Gong Di1, Yu Weihong1, Zhang Xiao1, Yang Zhikun1, Zou Xuan1, Qu Yi1, Dong Fangtian2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No. 1 Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No. 1 Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. d_fangtian@sina.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the area and radius of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with DM (113 eyes) and 62 healthy controls (85 eyes) were included in the study. All of the participants underwent examination with OCT angiography. The vertical radius (VR), horizontal radius (HR) and area of the FAZ were measured. RESULTS: The differences in HR, VR and area between the control and DM groups were statistically significant (p = 0.01, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the no-diabetic retinopathy (DR) group in HR or VR (p = 0.07 and 0.08, respectively), but there was a statistically significant difference in area (p = 0.04). The size of the FAZ was greater in patients with DR compared to the control group. The differences in HR, VR and area were statistically significant (p = 0.01, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively). In addition, the clinically significant macular oedema (CSME) group also had a larger FAZ area than the non-CSME group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM had a larger FAZ, and patients with more severely damaged retinas had a much larger FAZ. OCT angiography is a new convenient and noninvasive method for studying the FAZ. This novel examination will yield considerable amounts of data that cannot be obtained using previous research methods.
PURPOSE: To investigate the area and radius of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with DM (113 eyes) and 62 healthy controls (85 eyes) were included in the study. All of the participants underwent examination with OCT angiography. The vertical radius (VR), horizontal radius (HR) and area of the FAZ were measured. RESULTS: The differences in HR, VR and area between the control and DM groups were statistically significant (p = 0.01, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the no-diabetic retinopathy (DR) group in HR or VR (p = 0.07 and 0.08, respectively), but there was a statistically significant difference in area (p = 0.04). The size of the FAZ was greater in patients with DR compared to the control group. The differences in HR, VR and area were statistically significant (p = 0.01, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively). In addition, the clinically significant macular oedema (CSME) group also had a larger FAZ area than the non-CSME group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with DM had a larger FAZ, and patients with more severely damaged retinas had a much larger FAZ. OCT angiography is a new convenient and noninvasive method for studying the FAZ. This novel examination will yield considerable amounts of data that cannot be obtained using previous research methods.
Authors: Dae Yu Kim; Jeff Fingler; Robert J Zawadzki; Susanna S Park; Lawrence S Morse; Daniel M Schwartz; Scott E Fraser; John S Werner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C P Wilkinson; Frederick L Ferris; Ronald E Klein; Paul P Lee; Carl David Agardh; Matthew Davis; Diana Dills; Anselm Kampik; R Pararajasegaram; Juan T Verdaguer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Dae Yu Kim; Jeff Fingler; John S Werner; Daniel M Schwartz; Scott E Fraser; Robert J Zawadzki Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Giselle Lynch; Jorge S Andrade Romo; Rachel Linderman; Brian D Krawitz; Shelley Mo; Amir Zakik; Joseph Carroll; Richard B Rosen; Toco Y P Chui Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Fatih Mehmet Türkcü; Alparslan Şahin; Ümit Karaalp; Yasin Çınar; Muhammed Şahin; Zeynep Gürsel Özkurt; Uğur Keklikçi Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Sonja G Karst; Gabor G Deak; Bianca S Gerendas; Sebastian M Waldstein; Jan Lammer; Christian Simader; Tadhg Guerin; Ursula M Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Edmund Arthur; Joel A Papay; Bryan P Haggerty; Christopher A Clark; Ann E Elsner Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Giovanni William Oliverio; Ida Ceravolo; Ahsan Bhatti; Costantino John Trombetta Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 2.031