Literature DB >> 24557109

Technology diffusion of anesthesia information management systems into academic anesthesia departments in the United States.

Ilana S Stol1, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Richard H Epstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) are electronic health records that automatically import vital signs from patient monitors and allow for computer-assisted creation of the anesthesia record. When most recently surveyed in 2007, it was estimated that at least 16% of U.S. academic hospitals (i.e., with an anesthesia residency program) had installed an AIMS. At least an additional 28% reported that they were in the process of implementing, or searching for an AIMS. In this study, we updated the adoption figures as of May 2013 and examined the historical trend of AIMS deployment in U.S. anesthesia residency programs from the perspective of the theory of diffusion of technologic innovations.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent by e-mail to program directors or their identified contact individuals at the 130 U.S. anesthesiology residency programs accredited as of June 30, 2012 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The questionnaires asked whether the department had an AIMS, the year of installation, and, if not present, whether there were plans to install an AIMS within the next 12 months. Follow-up e-mails and phone calls were made until responses were obtained from all programs. Results were collected between February and May 2013. Implementation percentages were determined using the number of accredited anesthesia residency programs at the start of each academic year between 1987 and 2013 and were fit to a logistic regression curve using data through 2012.
RESULTS: Responses were received from all 130 programs. Eighty-seven (67%) reported that they currently are using an AIMS. Ten programs without a current AIMS responded that they would be installing an AIMS within 12 months of the survey. The rate of AIMS adoption by year was well fit by a logistic regression curve (P = 0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: By the end of 2014, approximately 75% of U.S. academic anesthesiology departments will be using an AIMS, with 84% adoption expected between 2018 and 2020. Historical adoption of AIMS has followed Roger's 1962 formulation of the theory of diffusion of innovation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557109     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Using Visual Analytics to Determine the Utilization of Preoperative Anesthesia Assessments.

Authors:  J P Wanderer; C L Gruss; J M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Information needs for the OR and PACU electronic medical record.

Authors:  V Herasevich; M A Ellsworth; J R Hebl; M J Brown; B W Pickering
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems.

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Jonathan M Tan; Arul M Lingappan; Jorge A Gálvez; Sherry E Morgan; Michael A Krall
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Anesthesia Information Management Systems in the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Early Adopters.

Authors:  Jan Bruthans
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk.

Authors:  Monika Zdenka Jering; Khensani N Marolen; Matthew S Shotwell; Jason N Denton; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse Menachem Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Converting data into information and knowledge: The promise and the reality of electronic medical records.

Authors:  Karl A Poterack; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Development of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for C-Section Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).

Authors:  Mostafa Sheykhotayefeh; Reza Safdari; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Seyed Hossein Khademi; Seyedeh Sedigheh Seyed Farajolah; Elham Maserat; Mohamad Jebraeily; Vahid Torabi
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-01-01

9.  Vital Recorder-a free research tool for automatic recording of high-resolution time-synchronised physiological data from multiple anaesthesia devices.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Chul-Woo Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of the Effects of Automated and Manual Record Keeping on Anesthetists' Monitoring Performance: Randomized Controlled Simulation Study.

Authors:  Man-Kei Tse; Simon Y W Li; Tsz Hin Chiu; Chung Wai Lau; Ka Man Lam; Chun Pong Benny Cheng
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2020-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.