Literature DB >> 23258076

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 grams versus ≤50 grams: surgical, oncologic and short-term functional outcomes.

Apostolos P Labanaris1, Vahudin Zugor, Jorn H Witt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to evaluate the surgical, oncological and short-term functional outcomes in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 g versus patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≤50 g undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 4,000 men who underwent RARP from February 2006 to April 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 185 men had a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 g (group A). A matched pairs analysis was performed using our database to identify men with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≤50 g but with equivalent clinicopathologic characteristics to serve as the control group (group B).
RESULTS: Our results indicated that although the intraoperative results were more than satisfying in patients with large glands, there is a significant increase in blood loss, operative time needed, increased need for bladder neck reconstruction as well as an increase in intraoperative complications. Nevertheless, patients with large glands exhibit less aggressive tumors, less positive surgical margins and a lower incidence of biochemical recurrence. Regarding functional outcomes, patients with larger glands had no difference regarding continence rates when compared to patients with smaller glands but exhibited significantly lower potency rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Although RARP in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 g is technically challenging, in experienced hands it can be considered a safe procedure with excellent surgical, oncological and functional outcomes. Nevertheless, this conclusion is limited, in that it is from a single institution with a large case volume and may not be reflective of outcomes at centers with smaller volumes and less experience.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23258076     DOI: 10.1159/000342969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Yoshio Ohno; Jun Nakashima; Kenji Shimodaira; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tatsuo Gondo; Makoto Ohori; Masaaki Tachibana; Kunihiko Yoshioka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Uğur Boylu; Turgay Turan; Cem Başataç; Fikret Fatih Önol; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

3.  Perioperative predictors for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Long-term results of a Canadian prospective cohort.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Abdullah M Alenizi; Kevin C Zorn; Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Naif Alhathal; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  S Bishara; N Vasdev; T Lane; G Boustead; J Adshead
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15

5.  Erectile dysfunction in robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes and management.

Authors:  Patrick Whelan; Shahid Ekbal; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

6.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in high prostate volume cases: impact on oncological and functional results.

Authors:  Sciarra Alessandro; Gentilucci Alessandro; Cattarino Susanna; Innocenzi Michele; Di Quilio Francesca; Fasulo Andrea; Magnus Von Heland; Gentile Vincenzo; Salciccia Stefano
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rong Yang; Kai Cao; Tao Han; Yi-Feng Zhang; Gu-Tian Zhang; Lin-Feng Xu; Hui-Bo Lian; Xiao-Gong Li; Hong-Qian Guo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.