Literature DB >> 26322687

Limits on perceptual encoding can be predicted from known receptive field properties of human visual cortex.

Michael A Cohen1, Juliana Y Rhee2, George A Alvarez3.   

Abstract

Human cognition has a limited capacity that is often attributed to the brain having finite cognitive resources, but the nature of these resources is usually not specified. Here, we show evidence that perceptual interference between items can be predicted by known receptive field properties of the visual cortex, suggesting that competition within representational maps is an important source of the capacity limitations of visual processing. Across the visual hierarchy, receptive fields get larger and represent more complex, high-level features. Thus, when presented simultaneously, high-level items (e.g., faces) will often land within the same receptive fields, while low-level items (e.g., color patches) will often not. Using a perceptual task, we found long-range interference between high-level items, but only short-range interference for low-level items, with both types of interference being weaker across hemifields. Finally, we show that long-range interference between items appears to occur primarily during perceptual encoding and not during working memory maintenance. These results are naturally explained by the distribution of receptive fields and establish a link between perceptual capacity limits and the underlying neural architecture. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26322687     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Julie C Helmers; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Conscious access in the near absence of attention: critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Julian Matthews; Pia Schröder; Lisandro Kaunitz; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

6.  Binocular disparity can augment the capacity of vision without affecting subjective experience of depth.

Authors:  Henry Railo; Joni Saastamoinen; Sipi Kylmälä; Aapo Peltola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.