Literature DB >> 26330955

Results of Corrective Osteotomy and Treatment Strategy for Ankylosing Spondylitis with Kyphotic Deformity.

Ki-Tack Kim1, Dae-Hyun Park2, Sang-Hun Lee1, Jung-Hee Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To report the radiological and clinical results after corrective osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Furthermore, this study intended to classify the types of deformity and to suggest appropriate surgical treatment options.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ankylosing spondylitis patients who underwent corrective osteotomy between 1996 and 2009. The radiographic assessments included the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinopelvic alignment parameters, correction angle, correction loss, type of deformity related to the location of the apex, and the craniocervical range of motion (CCROM). The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.
RESULTS: A total of 292 corrective osteotomies were performed in 248 patients with a mean follow-up of 40.1 months (range, 24 to 78 months). There were 183 cases of single pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), 19 cases of multiple Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), 17 cases of PSO + SPO, 14 cases of single SPO, six cases of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR), five cases of PSO + partial pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PPSO), and four cases of PPSO. The mean correction angles were 31.9° ± 11.7° with PSO, 14.3° ± 8.4° with SPO, 38.3° ± 12.7° with PVCR, and 19.3° ± 7.1° with PPSO. The thoracolumbar type was the most common. The outcome analysis showed a significant improvement in the ODI score (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis revealed that the ODI score improvements correlated significantly with the postoperative SVA and CCROM (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between the clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters. There were 38 surgery-related complications in 25 patients (10.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Corrective osteotomy is an effective method for treating a fixed kyphotic deformity occurring in ankylosing spondylitis, resulting in satisfactory outcomes with acceptable complications. The CCROM and postoperative SVA were important factors in determining the outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankylosing spondylitis; Osteotomy; Sagittal alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330955      PMCID: PMC4553281          DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg        ISSN: 2005-291X


  19 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Benson P Yang; Stephen L Ondra; Larry A Chen; Hee Soo Jung; Tyler R Koski; Sean A Salehi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Ashish Patel; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Kyung-Soo Suk; Yoon-Je Cho; Gyu-Pyo Hong; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  B J Van Royen; A De Gast; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance).

Authors:  K C Booth; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; C R Baldus; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity.

Authors:  Stephen L Ondra; Shaden Marzouk; Tyler Koski; Fernando Silva; Sean Salehi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Christine Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Transpedicular decancellation closed wedge vertebral osteotomy for treatment of fixed flexion deformity of spine in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  N Thiranont; P Netrawichien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  ASKyphoplan: a program for deformity planning in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Barend J van Royen; Famke J Scheerder; Eric Jansen; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Systemic changes associated with quality of life after surgical treatment of kyphotic deformity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jingwei Liu; Nan Kang; Yiqi Zhang; Yong Hai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cervico-thoracic osteotomies for fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Silviu Sabou; Hossein Mehdian; Dritan Pasku; Luca Boriani; Nasir A Quraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The patterns of loss of correction after posterior wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mu Qiao; Bang-Ping Qian; Sai-Hu Mao; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Sagittal Parameters and Efficacy of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Kyphosis Under Different Lumbar Sagittal Morphologies.

Authors:  Peng-Chao Zhang; Qiang Deng; Wei-Bin Sheng; Hai-Long Guo; Mardan Mamat; Yun-Xiao Luo; Shu-Tao Gao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  Research hotspots and trends analysis of ankylosing spondylitis: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis from 2009 to 2018.

Authors:  Miaomiao Liang; Yan Meng; Siming Zhou; Zhengbo Tao; Lin Tao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

6.  Preoperative prediction of sagittal imbalance in kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after one-level three-column osteotomy.

Authors:  Chunguang Duan; Tailin Wu; Jianzhou Luo; Kai Yang; Zili Yang; Jiayi Chen; Zhengji Huang; Zhenjuan Luo; Huiren Tao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Pedicle Morphology of Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients with Thoracolumbar Kyphosis: A Comparison with Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Ji-Chen Huang; Wen-Bin Xuan; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A Preliminary Algorithm Using Spine Measurement Software to Predict Sagittal Alignment Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.

Authors:  Robert K Merrill; Jun S Kim; Dante M Leven; Joshua J Meaike; Joung Heon Kim; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.