Scott L Weiss1, Luke Keele2, Fran Balamuth3, Neika Vendetti4, Rachael Ross4, Julie C Fitzgerald5, Jeffrey S Gerber6. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: WeissS@email.chop.edu. 2. McCourt School of Public Policy and Department of Government, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 3. Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 5. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that resuscitation with balanced fluids (lactated Ringer [LR]) is associated with improved outcomes compared with normal saline (NS) in pediatric sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: We performed matched analyses using data from 12 529 patients <18 years of age with severe sepsis/septic shock at 382 US hospitals between 2000 and 2013 to compare outcomes with vs without LR as part of initial resuscitation. Patients receiving LR were matched 1:1 to patients receiving only NS (NS group), including separate matches for any (LR-any group) or exclusive (LR-only group) LR use. Outcomes included 30-day hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, new dialysis, and length of stay. RESULTS: The LR-any group was older, received larger crystalloid volumes, and was less likely to have malignancies than the NS group. After matching, mortality was not different between LR-any (7.2%) and NS (7.9%) groups (risk ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.98, 1.01; P = .20). There were no differences in secondary outcomes except longer hospital length of stay in LR-any group (absolute difference 2.4, 95% CI 1.4, 5.0 days; P < .001). Although LR was preferentially used as adjunctive fluid with large-volume resuscitation or first-line fluid in patients with lower illness severity, outcomes were not different after matching stratified by volume and proportionate LR utilization, including for patients in the LR-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Balanced fluid resuscitation with LR was not associated with improved outcomes compared with NS in pediatric sepsis. Although the current practice of NS resuscitation is justified, selective LR use necessitates a prospective trial to definitively determine comparative effectiveness among crystalloids.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that resuscitation with balanced fluids (lactated Ringer [LR]) is associated with improved outcomes compared with normal saline (NS) in pediatric sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: We performed matched analyses using data from 12 529 patients <18 years of age with severe sepsis/septic shock at 382 US hospitals between 2000 and 2013 to compare outcomes with vs without LR as part of initial resuscitation. Patients receiving LR were matched 1:1 to patients receiving only NS (NS group), including separate matches for any (LR-any group) or exclusive (LR-only group) LR use. Outcomes included 30-day hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, new dialysis, and length of stay. RESULTS: The LR-any group was older, received larger crystalloid volumes, and was less likely to have malignancies than the NS group. After matching, mortality was not different between LR-any (7.2%) and NS (7.9%) groups (risk ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.98, 1.01; P = .20). There were no differences in secondary outcomes except longer hospital length of stay in LR-any group (absolute difference 2.4, 95% CI 1.4, 5.0 days; P < .001). Although LR was preferentially used as adjunctive fluid with large-volume resuscitation or first-line fluid in patients with lower illness severity, outcomes were not different after matching stratified by volume and proportionate LR utilization, including for patients in the LR-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Balanced fluid resuscitation with LR was not associated with improved outcomes compared with NS in pediatric sepsis. Although the current practice of NS resuscitation is justified, selective LR use necessitates a prospective trial to definitively determine comparative effectiveness among crystalloids.
Authors: Bram Rochwerg; Waleed Alhazzani; Anees Sindi; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Lehana Thabane; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Wojciech Szczeklik; Fayez Alshamsi; Sultan Altayyar; Wang-Chun Ip; Guowei Li; Michael Wang; Anna Wludarczyk; Qi Zhou; Gordon H Guyatt; Deborah J Cook; Roman Jaeschke; Djillali Annane Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Feihu Zhou; Zhi-Yong Peng; Jeffery V Bishop; Matthew E Cove; Kai Singbartl; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nor'azim Mohd Yunos; Rinaldo Bellomo; Colin Hegarty; David Story; Lisa Ho; Michael Bailey Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul Young; Michael Bailey; Richard Beasley; Seton Henderson; Diane Mackle; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Jan Mehrtens; John Myburgh; Alex Psirides; Sumeet Reddy; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Fran Balamuth; Marlena Kittick; Peter McBride; Ashley L Woodford; Nicole Vestal; T Charles Casper; Melissa Metheney; Katherine Smith; Natalie J Atkin; Jill M Baren; J Michael Dean; Nathan Kuppermann; Scott L Weiss Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Mark J Peters; Waleed Alhazzani; Michael S D Agus; Heidi R Flori; David P Inwald; Simon Nadel; Luregn J Schlapbach; Robert C Tasker; Andrew C Argent; Joe Brierley; Joseph Carcillo; Enitan D Carrol; Christopher L Carroll; Ira M Cheifetz; Karen Choong; Jeffry J Cies; Andrea T Cruz; Daniele De Luca; Akash Deep; Saul N Faust; Claudio Flauzino De Oliveira; Mark W Hall; Paul Ishimine; Etienne Javouhey; Koen F M Joosten; Poonam Joshi; Oliver Karam; Martin C J Kneyber; Joris Lemson; Graeme MacLaren; Nilesh M Mehta; Morten Hylander Møller; Christopher J L Newth; Trung C Nguyen; Akira Nishisaki; Mark E Nunnally; Margaret M Parker; Raina M Paul; Adrienne G Randolph; Suchitra Ranjit; Lewis H Romer; Halden F Scott; Lyvonne N Tume; Judy T Verger; Eric A Williams; Joshua Wolf; Hector R Wong; Jerry J Zimmerman; Niranjan Kissoon; Pierre Tissieres Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Fran Balamuth; Cary W Thurm; Kevin J Downes; Julie C Fitzgerald; Benjamin L Laskin Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ian K Maconochie; Richard Aickin; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Robert Bingham; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kee-Chong Ng; Gabrielle A Nuthall; Gene Y K Ong; Amelia G Reis; Stephen M Schexnayder; Barnaby R Scholefield; Janice A Tijssen; Jerry P Nolan; Peter T Morley; Patrick Van de Voorde; Arno L Zaritsky; Allan R de Caen Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Fran Balamuth; Elliot Long; Graham C Thompson; Katie L Hayes; Hannah Katcoff; Marlena Cook; Elena Tsemberis; Christopher P Hickey; Amanda Williams; Sarah Williamson-Urquhart; Meredith L Borland; Stuart R Dalziel; Ben Gelbart; Stephen B Freedman; Franz E Babl; Jing Huang; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: Trials Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Anab Rebecca Lehr; Soha Rached-d'Astous; Nick Barrowman; Anne Tsampalieros; Melissa Parker; Lauralyn McIntyre; Margaret Sampson; Kusum Menon Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.971