Literature DB >> 26341509

Influence of different infracardial positions of central venous catheters in hemodynamic monitoring using the transpulmonal thermodilution method.

Patrick Kellner1,2, Viola Schleusener3, Frank Bauerfeind2, Jens Soukup4,5.   

Abstract

Hemodynamic measurements are often conducted by the transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-based PiCCO(®)-system. This requires a central-venous (CVC) and a thermistor-tipped arterial catheter, usually placed in the femoral artery. In certain clinical situations, CVC devices have to be placed in the inferior vena cava. However, little is known about the influence of different CVC positions (i.e. ipsi- vs. contra-lateral to the arterial catheter) on the accuracy of the TPTD measurement results. In this prospective observational study surgical intensive care unit patients who had been inserted with CVCs either into the superior (CVCVCS) or the inferior vena cava (CVCinf) in addition to an arterial PiCCO(®)-catheter, were enrolled. Patients were then divided into two groups: Group I was provided with a CVC in the contralateral (CVCcontra) and Group II in the ipsilateral (CVCipsi) inferior vena cava. Thermodilution via injection of ice-cold saline was then performed via CVCsup and CVCinf. Bland-Altman analysis for cardiac index (CI), extra-vascular lung water index (EVLWI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were employed. Additional correction formulas for femorally assed parameters were determined. In a total of 28 patients, bias (limits of agreement) for measurements of CI in CVCcontra was found to be +0.2 (-0.4; +0.9) and +0.3 (-0.4; +1.0) L/min/m(2) in CVCipsi. GEDVI showed a bias of +274.8 (-47.3; +596.9) mL/m(2) in CVCcontra and +274.7 (-100.7; +650.1) mL/m(2) in CVCipsi. The mean EVLWI were 9.4 ± 4.3 mL/kg for EVLWIVCS and 10.7 ± 5.2 mL/kg for EVLWIinf. The LoA yielded at -3.4 and +6.1 mL/kg with a bias of +1.3 mL/kg. Percentage errors revealed clinically acceptable limits for CI and GEDVI, but not for EVLWI. Using TPTD via an infracardial central vein, measurements of CI showed high accuracy and precision while GEDVI measurements were precise with a lower accuracy, irrespective of the position of the infracardial CVC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac index; Extra-vascular lung water index; Global end-diastolic volume index; Intensive care; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341509     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9762-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  27 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Monitoring right-to-left intracardiac shunt in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Sami Alaya; Farisa Medkour
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Extravascular lung water determined with single transpulmonary thermodilution correlates with the severity of sepsis-induced acute lung injury.

Authors:  Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Mikhail Y Kirov; Mikhail A Sovershaev; Vladimir N Kuklin; Evgeny V Suborov; Kristine Waerhaug; Lars J Bjertnaes
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Thermal-dye lung water measurements: effects of edema and embolization.

Authors:  L Oppenheimer; V B Elings; F R Lewis
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Simon W Chong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Extravascular lung water measurement using transpulmonary thermodilution in children.

Authors:  Joris Lemson; Ad P Backx; Anton M van Oort; Tijn P W J M Bouw; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Intravascular volume monitoring and extravascular lung water in septic patients with pulmonary edema.

Authors:  Sandrine Boussat; Thierry Jacques; Bruno Levy; Evelyne Laurent; Antoine Gache; Gilles Capellier; Alain Neidhardt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Volume assessment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: a comparison of intrathoracic blood volume index, central venous pressure, and hematocrit, and their correlation to cardiac index and extravascular lung water index.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Andreas Umgelter; Wolfgang Reindl; Michael Franzen; Christian Schmidt; Stefan von Delius; Fabian Geisler; Florian Eckel; Ralph Fritsch; Jens Siveke; Benedikt Henschel; Roland M Schmid
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Parienti; Marina Thirion; Bruno Mégarbane; Bertrand Souweine; Abdelali Ouchikhe; Andrea Polito; Jean-Marie Forel; Sophie Marqué; Benoît Misset; Norair Airapetian; Claire Daurel; Jean-Paul Mira; Michel Ramakers; Damien du Cheyron; Xavier Le Coutour; Cédric Daubin; Pierre Charbonneau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Hemodynamic monitoring over the past 10 years.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Retrospective analysis of central venous catheters in elective intracranial surgery - Is there any benefit?

Authors:  Benjamin Löser; Olga Recio Ariza; Alexander März; Anastassia Löser; Jörn Grensemann; Martin Petzoldt; Daniel A Reuter; Frank Weber; Änne Glass; Sebastian A Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.