| Literature DB >> 26366293 |
A M Sherif1, M A Ammar1, Y S Mostafa1, S A Gamal Eldin1, A A Osman1.
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate effectiveness of simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking in mild and moderate keratoconus. Methods. Prospective nonrandomized interventional study including 20 eyes of 14 patients with grade 1-2 keratoconus that underwent topography-guided PRK using a Custom Ablation Transition Zone (CATz) profile with 0.02% MMC application immediately followed by standard 3 mw/cm(2) UVA collagen cross-linking. Maximum ablation depth did not exceed 58 μm. Follow-up period: 12 months. Results. Progressive statistically significant improvement of UCVA from 0.83 ± 0.37 logMAR preoperative, reaching 0.25 ± 0.26 logMAR at 12 months (P < 0.001). Preoperative BCVA (0.27 ± 0.31 logMAR) showed a progressive improvement reaching 0.08 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = 0.02). Mean Kmax reduced from 48.9 ± 2.8 to 45.4 ± 3.1 D at 12 months (P < 0.001), mean Kmin reduced from 45.9 ± 2.8 D to 44.1 ± 3.2 D at 12 months (P < 0.003), mean keratometric asymmetry reduced from 3.01 ± 2.03 D to 1.25 ± 1.2 D at 12 months (P < 0.001). The safety index was 1.39 at 12 months and efficacy index 0.97 at 12 months. Conclusion. Combined topography-guided PRK and corneal collagen cross-linking are a safe and effective option in the management of mild and moderate keratoconus. Precis. To our knowledge, this is the first published study on the use of the CATz ablation system on the Nidek Quest excimer laser platform combined with conventional cross-linking in the management of mild keratoconus.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26366293 PMCID: PMC4561114 DOI: 10.1155/2015/321953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 6The ablation profile in CATz (Quest, Nidek excimer laser machine).
Figure 5Comparative topography maps before and after surgery.
Summary of results.
| Parameter | Preoperatively | 1 month postoperatively | 3 months postoperatively | 6 months postoperatively | 12 months postoperatively |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LogMAR UDVA | 0.830 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| LogMAR CDVA | .27 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
|
| 0.99 | 0.108 |
| 0.02 | |
|
| |||||
|
| 48.9 |
45.6 | 45.6 | 45.5 | 45.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| 45.9 | 44.4 | 44.3 | 44.3 | 44.1 |
|
| 0.004 |
| 0.003 | 0.003 | |
|
| |||||
| Median cylindrical error in D | 2.13 | 1.25 |
| 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LogMAR = logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity, CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity, Kmax = maximum keratometry, Kmin = minimum keratometry, and D = diopter.
Pre- and postoperative sphere, cylindrical and spherical equivalent values.
| Sph. | Sph. | Sph. | Sph. | Sph. | Cyl. | Cyl. | Cyl. | Cyl. | Cyl. | SE | SE | SE | SE | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.25 | 1.13 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Case 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.25 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 |
| Case 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.25 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1.25 | 4.13 | 2.25 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.13 |
| Case 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.75 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 0.5 | 0.25 |
| Case 5 | 2.5 | 1.75 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 8.5 | 6.75 | 6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 6.75 | 5.13 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.75 |
| Case 6 | 1.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 2.75 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.25 | 2 | 2.88 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Case 7 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.75 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 2.38 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 0.88 | 0.75 |
| Case 8 | 1.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.13 | 1.38 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Case 9 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.75 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 2.75 | 1.25 | 1.13 | 1.63 | 1.63 |
| Case 10 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 6.5 | 3.25 | 5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 2.38 | 3.25 | 3 | 2.75 |
| Case 11 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.75 | 3.5 | 3 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 2.63 | 2.25 |
| Case 12 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Case 13 | 1.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 2.13 | 1.25 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| Case 14 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.75 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.88 | 1.75 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.25 |
| Case 15 | 1.25 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.25 | 1 | 0.75 | 2 | 1.25 | 1.63 | 1.25 | 1.12 |
| Case 16 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 2 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 1.63 | 1.5 | 1.68 |
| Case 17 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.25 | 2 | 3.5 | 2.75 | 2.5 | 2.38 | 2 |
| Case 18 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 4.75 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1 | 1.25 | 2.63 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.5 | 0.68 |
| Case 19 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.13 | 0.63 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.5 |
| Case 20 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 4.5 | 1.25 | 1 | 1.25 | 1 | 3.5 | 1.63 | 1.5 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
Sph.: sphere, cyl.: cylinder, and SE: spherical equivalent; all are in minus dioptric form.
Figure 1Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity.
Figure 2Preoperative and postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity.
Figure 3Gain/loss of lines of CDVA.
Figure 4Linear regression analysis graph of planned and achieved cylindrical correction.