| Literature DB >> 35224081 |
Xirui Xia1, Lan Yang1, Yuzhou Ling1, Jiao Yu1, Huanzhong Ding1.
Abstract
Macrolides are widely used in diseases caused by Mycoplasma spp. The new semi-synthetic macrolide antibiotic tulathromycin is currently in wide use for the treatment of respiratory diseases of livestock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of tulathromycin against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to reveal mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and to evaluate the fitness of drug-resistant strains. In this study, high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine drug concentrations for the in vitro model after dosing. The peak concentrations were in the range 0.3125-20 μg/mL (1 × MIC-64 × MIC). The ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 72 h divided by the MIC (AUC72h/MIC) had the highest correlation with the antibacterial effect of tulathromycin against M. hyopneumoniae. Tulathromycin also showed concentration-dependent antimicrobial effects and promoted the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria after being cultured for 168 h and most were mutations in 23S rRNA at site A2058G (E.coli numbering) and only a single isolate was an A2058T (E.coli numbering) mutant. In the presence of reserpine, we determined the MIC of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, tiamulin and tylosin against these drug-resistant bacteria and the strains with efflux pump mechanisms were found among the strains resistant to tilmicosin. Gene expression analysis indicated that the ABC and MATE transporter efflux pump genes RS01935, RS02670, RS01115, RS01970, RS02395 and RS03540 (MATE family efflux transporter) were up-regulated in the three strains (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). These investigations provide guidance for clinical administration of tulathromycin and elucidate the mechanism and fitness cost of drug resistance in M. hyopneumoniae.Entities:
Keywords: 23S rRNA; Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; fitness cost; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic; tulathromycin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35224081 PMCID: PMC8873822 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.801800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
MIC and MPC of four antibiotics against M. hyopneumoniae and mutants.
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| ATCC25934 | 0.3125 | 0.08 | 1.6 | 0.0625 | 0.625 | 0.32 | 12.8 | - |
| MTUL1 | 320 | 0.16 | 1638.4 | 64 | >320 | 0.64 | >320 | A2058T |
| MTUL2 | 320 | 0.16 | 1638.4 | 32 | >320 | 0.64 | >320 | A2058G |
| MTIA1 | 0.3125 | 0.32 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.625 | 2.56 | 12.8 | A2059T |
| MTIA2 | 0.3125 | 0.64 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.625 | 2.56 | 12.8 | A2059T |
| MTIL1 | 160/0.3125 | 0.08/0.08 | 819.2/3.2 | 8/0.125 | 320 | 0.32 | >320 | – |
| MTIL2 | 160/0.3125 | 0.08/0.08 | 1638.4/6.4 | 16/0.125 | 320 | 0.32 | >320 | – |
| MTIL3 | 320/80 | 0.16/0.08 | 1638.4/409.6 | 16/8 | >320 | 0.64 | >320 | A2058G |
MIC in the presence of 5 μg/mL reserpine.
Figure 1Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results in dynamic models. (A) Time-kill curves for tulathromycin at constant concentrations. The red dash represents the method detection limit (B) Concentration-time curves for 7 levels of tulathromycin for the in vitro dynamic model. (C) Dynamic time-kill curves depicted at 0–64 × MIC for tulathromycin. The initial concentration of tulathromycin in the reaction bottle. The red dash represents the method detection limit (D). Numbers of 23S rRNA mutants in colonies collected from the reaction bottle every 24 h.
Estimation of PK/PD parameters, and data are derived from the E model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC0−72/MIC (h) | −0.47 | 1303.91 | −6.05 | 0.38 | 0.9929 |
| −0.47 | 8.21 | −6.32 | 0.41 | 0.9867 | |
| %T>MIC | −0.46 | 17.45 | −4.12 | 0.80 | 0.8964 |
Figure 2(A–H) Total and resistant bacterial CFU at the indicated initial concentration in the reaction bottles. (I–L) Growth conditions of 4 representative strains in the presence of reserpine as indicated. To verify whether reserpine affects strain growth. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Estimation of AUC0−168/MIC (h) and increases in antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 2.93 | |
| EC50 | 111.87 |
| 0.27 | |
|
| 0.9761 |
Figure 3Expression of genes associated with active efflux in the indicated strains. The Y-axis number represents the negative logarithm of the p-value (The black dash represents P-value = 0.05, significant difference; The red dash represents P-value = 0.01, extremely significant difference). The values of the X-axis are expression quantity. Strains MTIL1, MTIL2 and MTIL3 are represented by the black, red and green spots, respectively. The numbers above the spots represent the gene numbers (see Supplementary Table). (A) Comparison of gene expression levels of efflux pump in three strains. (B–D) The efflux pump genes expression levels of the three strains were respectively displayed.
Figure 4Fitness cost analysis of 23S rRNA mutants. (A–C) Growth curve of drug-resistant mutants and parental strains in co-culture. (D–F) Growth of drug-resistant mutants and parental strain cultured separately. (G) Relative fitness of all 7 mutants. Error bars show standard deviations. **P < 0.01.
Growth kinetic parameters of drug resistant strains and parental ATCC 25934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.81/6.83 | 5.94/8.51 | 5.65/6.97 | 6.65/ 9.55 | 5.08/9.60 | 7.31/9.68 | 5.84/9.49 | 5.82/8.45 | 7.85/9.22 | 8.07/11.92 |
Growth kinetic parameters values are expressed as “single-cultured/co-cultured”.