Literature DB >> 26323041

Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock.

Andréa M C Ventura1, Huei Hsin Shieh, Albert Bousso, Patrícia F Góes, Iracema de Cássia F O Fernandes, Daniela C de Souza, Rodrigo Locatelli Pedro Paulo, Fabiana Chagas, Alfredo E Gilio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to compare the effects of dopamine or epinephrine in severe sepsis on 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were the rate of healthcare-associated infection, the need for other vasoactive drugs, and the multiple organ dysfunction score.
DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial from February 1, 2009, to July 31, 2013.
SETTING: PICU, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS: Consecutive children who are 1 month to 15 years old and met the clinical criteria for fluid-refractory septic shock. Exclusions were receiving vasoactive drug(s) prior to hospital admission, having known cardiac disease, having already participated in the trial during the same hospital stay, refusing to participate, or having do-not-resuscitate orders.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either dopamine (5-10 μg/kg/min) or epinephrine (0.1-0.3 μg/kg/min) through a peripheral or intraosseous line. Patients not reaching predefined stabilization criteria after the maximum dose were classified as treatment failure, at which point the attending physician gradually stopped the study drug and started another catecholamine.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic and laboratory data were recorded. Baseline characteristics were described as proportions and mean (± SD) and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05. Baseline characteristics and therapeutic interventions for the 120 children enrolled (63, dopamine; 57, epinephrine) were similar. There were 17 deaths (14.2%): 13 (20.6%) in the dopamine group and four (7%) in the epinephrine group (p=0.033). Dopamine was associated with death (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.1-37.8; p=0.037) and healthcare-associated infection (odds ratio, 67.7; 95% CI, 5.0-910.8; p=0.001). The use of epinephrine was associated with a survival odds ratio of 6.49.
CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death and healthcare-associated infection. Early administration of peripheral or intraosseous epinephrine was associated with increased survival in this population. Limitations should be observed while interpreting these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26323041     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  37 in total

1.  Global Case-Fatality Rates in Pediatric Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bobby Tan; Judith Ju-Ming Wong; Rehena Sultana; Janine Cynthia Jia Wen Koh; Mark Jit; Yee Hui Mok; Jan Hau Lee
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 2.  The intensive care medicine clinical research agenda in paediatrics.

Authors:  Mark J Peters; Andrew Argent; Marino Festa; Stéphane Leteurtre; Jefferson Piva; Ann Thompson; Douglas Willson; Pierre Tissières; Marisa Tucci; Jacques Lacroix
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Crystalloid Fluid Choice and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Scott L Weiss; Luke Keele; Fran Balamuth; Neika Vendetti; Rachael Ross; Julie C Fitzgerald; Jeffrey S Gerber
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Primary Outcome Measures in Pediatric Septic Shock Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kusum Menon; James Dayre McNally; Jerry J Zimmerman; Michael S D Agus; Katie O'Hearn; R Scott Watson; Hector R Wong; Mark Duffett; David Wypij; Karen Choong
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 5.  Brain-related outcome measures in trials recruiting critically-ill children.

Authors:  Ericka L Fink; Robert C Tasker
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 6.  2016 Update for the Rogers' Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care: Recognition and Initial Management of Shock.

Authors:  Julie C Fitzgerald; Scott L Weiss; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  What's new in PICU in resource limited settings?

Authors:  Andrew C Argent; Mohammod J Chisti; Suchitra Ranjit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock: Executive Summary.

Authors:  Alan L Davis; Joseph A Carcillo; Rajesh K Aneja; Andreas J Deymann; John C Lin; Trung C Nguyen; Regina S Okhuysen-Cawley; Monica S Relvas; Ranna A Rozenfeld; Peter W Skippen; Bonnie J Stojadinovic; Eric A Williams; Tim S Yeh; Fran Balamuth; Joe Brierley; Allan R de Caen; Ira M Cheifetz; Karen Choong; Edward Conway; Timothy Cornell; Allan Doctor; Marc-Andre Dugas; Jonathan D Feldman; Julie C Fitzgerald; Heidi R Flori; James D Fortenberry; Ana Lia Graciano; Bruce M Greenwald; Mark W Hall; Yong Yun Han; Lynn J Hernan; Jose E Irazuzta; Elizabeth Iselin; Elise W van der Jagt; Howard E Jeffries; Saraswati Kache; Chhavi Katyal; Niranjan Kissoon; Alexander A Kon; Martha C Kutko; Graeme MacLaren; Timothy Maul; Renuka Mehta; Fola Odetola; Kristine Parbuoni; Raina Paul; Mark J Peters; Suchitra Ranjit; Karin E Reuter-Rice; Eduardo J Schnitzler; Halden F Scott; Adalberto Torres; Jacki Weingarten-Abrams; Scott L Weiss; Jerry J Zimmerman; Aaron L Zuckerberg
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Metabolic resuscitation in sepsis: a necessary step beyond the hemodynamic?

Authors:  Heitor Pons Leite; Lúcio Flávio Peixoto de Lima
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Pediatric Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Ian K Maconochie; Richard Aickin; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Robert Bingham; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kee-Chong Ng; Gabrielle A Nuthall; Gene Y K Ong; Amelia G Reis; Stephen M Schexnayder; Barnaby R Scholefield; Janice A Tijssen; Jerry P Nolan; Peter T Morley; Patrick Van de Voorde; Arno L Zaritsky; Allan R de Caen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.