Literature DB >> 2635484

The control and speed of shifts of attention.

B J Kröse1, B Julesz.   

Abstract

We measured the detectability of a target pattern in a display consisting of 12 elements in a circle around the central fixation point. The display was presented briefly and followed after a variable amount of time by a mask. We found that presenting a pre-cue, designating the target position, facilitated target detectability. Attention is directed to the cued location. When the observer has to detect a (second) target among the non cued elements, performance for locations close to the cue is not significantly different from performance for locations further away. This suggests that there is no "scan-path" or proximity effect. We also found that the identification of the cued element delayed the detectability of the subsequent target by more than 160 msec. In another series of experiments we studied the control of attentional shifts. We found that, for short mask delays (100, 160, and 260 msec) the observer is unable to selectively process elements which are not physically cued but only verbally defined by their position relative to the cue. When we increase the positional uncertainty of the target by increasing the number of physical cues, performance drops until it reaches an asymptote with 5 elements. We infer that, even though the target is very similar to the background, a parallel mechanism, used for the extraction of stimulus features, designates prospective target locations which may be subsequently checked by a (slow) attentional process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2635484     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90142-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects.

Authors:  C Haimson; M Behrmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C P Talgar; E L Cameron
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2001

3.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.

Authors:  H W Kwak; D Dagenbach; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

4.  The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field.

Authors:  J Saarinen; B Julesz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

6.  Vision outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  J Braun; D Sagi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

7.  The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-07

8.  Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.

Authors:  V Maljkovic; K Nakayama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

10.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.