Literature DB >> 30706153

Risk factors and impact of conversion from VATS to open lobectomy: analysis from a national database.

Stefano Bongiolatti1, Alessandro Gonfiotti2, Domenico Viggiano2, Sara Borgianni2, Leonardo Politi2, Roberto Crisci3, Carlo Curcio4, Luca Voltolini2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to analyse the causes and impact of conversion from VATS to thoracotomy identifying any possible pre-operative risk factors and related consequences.
METHODS: Data from patient who underwent VATS lobectomy (VATS-L) for NSCLC at VATS Group participating centres were retrospectively analysed and divided in two groups: patients treated with VATS-L and patients who suffered from conversion. Predictors of conversion were assessed with univariate and multivariable exact logistic regression. Complications were evaluated as dependent variables of conversion in a Cox multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 4629 patients underwent planned VATS-L for NSCLC and of these, 432 (9.3%) required conversion; the most frequent causes were bleeding (30.4%) and fibro-calcified hilar lymph nodes (23.9%). The independent risk factors at multivariable analysis model were sex male (OR 1.458, p < 0.01), age older than 70 years (OR 1.248, p = 0.036) and the clinically node-positive disease (OR 2.258, p < 0.01). The mortality rate was similar, but the percentage of patients who suffered from any complication (41.7% vs 24.4%, p < 0.01), the complication rate (65% vs 32.2%, p < 0.01), chest tube duration (p < 0.01) and the hospitalisation rate (p < 0.01) were higher for patients converted. Atrial fibrillation (OR 1.471, p = 0.019), prolonged air leak (OR 1.403, p = 0.043), blood transfusions (OR 4.820, p < 0.01), sputum retention (OR 1.80, p = 0.027) and acute kidney failure (OR 2.758, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with conversion at multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversion is associated with increased surgical morbidity, blood loss and hospital stay. Sex male, old age and the clinical involvement of lymph nodes were the strongest predictors of conversion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Conversion; Lobectomy; Lung cancer; Video-assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706153     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06682-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study.

Authors:  Atsushi Watanabe; Tetsuya Koyanagi; Hisayoshi Ohsawa; Tohru Mawatari; Shinji Nakashima; Noriyuki Takahashi; Hiroki Sato; Tomio Abe
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mark W Onaitis; Rebecca P Petersen; Stafford S Balderson; Eric Toloza; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  René H Petersen; Henrik J Hansen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Safety of lymphadenectomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis from a national database.

Authors:  Alessandro Gonfiotti; Alessandro Bertani; Mario Nosotti; Domenico Viggiano; Stefano Bongiolatti; Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Droghetti; Piergiorgio Solli; Roberto Crisci; Luca Voltolini
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Sayf Gazala; Ian Hunt; Azim Valji; Kenneth Stewart; Ericl R Bédard
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-09

6.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer is associated with a lower 30-day morbidity compared with lobectomy by thoracotomy.

Authors:  Lykke Østergaard Laursen; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Tina Kold Jensen; Jesper Ravn; Lars Konge
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz; Marc Puyraveau; Pascal-Alexandre Thomas; Herbert Decaluwe; Martin Hürtgen; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Hansen; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Impact of T status and N status on perioperative outcomes after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Nestor R Villamizar; Marcus Darrabie; Jennifer Hanna; Mark W Onaitis; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy for locally advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer is a feasible and safe approach: analysis from multi-institutional national database.

Authors:  Alessandro Gonfiotti; Stefano Bongiolatti; Luca Bertolaccini; Domenico Viggiano; Piergiorgio Solli; Andrea Droghetti; Alessandro Bertani; Roberto Crisci; Luca Voltolini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-11-07

10.  Development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy program in a single institution: results before and after completion of the learning curve.

Authors:  Alessandro Gonfiotti; Stefano Bongiolatti; Sara Borgianni; Roberto Borrelli; Massimo O Jaus; Leonardo Politi; Giorgia Tancredi; Domenico Viggiano; Luca Voltolini
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  6 in total

1.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy in Bahrain: a case report.

Authors:  Sundus AlMukhodher; Mariam Asheer; Ghassan Alfaqaawi; Osama Bader
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  Risk factors and cancer recurrence associated with postoperative complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Takeo Nakada; Yuki Noda; Daiki Kato; Takamasa Shibasaki; Shohei Mori; Hisatoshi Asano; Hideki Matsudaira; Jun Hirano; Makoto Odaka; Takashi Ohtsuka
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Comparison of the Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Open Thoracotomy for Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Single Cohort Study with 269 Cases.

Authors:  Volkan Erdogu; Hasan Akin; Yasar Sonmezoglu; Ali Cevat Kutluk; Celal Bugra Sezen; Mustafa Vedat Dogru; Ozkan Saydam; Muzaffer Metin
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Estimating the risk of conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery to thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra D Power; Robert E Merritt; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Desmond M D'Souza; Peter J Kneuertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jia Huang; Yu Tian; Qian-Jun Zhou; Jun-Wei Ning; Ze-Nan Gu; Pei-Ji Lu; Jian-Tao Li; Hao Lin; Tian-Xiang Chen; Yun-Hai Yang; Min P Kim; Robert E Merritt; Marco Ghisalberti; Long Jiang; Qing-Quan Luo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12

6.  [Reasons for Conversion to Thoracotomy in 83 Cases during Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy: A Summary of 1,350 Consecutive Operations by A Single Surgical Team].

Authors:  Peng Su; Shiwang Wen; Mingbo Wang; Yanzhao Xu; Huilai Lv; Zhenhua Li; Ziqiang Tian
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.