Literature DB >> 15017202

Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores.

Andreas P Berger1, Christian Gozzi, Hannes Steiner, Ferdinand Frauscher, John Varkarakis, Hermann Rogatsch, Georg Bartsch, Wolfgang Horninger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the complication rate of ultrasound guided prostate biopsies performed at a single center in a screening population. Moreover the impact of different biopsy protocols comprising varying numbers of biopsy cores on the complication rate was evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 5957 biopsies performed in 4303 clinically healthy men between January 1993 and August 2002 was evaluated retrospectively. Due to changes in the biopsy protocol, the number of biopsies obtained increased with time from 6 cores (January 1993 to October 1995) to 10 (November 1995 to March 2000) to 15 cores (March 2000 to August 2002).
RESULTS: Minor complications such as hematospermia (36.3%), hematuria (14.5%) and rectal bleeding persisting for up to 2 days (2.3%) were noted frequently, while major complications requiring further treatment were far less common. Post-biopsy fever was seen in 48 patients (0.8%), rectal bleeding requiring surgical intervention or persisting for more than 2 days occurred in 36 patients (0.6%) and urinary retention was observed in 12 patients (0.2%). The increase in biopsy cores with time did not result in increased post-biopsy morbidity. Prostate cancer at biopsy was not associated with a higher complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate specific antigen screening has led to an increase in the number of patients undergoing prostate biopsy which, in turn, has increased the incidence of post-biopsy complications. However, most of the complications are minor and self-limiting. In this large study population the increased number of biopsy cores did not result in an increased incidence of major post-biopsy complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017202     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000116449.01186.f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  42 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men.

Authors:  Satoshi Anai; John Pendleton; Peter Wludyka; Christopher Williams; Leah Nelms; Curtis Pettaway; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Prevention and treatment of biopsy-related complications.

Authors:  Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Dipen Parekh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted photoacoustic imaging of prostate cancer in vivo.

Authors:  Haichong K Zhang; Ying Chen; Jeeun Kang; Ala Lisok; Il Minn; Martin G Pomper; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  Biopsy related prostate status does not affect on the clinicopathological outcome of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  The preventive effect of tamsulosin on voiding dysfunction after prostate biopsy: a prospective, open-label, observational study.

Authors:  Seung Jun Chung; Seung Il Jung; Ji Won Ryu; Eu Chang Hwang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Jin Woong Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Management of rising prostate-specific antigen after a negative biopsy.

Authors:  David A Levy; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

Review 8.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Risk factors for acute prostatitis after transrectal biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Sun Il Kim; Hyun Soo Ahn; Jong Bo Choi; Young Soo Kim; Se Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

10.  Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: a single center experience with 2049 patients.

Authors:  Ozan Efesoy; Murat Bozlu; Selahittin Çayan; Erdem Akbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.