Literature DB >> 7595237

Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit?

R P Cole1, R C Barnet, R R Miller.   

Abstract

This research examined whether the effect of relative stimulus validity (A.R. Wagner, F.A. Logan, K. Haberlandt, & T. Price, 1968) is a deficit of acquisition or performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated the relative validity effect using rats in a conditioned lick suppression. task. A target cue trained in the presence of another cue that was a more valid predictor of reinforcement exhibited less behavioral control than a target cue that had been trained in the presence of an equally valid predictor of reinforcement. In Experiment 2, the more valid predictor was extinguished after training. This manipulation increased responding to the target cue, thereby attenuating the effect of low relative validity. This outcome suggests that the relative validity effect is a performance deficit. In addition, recovery from the relative validity deficit was specific to the particular target stimulus that was trained in the presence of the subsequently extinguished cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7595237     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.4.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  13 in total

1.  Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Trial number and compound stimuli temporal relationship as joint determinants of second-order conditioning and conditioned inhibition.

Authors:  Steven Stout; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Timing of fear expression in trace and delay conditioning measured by fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Jonathan C Gewirtz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Is stimulus competition an acquisition deficit or a performance deficit?

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  Enhancement of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition achieved by posttraining inflation of the training excitor.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Amundson; Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2005-08-01

6.  Contrasting predictions of extended comparator hypothesis and acquisition-focused models of learning concerning retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

7.  Bayes and blickets: effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; David M Sobel; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Alison Gopnik
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-10-04

8.  A comparative approach to cue competition with one and two strong predictors.

Authors:  Irina Baetu; A G Baker; Christine Darredeau; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Stimulus competition between a discrete cue and a training context: Cue competition does not result from the division of a limited resource.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

10.  Retrospective revaluation of associative retroactive cue interference.

Authors:  Gonzalo Miguez; Mario A Laborda; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.