Andrea L Wendling1, Julie Phillips, William Short, Carrie Fahey, Brian Mavis. 1. A.L. Wendling is associate professor of family medicine and director of rural health curriculum, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan. J. Phillips is associate professor of family medicine and assistant dean for student professional and career development, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan. W. Short is associate professor of family medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, and community assistant dean, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Upper Peninsula Region Campus, Marquette, Michigan. C. Fahey was geographic information science support and research analyst, Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC, at the time of the study. She is now data manager, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California. B. Mavis is associate professor and director, Office of Medical Education Research and Development, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a shortage of primary care and rural physicians in the United States. In 1974, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine (MSU-CHM) created the Rural Physician Program (RPP) to address these issues and increase primary care physicians in Michigan's Upper Peninsula (UP). The authors describe the program and analyze 30 years of outcomes. METHOD: Using American Medical Association Masterfile data, authors performed cross-sectional analysis of all MSU-CHM graduates from 1978 to 2006. Logistic regression was used to compare specialty choice and practice location for RPP graduates and all other MSU-CHM graduates. RPP graduate outcomes were compared over time. RESULTS: In 2011, RPP graduates were more likely to practice primary care (RPP 88/168 [48%]; MSU-CHM 1,143/2,610 [44%]; P = .04), practice a rural high-need specialty (RPP 122/168 [73%]; MSU-CHM 1,612/2,610 [62%]; P = .006), practice in Michigan (RPP 89/168 [53%]; MSU-CHM 1,119/2,610 [43%]; P = .01), practice in the UP region (RPP 44/168 [26%]; MSU-CHM 28/2,610 [1%]; P < .001), practice in a Health Professional Shortage Area (RPP 106/168 [63%]; MSU-CHM 1,279/2,610 [49%]; P < .001), and practice in a rural area (RPP 76/168 [45%]; MSU-CHM 361/2,610 [14%]; P < .001). Percentages of graduates meeting program goals and from the UP region have increased as the program has matured. CONCLUSIONS: Program characteristics, including targeting rurally interested students, primary care focus, and substantial clinical training within a rural region, can successfully foster rural physician careers. The greatest benefit is to the rural region where the program is based.
PURPOSE: There is a shortage of primary care and rural physicians in the United States. In 1974, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine (MSU-CHM) created the Rural Physician Program (RPP) to address these issues and increase primary care physicians in Michigan's Upper Peninsula (UP). The authors describe the program and analyze 30 years of outcomes. METHOD: Using American Medical Association Masterfile data, authors performed cross-sectional analysis of all MSU-CHM graduates from 1978 to 2006. Logistic regression was used to compare specialty choice and practice location for RPP graduates and all other MSU-CHM graduates. RPP graduate outcomes were compared over time. RESULTS: In 2011, RPP graduates were more likely to practice primary care (RPP 88/168 [48%]; MSU-CHM 1,143/2,610 [44%]; P = .04), practice a rural high-need specialty (RPP 122/168 [73%]; MSU-CHM 1,612/2,610 [62%]; P = .006), practice in Michigan (RPP 89/168 [53%]; MSU-CHM 1,119/2,610 [43%]; P = .01), practice in the UP region (RPP 44/168 [26%]; MSU-CHM 28/2,610 [1%]; P < .001), practice in a Health Professional Shortage Area (RPP 106/168 [63%]; MSU-CHM 1,279/2,610 [49%]; P < .001), and practice in a rural area (RPP 76/168 [45%]; MSU-CHM 361/2,610 [14%]; P < .001). Percentages of graduates meeting program goals and from the UP region have increased as the program has matured. CONCLUSIONS: Program characteristics, including targeting rurally interested students, primary care focus, and substantial clinical training within a rural region, can successfully foster rural physician careers. The greatest benefit is to the rural region where the program is based.
Authors: Amelia Goodfellow; Jesus G Ulloa; Patrick T Dowling; Efrain Talamantes; Somil Chheda; Curtis Bone; Gerardo Moreno Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Peter Meyers; Elizabeth Wilkinson; Stephen Petterson; Davis G Patterson; Randall Longenecker; David Schmitz; Andrew Bazemore Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2020-12-04
Authors: Ian T MacQueen; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Gina Capra; Laura Raaen; Jesus G Ulloa; Paul G Shekelle; Isomi Miake-Lye; Jessica M Beroes; Susanne Hempel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.128