Literature DB >> 24951217

Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training.

Amy Melsaether1, Meredith McDermott, Dipti Gupta, Kristine Pysarenko, Sara D Shaylor, Linda Moy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BPE assessments and no data as to whether training improves agreement. Therefore, for this study, we sought to assess interreader agreement for BPE at baseline and after dedicated training.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 119 breast MRI examinations performed in 119 patients (mean age, 47 years; age range, 25-79 years) in 2008. One week before training, four fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2-12 years' experience independently recorded BPE on a 4-point scale as follows: 1 (minimal, ≤ 25%), 2 (mild, 26-50%), 3 (moderate, 51-75%), or 4 (marked, > 75%). The same 119 cases were reread in a new random order within 1 week and at least 3 weeks after training. Interreader agreement and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa coefficients.
RESULTS: With training, interreader agreement increased from fair (κ = 0.36) to moderate (κ = 0.48). Improvement was sustained at 3 weeks after training (κ = 0.45). Intrareader agreement between time points 2 and 3 (κ: mean, 0.79; range, 0.56-0.98) was greater than between time points 1 and 2 (κ: mean, 0.62; range, 0.45-0.84), indicating readers learned and retained.
CONCLUSION: Initial interreader agreement for BPE was fair among breast radiologists but achieved sustained improvement with training, highlighting the importance of education and inclusion of standardized BPE categories in a reference atlas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  background parenchymal enhancement; breast MRI; interreader agreement; intrareader agreement; training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951217     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI. A feasibility study with a semi-automatic and automatic software compared to observer-based scores.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Giulio Tagliafico; Simona Tosto; Alessio Signori; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Thomas J Zhou; Don Edwards
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 3.  Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Francesca Valdora; Federica Rossi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Giovanna Mariscotto; Alberto Tagliafico
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Fully Automated Convolutional Neural Network Method for Quantification of Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue and Background Parenchymal Enhancement.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Eralda Mema; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Ralph T Wynn; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Dose-response effects of aerobic exercise on estrogen among women at high risk for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Nancy I Williams; Despina Kontos; Susan Domchek; Knashawn H Morales; Wei-Ting Hwang; Lorita L Grant; Laura DiGiovanni; Domenick Salvatore; Desire' Fenderson; Mitchell Schnall; Mary Lou Galantino; Jill Stopfer; Mindy S Kurzer; Shandong Wu; Jessica Adelman; Justin C Brown; Jerene Good
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Elizabeth A Morris; Jennifer B Kaplan; Donna D'Alessio; Debra Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Marissa Albert; Freya Schnabel; Jennifer Chun; Shira Schwartz; Jiyon Lee; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 8.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Rhea D Chitalia; Despina Kontos; Linda Moy; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response.

Authors:  H Preibsch; L Wanner; S D Bahrs; B M Wietek; K C Siegmann-Luz; E Oberlecher; M Hahn; A Staebler; K Nikolaou; B Wiesinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Interpretive Performance in Community-based Practices.

Authors:  Kimberly M Ray; Karla Kerlikowske; Iryna V Lobach; Michael B Hofmann; Heather I Greenwood; Vignesh A Arasu; Nola M Hylton; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.