José Luis Domínguez Jiménez1, Antonio Fernández Suárez2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alto Guadalquivir Healthcare Agency, Alto Guadalquivir Hospital, Blas Infante Ave, Andújar, Jaén, 23740, Spain. jldominguezjim@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Biotechnology, Alto Guadalquivir Healthcare Agency, Alto Guadalquivir Hospital, Andújar, Jaén, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lactose tolerance test is a classic method for the study of lactose malabsorption. However, the methodology used has not been standardized, and this leads to differences in results. AIM: The aim of this report was to analyze whether capillary blood glucose measurement is in agreement with venous blood glucose when performing lactose tolerance test. METHODS: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with suspected lactose malabsorption who had lactose tolerance test performed in venous and capillary blood simultaneously, using a load of 50 g lactose. Agreement was measured using the concordance correlation coefficient of Lin (95 % CI) and Bland-Altman plots. The degree of agreement was measured using the Kappa index. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (68 % women) were included. The concordance correlation coefficient showed very poor agreement between the two techniques: 0.68 (0.58-0.77), 0.72 (0.62-0.8), and 0.77 (0.69-0.83) for baseline, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The Bland-Altman plots showed that capillary blood glucose measurements result in higher levels than venous blood glucose measurements, with mean differences of 0.39, 0.77, and 1.1 mmol/L at baseline, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The degree of agreement was low, with a Kappa index of 0.59 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The test measured in venous blood is not in agreement with the measurement obtained from capillary blood. It is likely that the diagnostic accuracy attributed without distinction to lactose tolerance test in different studies for lactose malabsorption is incorrect, making it necessary to specify the analysis method.
BACKGROUND: The lactose tolerance test is a classic method for the study of lactose malabsorption. However, the methodology used has not been standardized, and this leads to differences in results. AIM: The aim of this report was to analyze whether capillary blood glucose measurement is in agreement with venous blood glucose when performing lactose tolerance test. METHODS: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with suspected lactose malabsorption who had lactose tolerance test performed in venous and capillary blood simultaneously, using a load of 50 g lactose. Agreement was measured using the concordance correlation coefficient of Lin (95 % CI) and Bland-Altman plots. The degree of agreement was measured using the Kappa index. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (68 % women) were included. The concordance correlation coefficient showed very poor agreement between the two techniques: 0.68 (0.58-0.77), 0.72 (0.62-0.8), and 0.77 (0.69-0.83) for baseline, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The Bland-Altman plots showed that capillary blood glucose measurements result in higher levels than venous blood glucose measurements, with mean differences of 0.39, 0.77, and 1.1 mmol/L at baseline, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The degree of agreement was low, with a Kappa index of 0.59 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The test measured in venous blood is not in agreement with the measurement obtained from capillary blood. It is likely that the diagnostic accuracy attributed without distinction to lactose tolerance test in different studies for lactose malabsorption is incorrect, making it necessary to specify the analysis method.
Authors: E Schirru; V Corona; P Usai-Satta; M Scarpa; F Oppia; F Loriga; F Cucca; S De Virgiliis; R Rossino; M Doloretta Macis; R-D Jores; M Congia Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-02-21 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Carmen Hermida; Pedro Guerra; Oscar H Martínez-Costa; Valentina Sánchez; José J Sánchez; Jesús Solera; Alfonso Fernández-Mayoralas; Rosa Codoceo; Jesús Frías; Juan J Aragón Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.062