Literature DB >> 21071070

Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Pablo E Marchetti1, Sergey Shikanov, Aria A Razmaria, Gregory P Zagaja, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of prostate weight (PW) on probability of positive surgical margin (PSM) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for low-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS: The cohort consisted of 690 men with low-risk prostate cancer (clinical stage T1c, prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score ≤6) who underwent RARP with bilateral nerve-sparing at our institution by 1 of 2 surgeons from 2003 to 2009. PW was obtained from the pathologic specimen. The association between probability of PSM and PW was assessed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A PSM was identified in 105 patients (15.2%). Patients with PSM had significant higher prostate-specific antigen (P = .04), smaller prostates (P = .0001), higher Gleason score (P = .004), and higher pathologic stage (P < .0001). After logistic regression, we found a significant inverse relation between PSM and PW (OR 0.97%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96, 0.99; P = .0003) in univariate analysis. This remained significant in the multivariate model (OR 0.98%; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99; P = .006) adjusting for age, body mass index, surgeon experience, pathologic Gleason score, and pathologic stage. In this multivariate model, the predicted probability of PSM for 25-, 50-, 100-, and 150-g prostates were 22% (95% CI 16%, 30%), 13% (95% CI 11%, 16%), 5% (95% CI 1%, 8%), and 1% (95% CI 0%, 3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower PW is independently associated with higher probability of PSM in low-risk patients undergoing RARP with bilateral nerve-sparing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071070     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Byung Ha Chung; Sung Joon Hong; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Uğur Boylu; Turgay Turan; Cem Başataç; Fikret Fatih Önol; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

3.  Predictive preoperative factors for positive surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Uğur Boylu; Cem Başataç; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

4.  Risk Factors for Intraprostatic Incision into Malignant Glands at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung-Woo Park; Nathaniel Readal; Byong Chang Jeong; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Misop Han
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Population-based averages within PSA and Gleason strata.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Marco A Salazar; Suman Chatterjee; Daniel W Lin; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens.

Authors:  Heng Hong; Lin Mel; Jonathan Taylor; Qiang Wu; Hugh Reeves
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  S Bishara; N Vasdev; T Lane; G Boustead; J Adshead
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arees Damani; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Danielle Crawley; Declan Cahill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.