Literature DB >> 23719803

A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.

Michael Wong1, Ryan M Peters, Daniel Goldreich.   

Abstract

In touch as in vision, perceptual acuity improves with training to an extent that differs greatly across people; even individuals with similar initial acuity may undergo markedly different improvement with training. What accounts for this variability in perceptual learning? We hypothesized that a simple physical characteristic, fingertip surface area, might constrain tactile learning, because previous research suggests that larger fingers have more widely spaced mechanoreceptors. To test our hypothesis, we trained 10 human participants intensively on a tactile spatial acuity task. During 4 d, participants completed 1900 training trials (38 50-trial blocks) in which they discriminated the orientation of square-wave gratings pressed onto the stationary index or ring finger, with auditory feedback provided to signal correct and incorrect responses. We progressively increased task difficulty by shifting to thinner groove widths whenever participants achieved ≥90% correct block performance. We took optical scans to measure surface area from the distal interphalangeal crease to the tip of the finger. Participants' acuity improved markedly on the trained finger and to a lesser extent on the untrained finger. Crucially, we found that participants' tactile spatial acuity improved toward a theoretical optimum set by their finger size; participants with worse initial performance relative to their finger size improved more with training, and posttraining performance was better correlated than pretraining performance with finger size. These results strongly support the hypothesis that tactile perceptual learning is limited by finger size. We suspect that analogous physical constraints on perceptual learning will be found in other sensory modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719803      PMCID: PMC6618562          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  18 in total

1.  The somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold changes after a placebo procedure.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Mehran Emadi Andani; Serena Recchia; Michele Tinazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feeling better: separate pathways for targeted enhancement of spatial and temporal touch.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Pablo Celnik; Steven S Hsiao; John E Desmond
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-03

3.  Tactile orientation perception: an ideal observer analysis of human psychophysical performance in relation to macaque area 3b receptive fields.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Phillip Staibano; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  No evidence for sex differences in tactile distance anisotropy.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Expansion and contraction of resource allocation in sensory bottlenecks.

Authors:  Laura R Edmondson; Alejandro Jiménez Rodríguez; Hannes P Saal
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Functional consequences of experience-dependent plasticity on tactile perception following perceptual learning.

Authors:  Natalie K Trzcinski; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Individual Performance in Compliance Discrimination is Constrained by Skin Mechanics but Improved under Active Control.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Yuxiang Wang; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  World Haptics Conf       Date:  2021-08-23

8.  Enhanced tactile acuity through mental states.

Authors:  Sebastian T Philipp; Tobias Kalisch; Thomas Wachtler; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differences in two-point discrimination and sensory threshold in the blind between braille and text reading: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ji-Woong Noh; Byoung-Sun Park; Mee-Young Kim; Lim-Kyu Lee; Seung-Min Yang; Won-Deok Lee; Yong-Sub Shin; Ji-Hye Kang; Ju-Hyun Kim; Jeong-Uk Lee; Taek-Yong Kwak; Tae-Hyun Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Junghwan Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Oliver Mao; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.