| Literature DB >> 26351513 |
Marija Kindl1, Biljana Blažeković1, Franz Bucar2, Sanda Vladimir-Knežević1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activities of the ethanolic extracts of six selected Thymus species growing in Croatia (T. longicaulis, T. praecox subsp. polytrichus, T. pulegioides, T. serpyllum subsp. serpyllum, T. striatus, and T. vulgaris). Antioxidant effectiveness was assessed using six different assays, in comparison with rosmarinic acid, luteolin, and reference antioxidants. All tested Thymus extracts possessed DPPH (IC50 = 3-6 μg/mL) and nitric oxide (IC50 = 70-177 μg/mL) free radical scavenging activities, strong reducing properties (IC50 = 11-15 μg/mL), ferrous ion chelating activity (IC50 = 126-389 μg/mL), ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation (IC50 = 34-80 μg/mL), and high total antioxidant capacities (238-294 mg AAE/g). AChE inhibitory activity was examined using Ellman's colorimetric method and all tested extracts showed anti-AChE activity in a dose dependent manner. The values of 10-28%, 23-39%, and 64-86% were obtained for tested concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL, respectively. Additionally, the contents of total hydroxycinnamic derivatives, flavonoids, and tannins in dried plant samples were determined spectrophotometrically. Our results highlighted Thymus species as a rich source of natural antioxidants and AChE inhibitors that could be useful in preventing and treating Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26351513 PMCID: PMC4553186 DOI: 10.1155/2015/403950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Yield percentages of the ethanolic extracts and contents of total hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids, tannins, and procyanidins in aerial parts of selected Thymus species.
| Plant species | Extract yield | Content (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxycinnamic acids | Flavonoids | Tannins | Procyanidins | ||
|
| 21.34 | 5.41 ± 0.09a | 0.40 ± 0.004a | 1.33 ± 0.02a | 0.70 ± 0.015a |
|
| 20.06 | 4.39 ± 0.01b | 0.24 ± 0.010b | 0.93 ± 0.05b | 0.29 ± 0.002b |
|
| 22.54 | 6.17 ± 0.07c | 0.42 ± 0.003c | 1.59 ± 0.04c | 0.41 ± 0.002c |
|
| 19.22 | 4.36 ± 0.11b | 0.40 ± 0.006a | 1.06 ± 0.08d | 0.45 ± 0.004d |
|
| 15.54 | 3.35 ± 0.10d | 0.15 ± 0.003d | 0.77 ± 0.07e | 0.26 ± 0.003e |
|
| 18.28 | 3.58 ± 0.03e | 0.24 ± 0.006b | 0.98 ± 0.03b,d | 0.21 ± 0.002f |
Extract yield expressed as percentage weight of air-dried plant material.
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
DPPH radical scavenging effects of Thymus ethanolic extracts, polyphenolic compounds, and reference antioxidant.
| Samples | DPPH∙ scavenging activity (%) ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | |
|
| 12.82 ± 3.02a | 17.74 ± 1.51a | 27.78 ± 0.60a | 51.71 ± 0.03a | 84.62 ± 3.02a | 87.18 ± 0.09a | 87.82 ± 1.51a |
|
| 10.84 ± 2.73a,b | 13.52 ± 2.12b | 27.68 ± 2.12a | 47.00 ± 2.73b | 83.69 ± 0.61a | 86.70 ± 0.58a | 86.70 ± 0.61a,b |
|
| 8.61 ± 1.87a,c | 12.25 ± 0.05b | 20.20 ± 0.94b | 38.58 ± 0.23c | 73.18 ± 0.94b | 83.94 ± 0.23a,b | 87.25 ± 1.64a |
|
| 2.05 ± 0.48d | 8.39 ± 2.18c | 11.13 ± 0.24c | 22.95 ± 4.36d | 52.23 ± 4.12c | 82.02 ± 1.70b,c | 84.42 ± 0.73b |
|
| 7.05 ± 1.25b,c,d | 9.91 ± 0.93b,c | 19.82 ± 1.87b | 40.53 ± 0.62c | 75.11 ± 0.31b | 86.34 ± 2.49a | 87.67 ± 0.03a |
|
| 4.75 ± 0.65c,d | 6.58 ± 1.42c | 14.90 ± 1.01d | 29.56 ± 0.26e | 55.27 ± 0.69c | 79.73 ± 0.27c | 80.95 ± 0.13c |
| Rosmarinic acid | 37.45 ± 2.07e | 56.49 ± 1.78d | 89.12 ± 0.02e | 93.10 ± 0.30f | 94.98 ± 0.02d | 94.98 ± 0.09d | 95.19 ± 0.30d |
| Luteolin | 25.00 ± 1.61f | 50.19 ± 1.87e | 82.01 ± 0.80f | 84.47 ± 1.07g | 84.85 ± 0.14a | 85.80 ± 1.87a | 87.12 ± 1.61a |
| Trolox | 18.98 ± 2.82g | 24.44 ± 0.13f | 47.19 ± 2.64g | 87.22 ± 0.60g | 93.98 ± 0.03d | 95.68 ± 0.29d | 96.62 ± 0.02d |
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
Comparative overview of IC50 values as well as total antioxidant capacities of Thymus ethanolic extracts, polyphenolic compounds, and reference antioxidants.
| Samples | IC50 ( |
Total antioxidant
capacity
(mg AAE/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | NO radical scavenging activity | Reducing power | Iron chelating activity | Inhibition of lipid peroxidation | ||
|
| 3.01 ± 0.02a | 71.57 ± 4.85a | 11.84 ± 0.11a | 271.85 ± 7.94a | 34.30 ± 7.37a | 293.82 ± 11.64a,b |
|
| 3.41 ± 0.16b | 139.04 ± 5.69b | 15.10 ± 0.64b | 388.77 ± 3.28b | 78.74 ± 7.08b | 287.72 ± 12.52b,c |
|
| 4.18 ± 0.02c | 69.77 ± 4.38a | 11.39 ± 0.07a | 277.10 ± 1.03a | 34.83 ± 7.36a | 251.26 ± 0.75d,e |
|
| 6.01 ± 0.44d | 176.59 ± 8.09c | 14.55 ± 0.57b | 342.04 ± 6.89c | 80.00 ± 9.93b | 238.16 ± 2.50d |
|
| 4.06 ± 0.04c | 91.09 ± 5.34d | 14.68 ± 0.38b | 333.14 ± 4.39c | 63.01 ± 7.44b | 276.04 ± 3.38c |
|
| 5.60 ± 0.07e | 97.93 ± 2.93d | 14.41 ± 0.19b | 125.91 ± 2.50d | 69.60 ± 5.14b | 257.87 ± 5.76e |
| Rosmarinic acid | 0.66 ± 0.03f | 15.67 ± 0.44e | 2.67 ± 0.10c | na | 21.07 ± 1.63a | 598.34 ± 8.26f |
| Luteolin | 0.73 ± 0.11f | 18.31 ± 1.02e | 4.51 ± 0.07d | na | 2.03 ± 0.23c | 67.72 ± 3.00g |
| Trolox | 1.67 ± 0.09g | 53.91 ± 0.13f | 6.64 ± 0.36e | na | — | 307.89 ± 2.00a |
| EDTA | — | — | — | 5.34 ± 0.10e | — | — |
Results are calculated for sample concentration of 100 μg/mL.
—: not tested; na: no activity. Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
NO radical scavenging effects of Thymus ethanolic extracts, polyphenolic compounds, and reference antioxidant.
| Samples | NO∙ scavenging activity (%) ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | |
|
| 7.29 ± 1.05a | 15.47 ± 1.28a | 29.62 ± 2.75a | 44.17 ± 1.47a | 57.64 ± 1.10a | 72.25 ± 0.11a | 75.01 ± 0.95a |
|
| na | 0.23 ± 0.03b | 10.16 ± 0.46b | 26.03 ± 1.52b | 43.02 ± 1.72b | 60.77 ± 0.13b | 68.22 ± 0.03b |
|
| 0.37 ± 0.05b | 11.64 ± 0.90c | 29.40 ± 1.10a | 44.58 ± 2.19a,g | 58.01 ± 0.37a | 70.40 ± 0.46a | 70.89 ± 1.54c |
|
| na | na | 2.73 ± 1.46c | 16.38 ± 1.20c | 37.08 ± 1.66c | 53.92 ± 1.26c | 62.38 ± 0.80d |
|
| 7.73 ± 0.78a,c | 21.19 ± 0.98d | 28.73 ± 2.16a | 39.76 ± 2.04d | 52.17 ± 1.17d | 63.24 ± 2.19b | 66.12 ± 1.26e |
|
| 2.16 ± 0.82b | 14.96 ± 1.23a,c | 24.42 ± 0.35d | 39.02 ± 0.72d | 50.52 ± 0.74d | 60.96 ± 1.17b | 63.73 ± 0.55d |
| Rosmarinic acid | 10.86 ± 3.09c | 47.20 ± 0.23e | 58.40 ± 2.23e | 68.19 ± 0.27e | 73.75 ± 0.33e | 76.23 ± 0.76d | 77.22 ± 0.21f |
| Luteolin | 1.57 ± 0.21b | 43.10 ± 3.95f | 57.64 ± 2.75e | 64.34 ± 0.62f | 70.95 ± 1.92f | 76.25 ± 1.06d | 80.31 ± 0.30g |
| Trolox | na | 5.87 ± 1.20g | 20.06 ± 0.02f | 47.39 ± 0.14g | 80.70 ± 0.54g | 83.62 ± 0.62e | 84.86 ± 1.23h |
na: no activity. Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
Ferric reducing power of Thymus ethanolic extracts, polyphenolic compounds, and reference antioxidant.
| Samples | Absorbance at 700 nm ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 50 | |
|
| 0.065 ± 0.001a,b | 0.105 ± 0.001a,b | 0.172 ± 0.003a,b | 0.301 ± 0.001a | 0.534 ± 0.008a | 0.946 ± 0.011a | 1.619 ± 0.008a |
|
| 0.060 ± 0.004a,c | 0.090 ± 0.004a,c | 0.147 ± 0.015a | 0.242 ± 0.019b | 0.432 ± 0.018b | 0.782 ± 0.019b | 1.340 ± 0.014b |
|
| 0.070 ± 0.001b | 0.109 ± 0.001b | 0.179 ± 0.002b | 0.319 ± 0.005c | 0.547 ± 0.004a | 0.961 ± 0.023a | 1.541 ± 0.029c |
|
| 0.060 ± 0.006a,c | 0.090 ± 0.007a,c | 0.147 ± 0.015a | 0.254 ± 0.019b | 0.442 ± 0.023b | 0.809 ± 0.008b | 1.359 ± 0.064b |
|
| 0.055 ± 0.001c | 0.085 ± 0.004c | 0.143 ± 0.006a | 0.249 ± 0.006d | 0.447 ± 0.010b | 0.795 ± 0.017b | 1.439 ± 0.017d |
|
| 0.062 ± 0.001a,b,c | 0.094 ± 0.003a,b,c | 0.149 ± 0.005a,b | 0.254 ± 0.001b | 0.464 ± 0.014b | 0.797 ± 0.001b | 1.376 ± 0.005b,d |
| Rosmarinic acid | 0.173 ± 0.005d | 0.321 ± 0.013d | 0.581 ± 0.015c | 1.055 ± 0.028e | 1.777 ± 0.065c | 3.251 ± 0.086c | 3.584 ± 0.010e |
| Luteolin | 0.142 ± 0.006e | 0.228 ± 0.008e | 0.390 ± 0.012d | 0.641 ± 0.037f | 1.132 ± 0.026d | 1.782 ± 0.045d | 3.568 ± 0.038e |
| Trolox | 0.089 ± 0.002f | 0.148 ± 0.007f | 0.240 ± 0.016e | 0.432 ± 0.018g | 0.903 ± 0.025e | 1.496 ± 0.021e | 2.941 ± 0.001f |
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
Ferrous ion chelating capacities of Thymus ethanolic extracts.
| Samples | Iron(II) chelating ability ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.5 | 75 | 150 | 300 | 600 | |
|
| na | 1.92 ± 0.03a | 15.13 ± 2.71a | 58.05 ± 2.17a | 77.30 ± 0.68a,c |
|
| na | na | 1.30 ± 0.95b | 39.19 ± 0.48b | 75.72 ± 0.25a,b |
|
| na | na | 9.32 ± 3.06a,c | 57.34 ± 0.93a | 77.40 ± 1.07a,c |
|
| na | na | 2.47 ± 0.44b | 46.04 ± 0.44c | 74.41 ± 1.89b |
|
| na | na | 3.07 ± 4.34b,c | 46.44 ± 0.42c | 78.61 ± 0.84c |
|
| 6.85 ± 3.07 | 19.61 ± 1.52b | 64.38 ± 1.47d | 92.71 ± 1.38e | 95.70 ± 0.03d |
na: no activity. Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by Thymus ethanolic extracts.
| Samples | Inhibition of lipid peroxidation (%) ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 100 | 500 | 1000 | |
|
| 40.20 ± 3.38a | 76.26 ± 1.80a | 89.75 ± 1.34a | 97.84 ± 1.24a |
|
| 32.78 ± 1.89b | 55.73 ± 5.12b | 82.56 ± 6.46a | 88.03 ± 3.82b |
|
| 40.03 ± 3.37a | 75.94 ± 1.79a | 89.38 ± 1.33a | 97.43 ± 1.23a |
|
| 32.91 ± 1.90b | 55.45 ± 5.87b | 82.40 ± 7.19a | 88.40 ± 3.84b |
|
| 31.89 ± 0.08b | 63.68 ± 8.11a,b | 91.29 ± 4.56a | 98.56 ± 1.59a |
|
| 31.76 ± 0.08b | 59.42 ± 2.42b | 90.92 ± 4.54a | 98.15 ± 1.58a |
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Total antioxidant capacities of Thymus ethanolic extracts, polyphenolic compounds, and reference antioxidant.
Figure 2Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activities of Thymus ethanolic extracts, rosmarinic acid, and galantamine as reference drug.