| Literature DB >> 36177189 |
Jiarong Xu1, Hui Shi1,2, Jun Luo1,2, Haiyan Yao1,3, Pei Wang1,2,3, Zhihua Li1,2,3, Junchao Wei1,2,3.
Abstract
Dental caries, a chronic and irreversible disease caused by caries-causing bacteria, has been listed as one of the three major human diseases to be prevented and treated. Therefore, it is critical to effectively stop the development of enamel caries. Remineralization treatment can control the progression of caries by inhibiting and reversing enamel demineralization at an early stage. In this process, functional materials guide the deposition of minerals on the damaged enamel, and the structure and hardness of the enamel are then restored. These remineralization materials have great potential for clinical application. In this review, advanced materials for enamel remineralization were briefly summarized, furthermore, an outlook on the perspective of remineralization materials were addressed.Entities:
Keywords: advanced materials; demineralization; enamel caries; hydroxyapatite; remineralization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36177189 PMCID: PMC9513249 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.985881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of advanced materials promoting remineralization and repairing enamel.
FIGURE 2AFM height and deflection images of NPF solution in the presence of (A) 1 ppm F and (B) 1 ppm F and 1 μM AMTN for 300 min. (C) Schematic representation of nanorod tissue assembly in the presence of F ions and AMTN. Reprinted with permission from [ (Yu et al., 2019) ]. Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 3(A) The schematic diagram of the synthetic multilayer FAP/polymer nanocomposite controlled by Mg2+. (B)—(C) Cross-sectional SEM images of (FPN-M)2 with corresponding details. (D) Granular interlaminar base layer (indicated by red arrows). (E) Interlayer structure and amorphous-reinforced architecture schematic diagram. Reprinted with permission from [ (Li Y. et al., 2021) ]. Copyright© 2021 American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 4Five successive stages of enamel crystal precipitation and extension. (A) Stage of calcium phosphate particles precipitating and adhering to the organized enamel protein matrix, (B) Formation of initial crystal needle through single nucleation sites, (C) Extension of enamel crystals by lattice-guided alignment of individual apatite crystals, (D) Stage of crystal further extension and growing, (E) Enamel prisms (rods) are formed by the cross arrangement of single enamel crystals. Reprinted with permission from [ (Jokisaari et al., 2019) ]. Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 5Diagram of amelogenin C-terminal peptides self-assembly to guide the extension of OCP crystallization. (A) The monomeric structure of amelogenin’s C-terminal peptide. The red curve represents the -COOH terminus. (B) Hydrophobic interactions lead to the formation of oligomeric amelogenin’s C-terminal peptides. (C) Nanorod structures as building blocks are formed by the association of oligomers. (D) Elongated organic-inorganic complex aggregates formed by the building blocks nanorods and CaP nanoclusters. Reprinted with permission from [ (Wu et al., 2017) ]. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
Synthetic peptides for biomineralization.
| Peptide | Sequence | Remineralization effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chimeric peptide | SVSVGMKPSPRP-GGGGS- LEAWPATDKTKREEVD | Hardness 0.70 ± 0.21 GPa, elastic modulus 66.7 ± 2.4 GPa |
|
| TDP | DRNLGDSLHRQEI | %SMHR of TDP increased; a significantly thicker and brighter remineralization layer with shallower lesions obtained |
|
| P32 | MPLPSYEVLTPLKWPSTDKTKREEVD | 1.8-fold increase in elastic modulus and a 1.9-fold increase in hardness compared to demineralized enamel |
|
| QP5 | QPYQPVQPHQPMQPQTKREEVD | %SMHR: 50.06, similar to NaF (58.48) |
|
| ADP5 | SYENSHSQAINVDRT (AA sequence) | Vicker’s microhardness: 141 + 8 HV10; hardness: 2.23 + 0.23 GPa; elastic modulus: 58.6 + 4.7 GPa |
|
| Peptide-7 | Asp-Asp-Asp-Glu-Glu-Lys-Cys | Ra and Rz: 19.0 ± 4.3 nm and 223.6 ± 23.6 nm; the hardness 497.79 ± 19.63; %SMHR: 84.13; adhesion force 63.80 ± 4.58 N |
|
| Sp-H5 | phosphoserine-DSHAKRHHGYKRKFHEKHHSHRGY | 2.5- |
|
| P-113-DPS | AKRHHGYKRKFH-SpSp | The thickness of the regenerated crystal layer in 24 h: 8.5 |
|
| LCPS-CP | 37SYSGYS42 | Elastic modulus of 65.43 ± 15.57 GPa and surface hardness of 1.831 ± 0.5852 GPa for the LCPS-CP group |
|
| 8DSS | (Asp-Ser-Ser)8 | lesions became shallower after pH cycling; shows remineralization results similar to 1 g/L NaF |
|
Abbreviations: %SMHR, surface microhardness recovery ratio; ADP5, amelogenin derived peptide 5; LCPS-CP: LCPS-CP, low-complexity protein segments containing phosphonate group.
FIGURE 6(A) Schematic diagram of anti-S. mutans biofilm on the enamel surface and fluorescence images (×20) of S. mutans biofilm in various concentrations of P-113-DPS and Sp-H5 solutions. (B) Remineralization experiment schematic. (C) 8.5 μm needle-like remineralized layers formed by P-113- remineralized layers and (D) its FE-SEM micrographs (×5000, ×50,000, and ×200,000). Reprinted with permission from [ (Zhou et al., 2021) ]. Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society.
Antibacterial remineralization dual materials.
| Materials | Antibacterial mechanism | Bacterial used | Antibacterial adhesion results | Antibacterial test results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASP-PEG | The PEG film on the enamel surface is resistant to bacterial adhesion |
| Almost no bacterial attachment is detected on the surface | NA |
|
| ZHA@ALN-PAA | The released Zn2+ are antibacterial |
| NA | IR: 75.05% |
|
| Sp-H5 | The cationic amino acid residues in H5 bind to cell wall, enhance membrane permeability and interact with intracellular DNA of |
| Viability counts at 16× MIC [6.11E+05 (CFU/ml)] | MIC: 2 μmol/ml |
|
| MBC: 4 μmol/ml | |||||
| P-113-DPS | P-113-DPS crosslink with bacterial membrane phospholipids, increasing membrane permeability and forming perforation, preferentially occupy the binding site to inhibit the adhesion of |
| Viable counts of | MIC:8 μM ml−1 |
|
| MBC:16 μM ml−1 | |||||
| LCPS-CP | Hydrophilic LCPSs eliminate adsorbed biomolecules by forming an anti-sewage ensemble; negatively charged phosphate coatings cause electrostatic repulsion between the bacterial film and the enamel, ultimately reducing adhesion |
| relative biomass value of the no peptide and LCPS-OH are more than eightfold greater of LCPS-OP and LCPS-CP | NA |
|
| CMC/ACP | CMC neutralizes the negative charge on the surface of bacteria through a large number of positive charges to reduce the early adhesion of bacteria |
| adherence of | Biofilm formation decreased by 45.3% ( |
|
| CS-QP5 | CS captures free hydrogen ions, slows pH fall, damages the bacterial cell wall, and causes bacterial death |
| inhibited adhesion up to 95.43% | MIC/MBC: 5 mg/ml −1 |
|
| PAMAM-NH2 | PAMAM-NH2 destroy the bacterial wall by contacting bacteria for sterilization, improve the smoothness of remineralized layer and reduce bacterial adhesion |
| Bacterial adhesion forces 3.64 ± 1.52 nN (control group: 5.52 ± 1.6 nN) | Colony-forming unit counting 5.78 ± 0.27 (control group: 6.13 ± 0.2) |
|
Abbreviations: NA, not available; PASP-PEG, poly (aspartic acid)-polyethylene glycol; ZHA@ALN-PAA, zinc-substituted hydroxyapatite/alendronate-grafted polyacrylic acid; IR, inhibition ratio; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; LCPS-CP, low-complexity protein segments containing phosphonate group; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration.
FIGURE 7(A) In vitro peptide-induced bionic remineralization process. a) Organic matter stabilized calcium and phosphorus solution provides sufficient amount of ions b) Self-assembly of peptides into nanospheres, nano-chain structures orderly guide the deposition of calcium and phosphorus ions and extension of ordered orientation c) Organic matter modifies the substrate surface to form nucleation sites. (B) Mechanism of action of antibacterial anti-caries materials. d) Enamel surface coating reduces microbial adhesion; e) Positively charged peptides direct killing of caries-causing bacteria.
Summary of chitosan basing remineralization systems.
| Materials | Approach | Remineralization effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS-AMEL | 15 min CS-AMEL 2 times per day; 8 h modified remineralization solution, 16 h remineralization solution | The depth of caries decreased from ∼100 to ∼30 μm |
|
| CMC-ALN/ACP + GLY | 10 min CMC-ALN/ACP + Gly, remineralization solution per day for 7 d | %SMHR: 49.4; Modulus recovered by 68.6% |
|
| MMP-20–CS-AMEL | MMP-20–CS-AMEL hydrogel 15 min; AS with 1 ppm at 37°C, 5 d | Obtained a 2.4-fold increase in hardness and 2.6-fold increase in modulus |
|
| CS-QP5 | 2.5 mg/ml CS-QP5 for 5 min, 4 times daily; remineralization and demineralization solution alternated for 12 d at 37°C, low-speed magnetic stirring (100 rpm) | %SMHR: 50.6; Modulus recovered by 68.6% |
|
| CMC/LYZ-ACP | CMC/LYZ-ACP nanogels 10 min; 0.15 M 30 s; Tris−HCl buffer at pH 8 for 30 min | The hardness is 3.8 ± 0.3 Gpa, Modulus 80.3 ± 5 GP; compared to the nature enamel group hardness of 4.3 ± 0.5 Gpa; modulus 89.5 ± 5.1 Gpa |
|
| CS-A hydrogels | 1 M CaCl2 15 min, CS-A hydrogel 2 h, AS at 37°C, 7 d | A layer of 7.5–8.5 µm thick for 7d; the hardness 2.26 Gpa, and %SMHR reached 77.4 |
|
Abbreviations: %SMHR, surface microhardness recovery ratio; CS-AMEL, chitosan-amelogenin; CMC-ALN/ACP + Gly, carboxymethyl chitosan-alendronate/amorphous calcium phosphate; MMP-20–CS-AMEL, matrix metalloproteinase-20- chitosan-amelogenin; CMC/LYZ-ACP, carboxymethyl chitosan/lysozyme-amorphous calcium phosphate; CS-A hydrogels, chitosan (CS) and agarose (A) hydrogels.