| Literature DB >> 26323213 |
Yanyan Jiang1, Danny Allen1, Veerle Kersemans1, Aoife M Devery1, Sivan M Bokobza1, Sean Smart1, Anderson J Ryan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tumours can be categorised based on their stromal architecture into tumour vessel and stromal vessel phenotypes, and the phenotypes have been suggested to define tumour response to chronic treatment with a VEGFR2 antibody. However, it is unclear whether the vascular phenotypes of tumours associate with acute vascular response to VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), or whether the early changes in vascular function are associated with subsequent changes in tumour size. This study was sought to address these questions by using xenograft models of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing stromal vessel phenotype (Calu-3) and tumour vessel phenotype (Calu-6), respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Blood perfusion; Cediranib; Hypoxia; NSCLC; Tumour vasculature; VEGF
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26323213 PMCID: PMC4641245 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.08.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lung Cancer ISSN: 0169-5002 Impact factor: 5.705
Fig. 1Distinct vessel phenotypes in NSCLC xenografts and human tumour samples. (A) CD31 immunohistochemistry staining in Calu-3 tumours. (B) CD31 immunohistochemistry staining in Calu-6 tumours. (C) CD31 immunohistochemistry staining in human NSCLC tumours showing a mixed vessel phenotype. (D) Masson's trichrome staining in human NSCLC tumours showing a mixed vessel phenotype. (E) Proportions of vessel phenotypes in human NSCLC tumours. (F) Proportions of vessel phenotypes in xenografts of NSCLC and other cancers grown in nude mice. Phenotypes were scored from CD31 and Masson's trichrome staining. Functional vessels were identified by the presence of intravascular erythrocytes. Arrows and arrow heads indicate vessels and stroma respectively. Scale bars = 100 μm.
Fig. 2Acute vascular response to cediranib treatment in NSCLC xenografts. Mice bearing Calu-3 or Calu-6 tumours were treated with cediranib (6 mg/kg) or vehicle at 0 h and 22 h. DCE-MRI imaging was performed 2 h before the first and 2 h after the second treatment. (A) DCE-MRI analysis of basal tumour perfusion. Calu-3 tumours show significantly higher gadolinium uptake compared to Calu-6 tumours. **P < 0.01 (B) The average IAUC values of Calu-3 xenografts pre- and post-treatment. Compared to the baseline, gadolinium uptake was significantly reduced in Calu-3 tumours by cediranib treatment. ***P < 0.001 (C) The average IAUC values of Calu-6 xenografts pre- and post-treatment. Compared to the baseline, gadolinium uptake was not affected by cediranib in Calu-6 tumours. (D) Representative MRI images from single slides of Calu-3 and Calu-6 tumours pre- and post-cediranib treatment. (E) Tumour H&E histological staining in vehicle- or cediranib- treated Calu-3 and Calu-6 tumours. Acellular regions were widespread in cediranib-treated Calu-3 tumours, but were rare in vehicle-treated Calu-3 tumours. No difference in necrotic fraction between vehicle- and cediranib-treated Calu-6 tumours was noted. Scale bars = 100 μm.
Fig. 3Immunohistochemical detection of tumour hypoxia. Tumour-bearing mice treated with two doses of cediranib or vehicle were sacrificed after DCE-MRI. Tumours were sectioned and hypoxia was identified by CA9 immunohistochemistry. (A) CA9 staining in vehicle or cediranib treated Calu-3 and Calu-6 tumours. Vehicle-treated Calu-3 tumours showed rare CA9 staining, whereas cediranib-treated Calu-3 tumours showed extensive CA9 positive areas. Calu-6 tumours showed similar levels of peri-necrotic staining of CA9 in both vehicle- and cediranib-treated animals. Scale bars = 100 μm. (B) Hypoxic fractions in Calu-3 tumours treated with vehicle or cediranib. ***P < 0.001. (C) Hypoxic fractions in Calu-6 tumours treated with vehicle or cediranib.
Fig. 4Effects of cediranib on tumour growth in Calu-3 and Calu-6 xenograft models. Calu-3 or Calu-6 tumour-bearing mice were treated with either cediranib or vehicle by oral gavage once daily for 5 days. Tumour volumes were measured and growth curves were plotted. (A) Calu-3 tumour growth curves. Cediranib treated Calu-3 tumours showed a significantly smaller tumour size and tumour regression compared to vehicle-treated controls. **P < 0.01. (B) Calu-6 tumour growth curves. Cediranib treated Calu-6 tumours showed a trend towards growth inhibition, but this did not reach statistical significance. ns: not significant.