PURPOSE: To characterize the epileptogenic zone in neocortical epilepsy (NE) by using magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODS: We defined and compared locations of single and multiple clusters of equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) for interictal spikes with MRI findings, ictal-onset zones (IOZs) from subdural electroencephalography (SDEEG), resected areas, and postsurgical outcomes of 20 patients who underwent cortical resection for medically intractable NE. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had single clusters; six had multiple clusters. Overlap of clusters and IOZs defined group A (nine patients), in which a single cluster coincided with the IOZ; group B1 (four patients), in which a single cluster was within or partially overlapped the IOZ; group B2 (five patients), in which multiple-cluster sections overlapped IOZs; group C (two patients; one single; one multiple), in which no overlap was seen. More single clusters (nine of 14) than multiple clusters (none of six) coincided with the IOZ (p = 0.014). More patients with single clusters (10 of 14) than patients with multiple clusters (one of six) had seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.049). Eight of nine patients in group A, versus three of 11 in groups B1, B2, and C, achieved seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.0098). Correlations between MRI findings and postsurgical outcomes were not statistically significant; eight of 13 patients with single lesions, one of four with no lesions, and two of three with multifocal lesions had seizure-free outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In neocortical epilepsy, MEG ECD clusters correlated with SDEEG IOZs. Single clusters indicated discrete epileptogenic zones that required complete resection for seizure-free outcome. Multiple clusters necessitated that the multiple or extensive epileptogenic zones be completely identified and delineated by SDEEG.
PURPOSE: To characterize the epileptogenic zone in neocortical epilepsy (NE) by using magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODS: We defined and compared locations of single and multiple clusters of equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) for interictal spikes with MRI findings, ictal-onset zones (IOZs) from subdural electroencephalography (SDEEG), resected areas, and postsurgical outcomes of 20 patients who underwent cortical resection for medically intractable NE. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had single clusters; six had multiple clusters. Overlap of clusters and IOZs defined group A (nine patients), in which a single cluster coincided with the IOZ; group B1 (four patients), in which a single cluster was within or partially overlapped the IOZ; group B2 (five patients), in which multiple-cluster sections overlapped IOZs; group C (two patients; one single; one multiple), in which no overlap was seen. More single clusters (nine of 14) than multiple clusters (none of six) coincided with the IOZ (p = 0.014). More patients with single clusters (10 of 14) than patients with multiple clusters (one of six) had seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.049). Eight of nine patients in group A, versus three of 11 in groups B1, B2, and C, achieved seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.0098). Correlations between MRI findings and postsurgical outcomes were not statistically significant; eight of 13 patients with single lesions, one of four with no lesions, and two of three with multifocal lesions had seizure-free outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In neocortical epilepsy, MEG ECD clusters correlated with SDEEGIOZs. Single clusters indicated discrete epileptogenic zones that required complete resection for seizure-free outcome. Multiple clusters necessitated that the multiple or extensive epileptogenic zones be completely identified and delineated by SDEEG.
Authors: E S Schwartz; D J Dlugos; P B Storm; J Dell; R Magee; T P Flynn; D M Zarnow; R A Zimmerman; T P L Roberts Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hideaki Shiraishi; Seppo P Ahlfors; Steven M Stufflebeam; Susanne Knake; Pål G Larsson; Matti S Hämäläinen; Kyoko Takano; Maki Okajima; Keisaku Hatanaka; Shinji Saitoh; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Hiroatsu Murakami; Zhong I Wang; Ahmad Marashly; Balu Krishnan; Richard A Prayson; Yosuke Kakisaka; John C Mosher; Juan Bulacio; Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez; William E Bingaman; Imad M Najm; Richard C Burgess; Andreas V Alexopoulos Journal: Brain Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Christos Papadelis; Eleonora Tamilia; Michel AlHilani; Joseph R Madsen; Phillip L Pearl; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Erin C Conrad; Samuel B Tomlinson; Jeremy N Wong; Kelly F Oechsel; Russell T Shinohara; Brian Litt; Kathryn A Davis; Eric D Marsh Journal: Brain Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Robert C Knowlton; Shantanu N Razdan; Nita Limdi; Rotem A Elgavish; Jeff Killen; Jeffrey Blount; Jorge G Burneo; Lawrence Ver Hoef; Lebron Paige; Edward Faught; Pongkiat Kankirawatana; Al Bartolucci; Kristen Riley; Ruben Kuzniecky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 10.422