Ashis Kumar Dhara1, Sudipta Mukhopadhyay2, Pramit Saha3, Mandeep Garg4, Niranjan Khandelwal4. 1. Department of Electronics and Electrical, Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India. 2. Department of Electronics and Electrical, Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India. smukho@gmail.com. 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India. 4. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160023, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Boundary roughness of a pulmonary nodule is an important indication of its malignancy. The irregularity of the shape of a nodule is represented in terms of a few diagnostic characteristics such as spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity. Quantitative characterization of these diagnostic characteristics is essential for designing a content-based image retrieval system and computer-aided system for diagnosis of lung cancer. METHODS: This paper presents differential geometry-based techniques for computation of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity using the binary mask of the segmented nodule. These shape features are computed in 3D considering complete nodule. RESULTS: The performance of the proposed and competing methods is evaluated in terms of the precision, mean similarity, and normalized discounted cumulative gain on 891 nodules of Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative. The proposed methods are comparable to or better than gold standard technique. The reproducibility of proposed feature extraction techniques is evaluated using RIDER coffee break data set. The mean and standard deviation of the percent change of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity are [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] %, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prior works of computation of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity require a set of four ground truths from radiologists and, hence, can not be used in practice. The proposed methods do not require ground truth information of nodules from radiologists, and hence, it can be used in real-life computer-aided diagnosis system for lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Boundary roughness of a pulmonary nodule is an important indication of its malignancy. The irregularity of the shape of a nodule is represented in terms of a few diagnostic characteristics such as spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity. Quantitative characterization of these diagnostic characteristics is essential for designing a content-based image retrieval system and computer-aided system for diagnosis of lung cancer. METHODS: This paper presents differential geometry-based techniques for computation of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity using the binary mask of the segmented nodule. These shape features are computed in 3D considering complete nodule. RESULTS: The performance of the proposed and competing methods is evaluated in terms of the precision, mean similarity, and normalized discounted cumulative gain on 891 nodules of Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative. The proposed methods are comparable to or better than gold standard technique. The reproducibility of proposed feature extraction techniques is evaluated using RIDER coffee break data set. The mean and standard deviation of the percent change of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity are [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] %, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prior works of computation of spiculation, lobulation, and sphericity require a set of four ground truths from radiologists and, hence, can not be used in practice. The proposed methods do not require ground truth information of nodules from radiologists, and hence, it can be used in real-life computer-aided diagnosis system for lung cancer.
Authors: William J Kostis; Anthony P Reeves; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Michael F McNitt-Gray; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Geoffrey McLennan; Richie C Pais; John Freymann; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Peyton H Bland; Gary E Laderach; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Zaid Towfic; David P-Y Qing; David F Yankelevitz; Denise R Aberle; Edwin J R van Beek; Heber MacMahon; Ella A Kazerooni; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Stefan Diederich; Dag Wormanns; Michael Semik; Michael Thomas; Horst Lenzen; Nikolaus Roos; Walter Heindel Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Boon-Keng Teo; Youngho Seo; Stephen L Bacharach; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven K Libutti; Himanshu Shukla; Bruce H Hasegawa; Randall A Hawkins; Benjamin L Franc Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hyun Jung Koo; Mi Young Kim; Ja Hwan Koo; Yu Sub Sung; Jiwon Jung; Sung-Han Kim; Chang-Min Choi; Hwa Jung Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wookjin Choi; Saad Nadeem; Sadegh R Alam; Joseph O Deasy; Allen Tannenbaum; Wei Lu Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 5.428