahl; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Brahmendra R Viyyuri; Sonia L Sugg Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Kevin M Klifto; Ala Elhelali; Rachael M Payne; Carisa M Cooney; Michele A Manahan; Gedge D Rosson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-09
Authors: Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Christel Rushing; Whitney Lane; Terry Hyslop; Anaeze C Offodile; Stephanie B Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar; Rachel Greenup; Laura J Fish Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-02-10
Authors: Raquel F D van la Parra; Kaiping Liao; Benjamin D Smith; Wei T Yang; Jessica W T Leung; Sharon H Giordano; Henry M Kuerer Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 16.681