Literature DB >> 22752094

Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.

Eileen D Kuempel1, Charles L Geraci, Paul A Schulte.   

Abstract

In the last decade since the rise in occupational safety and health (OSH) research focusing on nanomaterials, some progress has been made in generating the health effects and exposure data needed to perform risk assessment and develop risk management guidance. Yet, substantial research gaps remain, as do challenges in the translation of these research findings to OSH guidance and workplace practice. Risk assessment is a process that integrates the hazard, exposure, and dose-response data to characterize risk in a population (e.g. workers), in order to provide health information needed for risk management decision-making. Thus, the research priorities for risk assessment are those studies that will reduce the uncertainty in the key factors that influence the estimates. Current knowledge of OSH in nanotechnology includes the following: (i) nanomaterials can be measured using standard measurement methods (respirable mass or number concentration), (ii) workplace exposures to nanomaterials can be reduced using engineering controls and personal protective equipment, and (iii) current toxicity testing and risk assessment methods are applicable to nanomaterials. Yet, to ensure protection of workers' health, research is still needed to develop (i) sensitive and quantitative measures of workers' exposure to nanomaterials, (ii) validation methods for exposure controls, and (iii) standardized criteria to categorize hazard data, including better prediction of chronic effects. This article provides a state-of-the-art overview on translating current hazard research data and risk assessment methods for nanomaterials to the development and implementation of effective risk management guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752094     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mes040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  19 in total

1.  Overview of Risk Management for Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C L Geraci; L L Hodson; R D Zumwalde; E D Kuempel; V Murashov; K F Martinez; D S Heidel
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Long-term monitoring for nanomedicine implants and drugs.

Authors:  Michaela Kendall; Iseult Lynch
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Modeling of occupational exposure to accidentally released manufactured nanomaterials in a production facility and calculation of internal doses by inhalation.

Authors:  Marika Pilou; Celina Vaquero-Moralejo; María Jaén; Jesús Lopez De Ipiña Peña; Panagiotis Neofytou; Christos Housiadas
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-09-27

5.  Taking stock of the occupational safety and health challenges of nanotechnology: 2000-2015.

Authors:  P A Schulte; G Roth; L L Hodson; V Murashov; M D Hoover; R Zumwalde; E D Kuempel; C L Geraci; A B Stefaniak; V Castranova; J Howard
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.

Authors:  Nicole M Neu-Baker; Adrienne Eastlake; Laura Hodson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Carcinogenic Potential of High Aspect Ratio Carbon Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Sudjit Luanpitpong; Liying Wang; Donna C Davidson; Heimo Riedel; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 8.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  A E Nel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Li-Ming Lo; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.

Authors:  James Hanlon; Karen S Galea; Steven Verpaele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.