| Literature DB >> 26341632 |
Vincent M Monnier1,2, Wanjie Sun3, Xiaoyu Gao4, David R Sell5, Patricia A Cleary6, John M Lachin7, Saul Genuth8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We recently reported strong associations between eight skin collagen AGEs and two solubility markers from skin biopsies obtained at DCCT study closeout and the long-term progression of microvascular disease in EDIC, despite adjustment for mean glycemia. Herein we investigated the hypothesis that some of these AGEs (fluorescence to be reported elsewhere) correlate with long-term subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) measurements, i.e. coronary artery calcium score (CAC) at EDIC year 7-9 (n = 187), change of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) from EDIC year 1 to year 6 and 12 (n = 127), and cardiac MRI outcomes at EDIC year 15-16 (n = 142).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26341632 PMCID: PMC4560872 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-015-0266-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Clinical characteristics of skin donors at DCCT baseline and mean AGE levels at time of DCCT biopsy
| Primary | Secondary | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 216 | 123 | 93 | |
| DCCT baseline | |||
| Female (%) | 53 % | 41 % | |
| Age (years) | 27.1 (6.8) | 29.6 (6.5) | 0.009 |
| Duration (months) | 2.7 (1.4) | 8.6 (4) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) (mmol/mol) | 9.1 (1.8) | 8.9 (1.5) | |
| Mean blood glucose (mg/dl) | 230.4 (82.8) | 225.6 (71.5) | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 72.4 (50.5) | 92.9 (51.6) | <0.001 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 178.3 (32.7) | 179.1 (36.5) | 0.006 |
| Retinopathy (%) | |||
| 10/10: None | 100 | 0 | |
| 20/≤20: Microaneurysms only | 0 | 60 | |
| 30/≤30: Mild NPDR | 0 | 28 | |
| 45/≤45: Moderate NPDR | 0 | 11 | |
| AER >40 mg/24 h | 1 | 10 | 0.003 |
| Confirmed clinical neuropathy (%) | 3 | 14 | 0.004 |
| sBP (mmHg) | 114.7 (11.9) | 119.4 (10.5) | |
| dBP (mmHg) | 72.9 (8.5) | 75.1 (7.8) | |
| AGEs and solubility parameters | |||
| Acid soluble (%) | 0.5 (0.3) | 0.6 (0.4) | |
| CEL (pmol/mg collagen) | 141.4 (104) | 152.5 (111.1) | |
| CML (pmol/mg collagen) | 527.8 (140.4) | 548.1 (119.2) | |
| Furosine (pmol/mg collagen) | 756.2 (239.9) | 786.2 (219.8) | |
| G-H1 (pmol/mg collagen) | 66.8 (30.7) | 63.6 (38) | |
| GSPNE (nmol/mg collagen) | 2.5 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | |
| MG-H1 (nmol/mg collagen) | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.8 (0.5) | |
| Pentosidine (pmol/mg collagen) | 25.3 (6.2) | 26.6 (8.6) | |
| Pepsin Soluble (%) | 6.8 (3.5) | 6.5 (3) | |
Subclinical cardiovascular outcomes of the skin biopsy study participants during EDIC
| Primary | Secondary | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intima-media thickening study (N = 127) | |||
| EDIC year 1 | 6 (0.7) | 6.2 (0.8) | |
| EDIC year 6 | 6.2 (0.8) | 6.5 (0.8) | 0.003 |
| EDIC year 12 | 6.8 (0.9) | 7.1 (1.1) | |
| Coronary calcium study (N = 187) | |||
| CAC Mean (Agatston units) | 23 (109.2) | 91.7 (281) | 0.002 |
| Cardiac MRI studies (N = 142) | |||
| Left ventricular end diastolic mass (g) | 146.6 (33.2) | 149.6 (35.8) | |
| End diastolic volume (ml) | 144.1 (34.4) | 140.6 (31.6) | |
| End systolic volume (ml) | 56.5 (16.3) | 55.4 (17.7) | |
| Stroke volume (ml) | 87.5 (21.7) | 85.2 (19.4) | |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 6 (1.5) | 5.9 (1.3) | |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 60.8 (5) | 61 (6.9) | |
| LV mass/end diastolic volume (g/ml) | 1 (0.2) | 1.1 (0.2) | |
Associations of AGEs with sub-clinical cardiovascular disease outcomes
| N | Furosine | CML | Pentosidine | Pepsin soluble | Acid soluble | CEL | G-H1 | MG-H1 | Glucosepane | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coronary artery calcification | ||||||||||
| CAC score (correlation coefficient, p value, FDR#)^ | 187 |
| 0.12 | 0.12 | −0.14 | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| CAC score = 0 vs. CAC score >0 (mean ± std) | 131 | 749 | 528 (129) | 25.3 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 151 | 61 | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 56 | 817 | 560 | 27.6 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 146 | 71 | 0.8 | 2.5 | |
|
|
| 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.76 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.7 | 0.32 | |
| CAC score <100 vs. CAC score >100 (mean ± std) | 170 | 766 | 535 | 25.8 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 148 | 64 | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 17 | 808 | 567 | 27.2 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 162 | 72 | 0.9 | 2.6 | |
| P-Value (FDR)+,# | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.29 | 0.65 | |
| Common IMT (correlation) | ||||||||||
| Year 6 | 127 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.13 | −0.11 | 0.02 | 0.10 | −0.06 |
|
|
| Change: year 6–year 1 | 127 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| − | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
|
|
| Year 12 | 127 | 0.15 | 0.06 | −0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| Change: year 12–year 1 | 127 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.02 | −0.13 | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| Cardiac MRI studies | ||||||||||
| LV Mass (g) | 142 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| −0.16 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
| 0.07 |
| End diastolic volume (ml) | 142 | −0.05 | −0.02 | 0.09 | −0.10 | −0.10 | 0.06 | −0.12 | 0.00 | −0.07 |
| End systolic volume (ml) | 142 | −0.06 | −0.02 | 0.07 | −0.07 | 0.00 | 0.07 | −0.06 | 0.01 | −0.09 |
| Stroke volume (ml) | 142 | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.07 | −0.07 | −0.12 | 0.04 | −0.10 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
| Cardiac (L/min) | 142 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.06 | −0.08 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.08 | 0.05 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 142 | 0.02 | −0.05 | −0.07 | 0.05 | −0.07 | −0.02 | −0.04 | −0.04 | 0.01 |
| LV mass/end diastolic volume (g/ml) | 142 |
|
| 0.08 | −0.13 | −0.13 | −0.05 | 0.09 |
| 0.15 |
Italic values indicate statistically significant associations
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
^Analyses of correlations and their associated p values used Spearman correlations.
+P values between categorical results were generated using the Wilcoxon two sample test.
#Numbers in parentheses are the Benjamini and Hochberg’s FDR alpha adjustment.
Multivariable regressions of AGE effect on CT calcification outcomes (N = 187)
| CAC score (quantitative)* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Covariate effects from multiple models | X2 | P value | Geometric mean ratio (95 % CI)^ |
| Furosine: | |||
| Unadjusted for A1c | 5.7 |
| 5.6 (1.4, 22.7) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| DCCT mean A1c | 1.3 | 0.26 | 3.8 (0.4, 37.3) |
| EDIC mean A1c | 4.4 |
| 5.0 (1.1, 22.2) |
| DCCT mean A1c: | |||
| Unadjusted | 5.0 |
| 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| Furosine | 0.2 | 0.68 | 1.2 (0.5, 3.0) |
| EDIC mean A1c: | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.6 | 0.52 | 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) |
Italic values indicate statistically significant associations
* Models for CAC mean score were based on a Tobit-censored regression which evaluated the effect of AGE or HbA1c on the outcome of log (CT score)-log (lowest detectable CT score) allowing for unmeasurable values below the lower limit of quantification. Both unadjusted and adjusted models were adjusted for scanning site, baseline age, diabetes duration, sex, and DCCT baseline retinopathy cohort (primary vs. secondary). Adjusted models further included both AGE and HbA1c as risk factors.
** Models for CAC >0 and CAC >100 were based on a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLIMMIX) logistic regression which evaluated the effect of AGE or HbA1c on the prevalence of CAC >0 or CAC >100. Both unadjusted and adjusted models were adjusted for baseline age, diabetes duration, sex, and DCCT baseline retinopathy cohort (primary vs. secondary) with scanning site as a random effect. Adjusted models further included both AGE and HbA1c as risk factors
^Geometric mean ratio of CAC scores was the ratio of predicted CAC scores for a one unit increase in HbA1c.
#Odds ratio was the ratio of odds for CAC > 0 or CAC > 100 based on a one unit increase in HbA1c.
Multivariable regressions of AGE effect on IMT outcomes (N = 127)
| IMT change from year 1 to year 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Covariate effects from multiple models* | t value | P value | LSMean difference (95 % CI)^ |
| MG-H1 | |||
| Unadjusted | 2.6 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| DCCT mean A1c | 2.5 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) |
| EDIC mean A1c | 2.7 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) |
| Pentosidine | |||
| Unadjusted | 2.4 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| DCCT mean A1c | 2.4 |
| 0.02 (0.00, 0.03) |
| EDIC mean A1c | 2.3 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) |
| Glucosepane | |||
| Unadjusted | 2.0 |
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| DCCT mean A1c | 0.7 | 0.48 | 0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) |
| EDIC mean A1c | −0.4 | 0.67 | −0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) |
| Pepsin soluble | |||
| Unadjusted | −2.0 |
| −0.03 (−0.06, -0.00) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| DCCT mean A1c | −1.9 | 0.06 | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.00) |
| EDIC mean A1c | −1.7 | 0.08 | −0.03 (−0.06, 0.00) |
| DCCT mean A1c: | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.7 | 0.48 | 0.02 (−0.01, 0.01) |
| EDIC mean A1c: | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.5 | 0.14 | 0.05 (−0.00, 0.02) |
Italic values indicate statistically significant associations
* Models were based on a general linear regression which evaluated the effect of respective AGE or HbA1c on the change of IMT from EDIC year 1 to year 6. Both unadjusted and adjusted models were adjusted for IMT levels at EDIC year 1. Adjusted models further included both the respective AGE and HbA1c as risk factors.
^LSMean difference was the difference of estimated Least Square mean of IMT change from EDIC year 1 to year 6 based on a one standard deviation increase in AGE (Pentosidine: 7.3, Pepsin soluble: 6.7, MG-H1: 0.44, GSPNE: 0.66: or a one unit increase in HbA1c.