Literature DB >> 26339275

Overview of Risk Management for Engineered Nanomaterials.

P A Schulte1, C L Geraci1, L L Hodson1, R D Zumwalde1, E D Kuempel1, V Murashov1, K F Martinez1, D S Heidel1.   

Abstract

Occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is considered a new and challenging occurrence. Preliminary information from laboratory studies indicates that workers exposed to some kinds of ENMs could be at risk of adverse health effects. To protect the nanomaterial workforce, a precautionary risk management approach is warranted and given the newness of ENMs and emergence of nanotechnology, a naturalistic view of risk management is useful. Employers have the primary responsibility for providing a safe and healthy workplace. This is achieved by identifying and managing risks which include recognition of hazards, assessing exposures, characterizing actual risk, and implementing measures to control those risks. Following traditional risk management models for nanomaterials is challenging because of uncertainties about the nature of hazards, issues in exposure assessment, questions about appropriate control methods, and lack of occupational exposure limits (OELs) or nano-specific regulations. In the absence of OELs specific for nanomaterials, a precautionary approach has been recommended in many countries. The precautionary approach entails minimizing exposures by using engineering controls and personal protective equipment (PPE). Generally, risk management utilizes the hierarchy of controls. Ideally, risk management for nanomaterials should be part of an enterprise-wide risk management program or system and this should include both risk control and a medical surveillance program that assesses the frequency of adverse effects among groups of workers exposed to nanomaterials. In some cases, the medical surveillance could include medical screening of individual workers to detect early signs of work-related illnesses. All medical surveillance should be used to assess the effectiveness of risk management; however, medical surveillance should be considered as a second line of defense to ensure that implemented risk management practices are effective.

Year:  2013        PMID: 26339275      PMCID: PMC4556602          DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser        ISSN: 1742-6588


  25 in total

1.  Progression of occupational risk management with advances in nanomaterials.

Authors:  Vladimir Murashov; Paul Schulte; John Howard
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Control banding approaches for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Derk H Brouwer
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-07

Review 3.  Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Charles L Geraci; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control.

Authors:  E D Kuempel; V Castranova; C L Geraci; P A Schulte
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Proinflammogenic effects of low-toxicity and metal nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro: highlighting the role of particle surface area and surface reactivity.

Authors:  Rodger Duffin; Lang Tran; David Brown; Vicki Stone; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 6.  Issues in the development of epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Candis Mayweather; Charles L Geraci; Ralph Zumwalde; John L McKernan
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Development of a French epidemiological surveillance system of workers producing or handling engineered nanomaterials in the workplace.

Authors:  Odile Boutou-Kempf; Jean-Luc Marchand; Anca Radauceanu; Olivier Witschger; Ellen Imbernon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Evaluation of information in nanomaterial safety data sheets and development of international standard for guidance on preparation of nanomaterial safety data sheets.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Won Kwen Kuk; Miran Kwon; Jong Han Lee; Kwon Sub Lee; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 9.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Ethical and scientific issues of nanotechnology in the workplace.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Fabio Salamanca-Buentello
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.

Authors:  Kevin H Dunn; Adrienne C Eastlake; Michael Story; Eileen D Kuempel
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 2.  Opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology in the green economy.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Veruscka Leso; Walter Ricciardi; Laura L Hodson; Mark D Hoover
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Veruscka Leso; Marco Piacci; Dante Luigi Cioffi; Irina Guseva Canu; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.