Literature DB >> 20053064

Averaging facial expression over time.

Jason Haberman1, Tom Harp, David Whitney.   

Abstract

The visual system groups similar features, objects, and motion (e.g., Gestalt grouping). Recent work suggests that the computation underlying perceptual grouping may be one of summary statistical representation. Summary representation occurs for low-level features, such as size, motion, and position, and even for high level stimuli, including faces; for example, observers accurately perceive the average expression in a group of faces (J. Haberman & D. Whitney, 2007, 2009). The purpose of the present experiments was to characterize the time-course of this facial integration mechanism. In a series of three experiments, we measured observers' abilities to recognize the average expression of a temporal sequence of distinct faces. Faces were presented in sets of 4, 12, or 20, at temporal frequencies ranging from 1.6 to 21.3 Hz. The results revealed that observers perceived the average expression in a temporal sequence of different faces as precisely as they perceived a single face presented repeatedly. The facial averaging was independent of temporal frequency or set size, but depended on the total duration of exposed faces, with a time constant of approximately 800 ms. These experiments provide evidence that the visual system is sensitive to the ensemble characteristics of complex objects presented over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20053064      PMCID: PMC2857387          DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  41 in total

1.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why?

Authors:  Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-29

4.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perceptually averaging in a continuous visual world: extracting statistical summary representations over time.

Authors:  Alice R Albrecht; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-03-05

6.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts.

Authors:  Marialuisa Martelli; Najib J Majaj; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  The role of temporal structure in human vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2005-03

8.  The human visual system averages speed information.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk; A Duchon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  37 in total

1.  Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; Anna A Kosovicheva; Allison Yamanashi Leib; Katherine Wood; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Differential neurodynamics and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual pathways during perception of emotional crowds and individuals: a MEG study.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Cody A Cushing; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Central tendency representation and exemplar matching in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Chad Dubé
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Roles of saliency and set size in ensemble averaging.

Authors:  Aleksei U Iakovlev; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Don't make me angry, you wouldn't like me when I'm angry: Volitional choices to act or inhibit are modulated by subliminal perception of emotional faces.

Authors:  Jim Parkinson; Sarah Garfinkel; Hugo Critchley; Zoltan Dienes; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 7.  What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Continuous track paths reveal additive evidence integration in multistep decision making.

Authors:  Cristian Buc Calderon; Myrtille Dewulf; Wim Gevers; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Efficient summary statistical representation when change localization fails.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

10.  Cross-cultural and hemispheric laterality effects on the ensemble coding of emotion in facial crowds.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Sang Chul Chong; Jisoo Sun; Troy G Steiner; Daniel N Albohn; Reginald B Adams; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2017-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.