Literature DB >> 10712474

Afferent roles in hindlimb wipe-reflex trajectories: free-limb kinematics and motor patterns.

W J Kargo1, S F Giszter.   

Abstract

The hindlimb wiping reflex of the frog is an example of a targeted trajectory that is organized at the spinal level. In this paper, we examine this reflex in 45 spinal frogs to test the importance of proprioceptive afferents in trajectory formation at the spinal level. We tested hindlimb to hindlimb wiping, in which the wiping or effector limb and the target limb move together. Loss of afferent feedback from the wiping limb was produced by cutting dorsal roots 7-9. This caused altered initial trajectory direction, increased ankle path curvature, knee-joint velocity reversals, and overshooting misses of the target limb. We established that these kinematic and motor-pattern changes were due mainly to the loss of ipsilateral muscular and joint afferents. Loss of cutaneous afferents alone did not alter the initial trajectory up to target limb contact. However, there were cutaneous effects in later motor-pattern phases after the wiping and target limb had made contact: The knee extension or whisk phase of wiping was often lost. Finally, there was a minor and nonspecific excitatory effect of phasic contralateral feedback in the motor-pattern changes after deafferentation. Specific muscle groups were altered as a result of proprioceptive loss. These muscles also showed configuration-based regulation during wiping. Biceps, semitendinosus, and sartorius (all contributing knee flexor torques) all were regulated in amplitude based on the initial position of the limb. These muscles contributed to an initial electromyographic (EMG) burst in the motor pattern. Rectus internus and semimembranosus (contributing hip extensor torques) were regulated in onset but not in the time of peak EMG or in termination of EMG based on initial position. These two muscles contributed to a second EMG burst in the motor pattern. After deafferentation the initial burst was reduced and more synchronous with the second burst, and the second burst often was broadened in duration. Ankle path curvature and its degree of change after loss of proprioception depended on the degree of joint staggering used by the frog (i.e., the relative phasing between knee and hip motion) and on the degree of motor-pattern change. We examined these variations in 31 frogs. Twenty percent (6/31) of frogs showed largely synchronous joint coordination and little effect of deafferentation on joint coordination, end-point path, or the underlying synchronous motor pattern. Eighty percent of frogs (25/31) showed some degree of staggered joint coordination and also strong effects of loss of afferents. Loss of afferents caused two major joint level changes in these frogs: collapse of joint phasing into synchronous joint motion and increased hip velocity. Fifty percent of frogs (16/31) showed joint-coordination changes of type (1) without type (2). This change was associated with reduction, loss, or collapse of phasing of the sartorius, semitendinosus and biceps (iliofibularis) in the initial EMG burst in the motor pattern. The remaining 30% (9/31) of frogs showed both joint-coordination changes 1 and 2. These changes were associated with both the knee flexor EMG changes seen in the other frogs and with additional increased activity of rectus internus and semimembranosus muscles. Our data show that multiple ipsilateral modalities all play some role in regulating muscle activity patterns in the wiping limb. Our data support a strong role of ipsilateral proprioception in the process of trajectory formation and specifically in the control of limb segment interactions during wiping by way of the regulation and coordination of muscle groups based on initial limb configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712474     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Rapid correction of aimed movements by summation of force-field primitives.

Authors:  W J Kargo; S F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Three-dimensional model of the feline hindlimb.

Authors:  Thomas J Burkholder; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.804

3.  Robustness of muscle synergies underlying three-dimensional force generation at the hand in healthy humans.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intrinsic musculoskeletal properties stabilize wiping movements in the spinalized frog.

Authors:  Andrew G Richardson; Jean-Jacques E Slotine; Emilio Bizzi; Matthew C Tresch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors.

Authors:  Vincent C K Cheung; Andrea d'Avella; Matthew C Tresch; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Asymmetric interjoint feedback contributes to postural control of redundant multi-link systems.

Authors:  Nathan E Bunderson; Lena H Ting; Thomas J Burkholder
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Motor primitives and synergies in the spinal cord and after injury--the current state of play.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Corey B Hart
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Spinal cord modularity: evolution, development, and optimization and the possible relevance to low back pain in man.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Corey B Hart; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.