Literature DB >> 26346744

Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characterization of macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma bovis isolates from multiple provinces in China.

Ling-Cong Kong1, Duo Gao, Bo-Yan Jia, Zi Wang, Yun-Hang Gao, Zhi-Hua Pei, Shu-Ming Liu, Jiu-Qing Xin, Hong-Xia Ma.   

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis has spread widely throughout the world via animal movement and has become an important pathogen of bovine respiratory disease. However, the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials for Mycoplasma bovis have not been studied in China. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Mycoplasma bovis isolated from young cattle with respiratory infection in China. Mycoplasma bovis was detected in 32/45 bovine respiratory infection outbreaks at beef farms in 8 provinces in China. The isolates were susceptible or had medium sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and doxycycline, but were frequently resistant to macrolides (13/32, 41%). An A2058G (Escherichia coli Numbering) mutation located in the rrnA operon in domain V of 23S rRNA was observed in strains that were resistant to macrolides. This single mutations at the rrnA operon in domain V of 23S rRNA may play an important role in the resistance of Mycoplasma bovis strains to macrolides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26346744      PMCID: PMC4785120          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) was first isolated from a severe case of mastitis in cattle in the United States in 1961 [7]. Subsequently, the results of some studies have suggested that M. bovis can cause respiratory infection, arthritis and tenosynovitis in feedlot cattle [2]. In recent years, M. bovis has spread widely to all parts of the world via animal movement and has become an important pathogen of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in China and other countries [5]. The BRD caused by M. bovis is mainly treated with antibiotics, including veterinary macrolide antibiotics and fluoroquinolones in China, but treatment of BRD with macrolides often fails, leading to important economical losses in China. Macrolide resistance has been described for pathogens of BRD, including M. bovis, Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica, in different countries. However, we found that the macrolide resistance of these pathogens is quite different in different countries. The genes msr(E) mph(E) and erm(42) have been shown to confer resistance to macrolides in Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica in Germany [11]. However, high-level macrolide resistance of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica isolated in Europe can be due to 23S rRNA mutations [12]. One study of M. bovis isolated in Israel found that a combination of mutations in two domains of 23S rRNA is necessary to achieve higher minimum inhibitory concentrations of macrolides (MICs, ≥128 µg/ml) [8]. However, little research on this topic has been conducted in China. Therefore, systematic monitoring of antibiotic susceptibility and determination of the macrolide resistance mechanism of M. bovis strains in China are important. A total of 32 M. bovis strains originating from 32 feedlot cattle herds located in 8 provinces in China (Jilin, Heilongjiang, Neimenggu, Liaoning, Shandong, Hebei, Henan and Jiangsu) were tested in this study. Samples from lungs and nasal swabs were collected from distinct outbreaks between 2011 and 2013. All samples were incubated on pleuropneumonia-like organism (PPLO) agar plates. Suspected colonies with typical “fried egg” morphology were selected from each sample and identified using biochemical methods and PCR assay, as described previously [13]. The number of color changing units (CCU) was calculated, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the microplate dilution method [4, 10]. Two-fold dilutions of antibiotics from 0.03 to 256 µg/ml were tested. Because there are no CLSI-approved MIC cut-off values for veterinary Mycoplasma species, it is difficult to interpret the impact of antimicrobial activity in vitro. CLSI-approved interpretative criteria for other respiratory bovine pathogens are frequently used to understand the implication of M. bovis sensitivity testing in vitro [6, 14]. The cut-off values for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (susceptible, ≤0.25 µg/ml; resistant, ≥2 µg/ml), doxycycline (susceptible, ≤4 µg/ml; resistant, ≥16 µg/ml), clindamycin (susceptible, ≤0.5 µg/ml; resistant, ≥4 µg/ml), tulathromycin (susceptible, ≤16 µg/ml; resistant, ≥64 µg/ml) and florfenicol (susceptible, ≤2 µg/ml; resistant, ≥8 µg/ml) were defined, and the cut-off values for macrolides (susceptible, ≤16 µg/ml; resistant, ≥64 µg/ml) were defined by dichotomizing the latest CLSI criteria for veterinary pathogenic bacteria BRD [3]. The reference strains, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and M. bovis type strain PG45 (ATCC 25523), were used for a quality control. To identify rRNA mutations of M. bovis that confer resistance to macrolides, the two alleles that contain domain II and domain V were detected. PCR was performed according to a previous study [8]. The primers and program are shown in Table 1. PCR was performed in a 25 µl reaction volume containing 2.5 µl 10 × PCR buffer, 0.5 mmol L−1 dNTP, 0.5 µmol L−1 of each primer, 15.6 µl PCR water and 1 U LA-Taq polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Japan). The sequences were compared with the sequence of PG45, and sequences editing, consensus and alignment construction were performed by DNASTAR and ClustalW. Numbering of nucleotide and amino acid positions is based on the 23 rRNA gene or L4/L22 proteins of Escherichia coli, respectively.
Table 1.

MICs distribution of M. bovis isolates

Amplifictaion targetPrimerPrimers sequence (5′–3′)ProductAnnealing Temperature
(bp)(°C)
rrnArrnA-FGGATATCTAACGCCGTGTCT5,04150
rrnA-RGTACTGGTCAGCTCAACAC
rrnBrrnB-FGCATGCAAGGTTAAGCAG2,84850
rrnB-RCTAATTCCAAGTGCCACTAGCG
L4L4-FTTTAGAAAAAAGAAATGAAGACAA60349
L4-RCTACTCATATTGGCGATCTAGTT
L22L22-FATGAGTACTCAACAAGCTAAAGCA32949
L22-RAATGCTATTGATAAATTAGATGTTC
Then, the MIC of erythromycin was determined in the presence of the potent efflux inhibitors, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazones (CCCPs) and verapamil, at appropriate concentrations using the broth microdilution method [17]. Some previous studies have found that MICs change in the presence or absence of inhibitors due to changes in the level of activity of efflux pumps. However, a two-fold reduction is not sufficient to rule out false positives. Thus, a four-fold or greater reduction in strain MICs in the presence of inhibitors is considered to be due to the activity of efflux pumps [9, 18]. Each experiment was repeated three times. The MIC values of the 10 antimicrobial agents obtained from the examinations of the China M. bovis isolates are shown in Table 2, and the MIC values for PG45 were as follows: erythromycin (2 µg/ml), azithromycin (2 µg/ml), kitasamycin (2 µg/ml), tylosin (0.125 µg/ml), clindamycin (0.125 µg/ml), lincomycin (0.25 µg/ml), doxycycline (0.03 µg/ml), ciprofloxacin (0.125 µg/ml), enrofloxacin (0.125 µg/ml) and florfenicol (2 µg/ml). Fluoroquinolones were found to be the most active compounds in vitro (MIC ≤1 µg/ml). For one isolate, the MIC for florfenicol was high (MIC=8 µg/ml), while the rest of the strains were inhibited by florfenicol at lower concentrations (MIC ≤4 µg/ml). Thirteen (41%) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, tylosin, azithromycin and kitasamycin, with MICs ≥64 µg/ml. The MICs of clindamycin and lincomycin were different in two distinct populations of isolates: 13 strains yielded MICs ≥128 µg/ml, while the rest yielded MICs ≤0.125 µg/ml. These results are in accordance with previous studies in other countries, which found that the most active compounds were fluoroquinolones and florfenicol [15, 16]. However, macrolides have been used traditionally and are losing their efficacy against M. bovis in many countries, which is in accordance with our results, as many M. bovis strains in China are already resistant to macrolides. Furthermore, the strains that were resistant to macrolides were also resistant to lincomycin and clindamycin, which has been previously observed in other Mycoplasma of animal and human origins. The mechanism of this resistance probably involves rRNA mutations [1, 10].
Table 2.

MICs distribution of M. bovis isolates

The 23S rRNA gene sequences of susceptible strains and resistance strains were analyzed (Table 3). The macrolide-resistant strains only had one mutation type, an A2058G substitution in domain V in the rrnA operon of the 23S rRNA. None of the macrolide-resistant strains contained substitutions in the rrnB operon. Additionally, there were no significant differences in domain II of L4 or L22 ribosomal proteins between resistant and susceptibl isolates. The A2058G substitution in domain V was the most prevalent substitution in our study and a previous study [8], and this single mutation may play an important role in the resistance of M. bovis strains to macrolides. However, other point mutations were found in previous studies in one or two domains of 23SrRNA, including G748A, C752T, A2059G and A2059C, which can reduce the sensitivity of M. bovis to tylosin and tilmicosin. Differences in the genotypes of different M. bovis strains may be due to differences in their evolutionary courses in different countries or to the development of different resistance mechanisms. Our results indicate that the values of erythromycin and azithromycin were not decreased in the presence of CCCP (32 µg/ml and 64 µg/ml for both antibiotics, respectively) or verapamil (64 µg/ml and 128 µg/ml, respectively) in highly resistant strains, and Chinese macrolide-resistant strains were negative for antibiotic efflux. Whether M. bovis strains have other resistance mechanisms should be investigated further in future studies.
Table 3.

Molecular characterization of macrolides-resistant M. bovis field isolates

Isolate typesNo. of isolates23S rRNA23S rRNA23S rRNA23S rRNAL4L22
Domain II rrnADomain V rrnADomain II rrnBDomain V rrnBribosomal proteinribosomal protein
resistant isolates13NoneA2058GNoneNoneNoneNone
susceptible isolates19NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
This is the first report of systematic monitoring of antibiotic susceptibility of M. bovis in China. We believe that studies should be performed to evaluate changes in MIC values and genetic mutations to determine the prevalence of M. bovis strains that are resistant to different antimicrobials.
  16 in total

1.  Increased MICs of gamithromycin and tildipirosin in the presence of the genes erm(42) and msr(E)-mph(E) for bovine Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica.

Authors:  Geovana Brenner Michael; Christopher Eidam; Kristina Kadlec; Kerstin Meyer; Michael T Sweeney; Robert W Murray; Jeffrey L Watts; Stefan Schwarz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Mycoplasma bovis in respiratory disease of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Jeff L Caswell; Ken G Bateman; Hugh Y Cai; Fernanda Castillo-Alcala
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Acquired resistance to the 16-membered macrolides tylosin and tilmicosin by Mycoplasma bovis.

Authors:  Uri Lerner; Eytan Amram; Roger D Ayling; Inna Mikula; Irena Gerchman; Shimon Harrus; Dina Teff; David Yogev; Inna Lysnyansky
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  In vitro antimicrobial inhibition of Mycoplasma bovis isolates submitted to the Pennsylvania Animal Diagnostic Laboratory using flow cytometry and a broth microdilution method.

Authors:  Marty K Soehnlen; M Elaine Kunze; K Eranda Karunathilake; Brittnee M Henwood; Subhashinie Kariyawasam; David R Wolfgang; Bhushan M Jayarao
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.279

5.  Molecular cloning of the gyrA gene and characterization of its mutation in clinical isolates of quinolone-resistant Edwardsiella tarda.

Authors:  Soon Bum Shin; Min Ho Yoo; Joon Bum Jeong; Young Min Kim; Joon-Ki Chung; Min Do Huh; Jack L Komisar; Hyun Do Jeong
Journal:  Dis Aquat Organ       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 1.802

6.  In vitro antimicrobial inhibition profiles of Mycoplasma bovis isolates recovered from various regions of the United States from 2002 to 2003.

Authors:  Ricardo F Rosenbusch; Joann M Kinyon; Michael Apley; Nathan D Funk; Sean Smith; Lorraine J Hoffman
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 7.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae: susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  Cécile Bébéar; Sabine Pereyre; Olivia Peuchant
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.165

8.  Amino acid substitutions in GyrA and ParC are associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma bovis isolates from Japanese dairy calves.

Authors:  Toyotaka Sato; Torahiko Okubo; Masaru Usui; Hidetoshi Higuchi; Yutaka Tamura
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.267

9.  Molecular analysis of the gyrA and gyrB quinolone resistance-determining regions of fluoroquinolone-resistant Clostridium difficile mutants selected in vitro.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia; Fabrizio Barbanti; Thomas Louie; Frédéric Barbut; Paola Mastrantonio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Overall decrease in the susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis to antimicrobials over the past 30 years in France.

Authors:  Anne V Gautier-Bouchardon; Séverine Ferré; Dominique Le Grand; Agnès Paoli; Emilie Gay; François Poumarat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mutations Associated with Decreased Susceptibility to Seven Antimicrobial Families in Field and Laboratory-Derived Mycoplasma bovis Strains.

Authors:  Kinga M Sulyok; Zsuzsa Kreizinger; Enikő Wehmann; Inna Lysnyansky; Krisztián Bányai; Szilvia Marton; Ákos Jerzsele; Zsuzsanna Rónai; Ibolya Turcsányi; László Makrai; Szilárd Jánosi; Sára Ágnes Nagy; Miklós Gyuranecz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relationship between Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Multilocus Sequence Type of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates and Development of a Method for Rapid Detection of Point Mutations Involved in Decreased Susceptibility to Macrolides, Lincosamides, Tetracyclines, and Spectinomycin.

Authors:  Eiji Hata; Takehiro Harada; Megumi Itoh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Whole-Genome Sequencing and Concordance Between Antimicrobial Susceptibility Genotypes and Phenotypes of Bacterial Isolates Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Joseph R Owen; Noelle Noyes; Amy E Young; Daniel J Prince; Patricia C Blanchard; Terry W Lehenbauer; Sharif S Aly; Jessica H Davis; Sean M O'Rourke; Zaid Abdo; Keith Belk; Michael R Miller; Paul Morley; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Genetic Markers for Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycoplasma bovis.

Authors:  Jade Bokma; Nick Vereecke; Hans Nauwynck; Freddy Haesebrouck; Sebastiaan Theuns; Bart Pardon; Filip Boyen
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-06

5.  Emergence and Mechanism of Resistance of Tulathromycin Against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in a PK/PD Model and the Fitness Costs of 23S rRNA Mutants.

Authors:  Xirui Xia; Lan Yang; Yuzhou Ling; Jiao Yu; Huanzhong Ding
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 6.  Mycoplasma bovis: Mechanisms of Resistance and Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility.

Authors:  Inna Lysnyansky; Roger D Ayling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.