Literature DB >> 26328070

Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: a single center experience with 2049 patients.

Ozan Efesoy1, Murat Bozlu2, Selahittin Çayan2, Erdem Akbay2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Currently, transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) systematic prostate biopsy is the standard procedure in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a safe method, it is an invasive procedure that is not free from complications. In this prospective study we evaluated the complications of a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 2049 patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The indications for the prostate biopsy were abnormal digital rectal examination findings and/or an elevated serum total prostate specific antigen (PSA) level (greater than 4 ng/mL). The participants received prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg) the night before and the morning of the biopsy, followed by 500 mg orally twice daily for 2 days. To prevent development of voiding disorders, the patients also received oral alpha blockers for 30 days starting the day before the procedure. A Fleet enema was self-administered the night before the procedure for rectal cleansing. The complications were assessed both 10 days and 1 month after the biopsy.
RESULTS: The mean age, serum total PSA level and prostate volume of the patients were 65.4±9.6 years, 18.6±22.4 ng/mL and 51.3±22.4 cc, respectively. From these 2.042 biopsies, 596 cases (29.1%) were histopathologically diagnosed as prostate adenocarcinoma. Minor complications, such as hematuria (66.3%), hematospermia (38.8%), rectal bleeding (28.4%), mild to moderate degrees of vasovagal episodes (7.7%), and genitourinary tract infection (6.1%) were noted frequently. Major complications were rare and included urosepsis (0.5%), rectal bleeding requiring intervention (0.3%), acute urinary retention (0.3%), hematuria necessitating transfusion (0.05%), Fournier's gangrene (0.05%), and myocardial infarction (0.05%).
CONCLUSION: TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is safe for diagnosing prostate cancer with few major but frequent minor complications. However, patients should be informed and followed-up after biopsy regarding possible complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; complications; prostate; transrectal ultrasound

Year:  2013        PMID: 26328070      PMCID: PMC4548577          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2013.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  16 in total

1.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?

Authors:  Jordi Puig; Anna Darnell; Patricia Bermúdez; Antoni Malet; Guadalupe Serrate; Marisa Baré; Joan Prats
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients.

Authors:  Michael Peyromaure; Vincent Ravery; Aurel Messas; Marianne Toublanc; Lilianne Boccon-Gibod; Laurent Boccon-Gibod
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study.

Authors:  B Djavan; M Waldert; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; C Seitz; M Remzi; A Borkowski; C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program.

Authors:  René Raaijmakers; Wim J Kirkels; Monique J Roobol; Mark F Wildhagen; Fritz H Schrder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Multiple transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies: morbidity and tolerance.

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; V John; G Louras; S Andreas; E Alargof; F Sofras; N Goulandris
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial of 6 versus 12 cores.

Authors:  C K Naughton; D K Ornstein; D S Smith; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluation.

Authors:  P Hammerer; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores.

Authors:  Andreas P Berger; Christian Gozzi; Hannes Steiner; Ferdinand Frauscher; John Varkarakis; Hermann Rogatsch; Georg Bartsch; Wolfgang Horninger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region?

Authors:  Roger Paul; Stefan Schöler; Heiner van Randenborgh; Hubert Kübler; Michael Alschibaja; Raymonde Busch; Rudolf Hartung
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  14 in total

1.  Infective complications in patients after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli colonization in rectal flora.

Authors:  Mustafa Bilal Hamarat; Fatih Tarhan; Rahim Horuz; Gülfem Akengin Öcal; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Alper Kafkaslı; Özgür Yazıcı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  Is there any priority between the alpha blockers on voiding functions after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Ozan Efesoy; Barış Saylam; Mesut Tek; Murat Bozlu; Erdem Akbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 3.  Optimal Use of Tumor-Based Molecular Assays for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Jamil S Syed; Daniel Segal; Syed N Rahman; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Doğan Atılgan; Yusuf Gençten; Engin Kölükçü; Şahin Kılıç; Nihat Uluocak; Bekir Süha Parlaktaş; Fikret Erdemir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

5.  Biparametric MRI and 41 sector map for MRI/Transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy to increase diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Pietro Scialpi; Teresa Pusiol; Alfredo D'andrea
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11

6.  Endoscopic Therapy in the Management of Patients With Severe Rectal Bleeding Following Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Case-Based Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adnan Malik; Rizwan Ishtiaq; Muhammad Hassan Naeem Goraya; Faisal Inayat; Vinaya V Gaduputi
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

7.  Prostate Cancer Screening Trends After United States Preventative Services Task Force Guidelines in an Underserved Population.

Authors:  Neel H Patel; Jonathan Bloom; Joel Hillelsohn; Sean Fullerton; Denton Allman; Gerald Matthews; Majid Eshghi; John L Phillips
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-05-01

8.  Urinary prostate-specific antigen and microseminoprotein-beta levels in men with and without prostate cancer: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Prashant Shrivastava; Harshit Garg; Madhusudan Bhat; Amit Dinda; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

9.  Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.

Authors:  Guan-Lin Huang; Chih-Hsiung Kang; Wei-Ching Lee; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Detection of individual prostate cancer via multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in own material - initial experience.

Authors:  Paweł Porzycki; Ewa Ciszkowicz
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.