| Literature DB >> 30918453 |
Lucky Legbosi Nwidu1, Ekramy Elmorsy2, Wayne Grant Carter3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyherbal standardised extracts used in ethnomedicine of Eastern Nigeria for memory improvements were evaluated for anti-cholinesterases and anti-oxidant properties.Entities:
Keywords: anti-cholinesterases; anti-oxidants; memory improvement; phenolics; polyherbal
Year: 2018 PMID: 30918453 PMCID: PMC6422584 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.2.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays J Med Sci ISSN: 1394-195X
Name of standardised herbal products, components and yield of methanolic extract
| S/No. | Name of Herbal Product | Constituents/ Common name | Family | Composition | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Neocare herbal tea (NHT) | Euphorbiaceae | 25% | 4.22 | |
| Meliaceae | 25% | ||||
| Dennstaedtiaceae | 50% | ||||
| 2. | Herbalin complex (HCT) | Hippocrataeceae | 50% | 5.52 | |
| Santalaceae | 25% | ||||
| Lamiaceae | 25% | ||||
| 3. | Phytoblis Herbal Tea (PHT) | Urticaceae | 25% | 5.24 | |
| Hippocretaeceae | 50% | ||||
| Lamiaceae | 25% | ||||
| Aloe vera | Asphodelaceae | 25% |
Figure 1Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
AChE inhibitory and DPPH radical scavenging activities of polyherbal extracts
| S/No. | Polyherbal Methanolic Extracts / pure drugs | Inhibitory concentration (IC50) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anticholinesterases activity | Antioxidant activity | ||
| 1. | NHT | 324.0 ± 3.9 | 0.01 ± 0.023 |
| 2. | HCT | 0.20 ± 0.7 | 0.08 ± 0.0032 |
| 3. | PHT | 0.70 ± 2.9 | 0.30 ± 0.0020 |
| 4. | Eserine | 0.90 ± 0.03 | - |
| 5. | α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) | - | 20.0 ± 0.002 |
All values are reported as means ± SD (n = 3). Polyherbal extract inhibition of AChE was measured using a modified Ellman assay, with percentage inhibition of AChE calculated relative to eserine; polyherbal anti-oxidant activity was assessed via the percentage inhibition (radical scavenging) of DPPH with vitamin E used as a positive control.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
Figure 3Reducing capacity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
Figure 4Total phenolic content (A), and total flavonoid content (B) of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean ± SD, n = 3
Effect of standardised polyherbal methanolic extracts on HepG2 cells viability
| S/No. | Polyherbal Extracts | 1 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | 1000 μg/ mL | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | NHT | 111.3±3.5 | 107.5±9.2 | 70.1±6.3 | 43.2±5.22 | ~745 |
| 2. | HCT | 105±5 | 103.5±7.25 | 91.6±6.4 | 65.65±9.34 | ~1400 |
| 3. | PHT | 104.7±7.5 | 102.4±3.4 | 95.4±6.36 | 71.2±5.3 | >1650 |
HepG2 cells were incubated with polyherbal extracts at the specified concentration for 48 h and the percentage of viable cells evaluated using a MTT assay. Polyherbal extracts were assessed at least in triplicate across a 1 μg/mL–1000 μg/mL concentration range, and an approximate IC50 calculated.
All values are reported as means (±SD) (n = 3)
P = 0.043,
P = 0.006,
P = 0.0001.