| Literature DB >> 26339267 |
Manish V Patel1, Kalapi B Patel2, Shivenarain Gupta1, Andreas Michalsen3, Elmar Stapelfeldt3, Christian S Kessler3.
Abstract
Hepatic cirrhosis is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, especially if complicated by ascites. This chronic condition can be related to the classical disease entity jalodara in Traditional Indian Medicine (Ayurveda). The present paper aims to evaluate the general potential of Ayurvedic therapy for overall clinical outcomes in hepatic cirrhosis complicated by ascites (HCcA). In form of a nonrandomized, uncontrolled, single group, open-label observational clinical study, 56 patients fulfilling standardized diagnostic criteria for HCcA were observed during their treatment at the P. D. Patel Ayurveda Hospital, Nadiad, India. Based on Ayurvedic tradition, a standardized treatment protocol was developed and implemented, consisting of oral administration of single and compound herbal preparations combined with purificatory measures as well as dietary and lifestyle regimens. The outcomes were assessed by measuring liver functions through specific clinical features and laboratory parameters and by evaluating the Child-Pugh prognostic grade score. After 6 weeks of treatment and a follow-up period of 18 weeks, the outcomes showed statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements. Further larger and randomized trials on effectiveness, safety, and quality of the Ayurvedic approach in the treatment of HCcA are warranted to support these preliminary findings.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26339267 PMCID: PMC4539059 DOI: 10.1155/2015/613182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Dose pattern of Piper longum Linn.
| Day | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose [g] twice daily | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Treatment protocol for Ayurvedic drugs.
| Number | Botanical name | Ayurvedic name | Content ratio | Part used | Form | Dose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Compound decoction |
| Various | Coarse powder/decoction | 10 g/40 mL | |
| (a) |
|
| 1 part | Whole plant | Coarse powder | |
| (b) |
|
| 1 part | Whole plant | Coarse powder | |
| (c) |
|
| 1 part | Root | Coarse powder | |
| (d) |
|
| 1 part | Rhizome | Coarse powder | |
| (e) |
|
| 1 part | Bark | Coarse powder | |
| (f) |
|
| 1 part | Stem | Coarse powder | |
| (g) |
|
| 1 part | Rhizome | Coarse powder | |
| (h) |
|
| 1 part | Root | Coarse powder | |
|
| ||||||
| (2) | Compound powder | Fine powder | 5.5 g | |||
| (a) |
|
| Root | Fine powder | 2 g | |
| (b) |
|
| Whole plant | Fine powder | 3 g | |
| (c) | Herbomineral combination |
| Ultrafine powder (ash) | 0.5 g | ||
| (I) | Ammonium chloride [NH4Cl] |
| 1 part | Ultrafine powder (ash) | ||
| (II) | Potassium nitrate [KNO3] |
| 16 parts | Ultrafine powder (ash) | ||
| (III) | Potash alum [KAl(SO4)212H2O] |
| 2 parts | Ultrafine powder (ash) | ||
|
| ||||||
| (3) |
|
| Whole plant | Fine powder | 3 g | |
Timeline of the study.
| Phase | Event | Measure | Week |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prephase | Screening | (i) Inclusion and exclusion criteria | Week 0 |
| Main observation period (IPD) | Baseline visit (V0) | (i) Clinical and laboratory investigations | Week 1 |
| Phase 1 | (i) | Weeks 1 & 2 | |
| Phase 2 | (i) Purgation | Week 2 | |
| Phase 3 | (i) Drug administration | Weeks 3–6 | |
| First visit (V1) | (i) Clinical and laboratory investigations | Week 7 | |
| Follow-up (OPD) | (i) Continued drug administration | Weeks 7–24 | |
| Second visit (V2) | (i) Clinical and laboratory investigations | Week 24 |
Assessed clinical features' score (Grade 0–3).
| Number | Symptom | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Oedema | No oedema | Slight oedema on lower extremities | Severe oedema on lower extremities | Anasarca |
| (2) | Loss of appetite | Good appetite | Mild loss of appetite | Moderate loss of appetite | Complete loss of appetite |
| (3) | General weakness | No weakness | Mild weakness | Moderate weakness | Severe weakness |
| (4) | Nausea and vomiting | Absent | Occasional | Once or twice a week | Daily |
| (5) | Abdominal girth [cm] | Grading per [cm]-scale | |||
| (6) | Urine output [L/day] | Grading per [L]-scale | |||
Baseline (V0) characteristics: underlying causes of HCcA (n = 68).
| Basic cause (diagnosis) | Number of patients | Percentage [%] |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged alcohol consumption | 26 | 38 |
| Alcohol and Hepatitis B | 6 | 9 |
| Hepatitis B | 8 | 12 |
| Hepatitis C | 2 | 3 |
| Cryptogenic cirrhosis | 26 | 38 |
Changes in clinical symptoms from baseline (V0) to week 7 (V1).
| Number | Symptom score | Mean score | Improvement [%] |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (V0) | Week 7 (V1) | ||||
| (1) | Oedema score | 2.01 ± 0.68 | 0.33 ± 0.57 | 83.87 ± 0.62 | <0.001 |
| (2) | Loss of appetite score | 2.62 ± 0.53 | 0.92 ± 0.52 | 64.70 ± 0.51 | <0.001 |
| (3) | General weakness score | 2.67 ± 0.47 | 1.21 ± 0.5 | 54.67 ± 0.58 | <0.001 |
| (4) | Nausea and vomiting score | 1.29 ± 0.59 | 0.12 ± 0.33 | 90.90 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
| (5) | Abdominal girth [cm] | 89.9 ± 10.6 | 72.1 ± 9.76 | 19.7 ± 7.17 | <0.001 |
| (6) | Urine output [liter/per day] | 0.45 ± 0.29 | 1.63 ± 0.58 | 266.32 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
Changes in clinical laboratory: baseline (V0), week 7 (V1), and follow-up (V2).
| Investigation | Mean score | Improvement in percent [%] |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (V0) | Week 7 (V1) | After 6 months (V2) | After Week 7 (V1) | Between V1 and V2 | ||
| Serum bilirubin [mg/dL] | 3.74 ± 4.59 | 1.25 ± 1.31 | 0.94 ± 0.63 | 66.5 ± 4.04 | 25.63 ± 0.70 | <0.001 |
| Serum albumin [g/dL] | 2.71 ± 0.67 | 3.32 ± 0.45 | 3.43 ± 0.28 | 22.43 ± 0.54 | 3.27 ± 0.29 | <0.001 |
| Serum albumin/serum globulin [A/G] | 0.73 ± 0.20 | 1.03 ± 0.20 | 1.17 ± 0.17 | 40.65 ± 0.19 | 13.33 ± 0.17 | <0.001 |
| Serum alkaline phosphatase [IU/L] | 318.3 ± 102.2 | 210.8 ± 53.05 | 192.15 ± 29.42 | 33.8 ± 76.37 | 8.37 ± 30.60 | <0.001 |
| Serum globulin [g/dL] | 3.77 ± 0.62 | 3.27 ± 0.43 | 2.96 ± 0.32 | 13.3 ± 0.51 | 9.33 ± 0.37 | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin [g/dL] | 8.78 ± 1.90 | 10.36 ± 1.52 | 11.33 ± 1.47 | 17.98 ± 0.93 | 9.36 ± 1.06 | <0.001 |
| Serum GPT [IU/L] | 58.41 ± 44.38 | 40.62 ± 27.6 | 30.62 ± 9.07 | 30.5 ± 27.39 | 24.60 ± 21.62 | <0.001 |
| Serum GOT [IU/L] | 84.52 ± 50.52 | 52.6 ± 31.21 | 44.27 ± 21.81 | 37.8 ± 34.92 | 14.67 ± 14.63 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Effect on prognosis according to Child-Pugh grade score: overall change (n = 56).