Literature DB >> 26324283

Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in neurological function and quality of life after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a prospective cohort study.

Feifei Zhou1, Yilong Zhang1, Yu Sun2, Fengshan Zhang1, Shengfa Pan1, Zhongjun Liu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) concept to postoperative clinical results by using a prospective cohort study in Chinese patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
METHODS: The sample consisted of 113 patients who underwent surgical treatment for CSM in our hospital between February 2008 and November 2012. The preoperative and 1-year postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, mJOA score recovery rate, physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the Short Form 36 were collected. The MCID of each outcome measurement was calculated by four approaches including average change, minimum detectable change, change difference and receiver operating characteristic curve. The responsiveness of each measurement was then analyzed.
RESULTS: The patients presented a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01) postoperatively in mJOA, PCS, and MCS. The MCID calculated by four approaches varied from 4.09 to 9.62 for the PCS, 3.11 to 7.41 for the MCS, 1.25 to 3.07 for mJOA score, and 31.37 to 44.02% for mJOA recovery rate. In addition, the improvement of the mJOA score owned the highest responsiveness of the four outcome measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The threshold value of the MCID was determined by the choice of the assessment approach. In addition, the recovery rate of the mJOA score appeared to be the most valid and responsive measure of effectiveness of surgery in CSM patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Minimum clinically important difference; Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score; Short Form 36

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26324283     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4208-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Takashi Sakou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36.

Authors:  Anoushka Singh; Kanna Gnanalingham; Adrian Casey; Alan Crockard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; A Willan; L E Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; David N Shau; Owoicho Adogwa; William N Anderson; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  Surgical management of cervical degenerative disease: the evidence related to indications, impact, and outcome.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Babak Arvin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

6.  Clinically meaningful differences in pain, disability and quality of life for chronic nonspecific neck pain - a reanalysis of 4 randomized controlled trials of cupping therapy.

Authors:  Romy Lauche; Jost Langhorst; Gustav J Dobos; Holger Cramer
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.446

7.  Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Joseph T King; Kathleen A McGinnis; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Relationship between degree of focal kyphosis correction and neurological outcomes for patients undergoing cervical deformity correction surgery.

Authors:  Matthew J Grosso; Roy Hwang; Thomas Mroz; Edward Benzel; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-04-05

9.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23

10.  How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Jan L Brozek; Gordon H Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  18 in total

1.  Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Authors:  Mitchell Maltenfort; Claudio Díaz-Ledezma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures.

Authors:  Vanessa L Kronzer; Michelle R Jerry; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Troy S Wildes; Sherry L McKinnon; Anshuman Sharma; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Minimum clinically important difference in outcome scores among patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  So Kato; Yasushi Oshima; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Yuki Taniguchi; Sakae Tanaka; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Poorer Preoperative Function Leads to Delayed Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Graham S Goh; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Zhixing Marcus Ling; Chang-Ming Guo; Wai-Mun Yue; Seang-Beng Tan; John Li-Tat Chen; Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Ye Tian; Chu Wang; Xin Lu; Qianyu Zhuang; Huiming Peng; Jianhua Hu; Yu Zhao; Jianxiong Shen; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prevalence and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Reintubation After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Results From the AOSpine North America Multicenter Study on 8887 Patients.

Authors:  Narihito Nagoshi; Michael G Fehlings; Hiroaki Nakashima; Lindsay Tetreault; Jeffrey L Gum; Zachary A Smith; Wellington K Hsu; Chadi A Tannoury; Tony Tannoury; Vincent C Traynelis; Paul M Arnold; Thomas E Mroz; Ziya L Gokaslan; Mohamad Bydon; Anthony F De Giacomo; Bruce C Jobse; Eric M Massicotte; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Assessing change in patient-reported quality of life after elective surgery: protocol for an observational comparison study.

Authors:  Vanessa L Kronzer; Michelle R Jerry; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-05-24

8.  Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Lingjie Zhou; Madhuri Natarajan; Bruce S Miller; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-07-26

9.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy; A Review of the Latest Advances and Future Directions in Management.

Authors:  Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Ali Moghaddamjou; Allan R Martin; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-08-26

10.  The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Min Kyu Park; Sook Joung Lee; Sang Beom Kim; Kyeong Woo Lee; Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun Young Han; Bo Ryun Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.