PURPOSE: Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains an obstacle to safe distal pancreatectomy (DP). A thick pancreatic parenchyma is a major risk factor for PF. In this paper, we elucidate the feasibility of the new closure method using soft coagulation and polyglycolic acid felt with fibrin glue. METHODS: In 2009-2013, 96 patients underwent DP with a novel closure method for pancreatic stump that utilized soft coagulation and polyglycolic acid felt with fibrin glue. We evaluated amylase levels in drainage fluid on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 and the incidence of postoperative PF according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definitions. RESULTS: Drain amylase levels on POD1 and POD3 were 275 and 241 U/L, respectively, and ISGPF-defined Grade B/C PF rates were 16.7%. No clinical factors were significantly associated with PF. Average pancreatic parenchymal thicknesses were similar in PF-positive and PF-negative patients (10.4 ± 2.6 mm vs. 10.1 ± 2.2 mm, P = 0.639). There was no significant difference in the postoperative PF rate between patients with thick (≥12 mm) and thin (<12 mm) pancreas (11.1 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.544). CONCLUSION: Our novel pancreatic stump closure method appears to be simple and effective, particularly in patients with thick pancreas.
PURPOSE:Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains an obstacle to safe distal pancreatectomy (DP). A thick pancreatic parenchyma is a major risk factor for PF. In this paper, we elucidate the feasibility of the new closure method using soft coagulation and polyglycolic acid felt with fibrin glue. METHODS: In 2009-2013, 96 patients underwent DP with a novel closure method for pancreatic stump that utilized soft coagulation and polyglycolic acid felt with fibrin glue. We evaluated amylase levels in drainage fluid on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 and the incidence of postoperative PF according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definitions. RESULTS: Drain amylase levels on POD1 and POD3 were 275 and 241 U/L, respectively, and ISGPF-defined Grade B/C PF rates were 16.7%. No clinical factors were significantly associated with PF. Average pancreatic parenchymal thicknesses were similar in PF-positive and PF-negative patients (10.4 ± 2.6 mm vs. 10.1 ± 2.2 mm, P = 0.639). There was no significant difference in the postoperative PF rate between patients with thick (≥12 mm) and thin (<12 mm) pancreas (11.1 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.544). CONCLUSION: Our novel pancreatic stump closure method appears to be simple and effective, particularly in patients with thick pancreas.
Authors: Joseph A Blansfield; Megan M Rapp; Ravi J Chokshi; Nicole L Woll; Marie A Hunsinger; David G Sheldon; Mohsen M Shabahang Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Matthias Reeh; Michael F Nentwich; Dean Bogoevski; Alexandra M Koenig; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Jakob R Izbicki; Maximilian Bockhorn Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Seong-Ryong Kim; Hye-Jin Yi; Yu Na Lee; Ji Yoon Park; Robert M Hoffman; Teruo Okano; In Kyong Shim; Song Cheol Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.379